MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, January 17th 2019 - 05:34 UTC

Mad Cow Likely to Hurt U.S. Beef Industry.

Saturday, December 27th 2003 - 20:00 UTC
Full article

Though officials haven't yet estimated the financial fallout from the first U.S. case of mad cow disease, the Bush administration told Congress in 2001 that the beef industry could lose $15 billion.

Food safety officials had earlier projected that as many as 300,000 cows could be destroyed if the disease spread like it did in Britain, a prospect diminished by safeguards implemented in response to the British experience with bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or BSE. William D. Hueston, a former Agriculture Department official who directs the Center for Animal Health and Food Safety at the University of Minnesota, said Friday he wouldn't be surprised if up to another two dozen infected cows are found in the United States.

Gregg Doud, chief economist for the Denver-based National Cattlemen's Beef Association, said Friday that U.S. producers stand to lose at least $6 billion from export losses and falling prices. "We've lost roughly 90 percent of our export market just in the last three days," he said. However, Doud said the notion that as many as 300,000 cattle might have to be destroyed is unrealistic since there were far more cases of the disease in Britain and the government hid it from the public a long time. "That's what created the crisis in public confidence," he said. "This situation can't be compared to anything that occurred in the U.K."

Exports represent about $3.8 billion of the $40 billion a year beef industry in the United States, which also is the largest beef-consuming nation.

A U.S. delegation is leaving Saturday for Japan, which takes about one-third of all U.S. beef exports, and possibly other Asian countries that imposed bans on American meat and livestock this week. The Treasury Department said it is monitoring developments.

In March 2001, Bernard Schwetz, then the acting principal deputy commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, briefed the House Appropriations agriculture subcommittee, drawing on what happened in the United Kingdom. "Based on the U.K. experience, if BSE were to be encountered in the U.S., it would not only have an obvious potential impact on our public health, but also a monumental impact on our beef industries, with initial U.S. revenue losses estimated to reach over $15 billion," Schwetz told the subcommittee. That estimate was based on a 1998 British study of economic impacts of the first year of the mad cow outbreak in the United Kingdom, where the disease was first detected in 1986. Schwetz did not immediately return calls for comment Friday.

Britain's first-year economic losses were put at between $1.07 billion and $1.4 billion, according to a report by Congress' General Accounting Office in 2002.

The FDA assumed that "in the event of a BSE crisis, U.S. domestic and export demand would decrease by the same amounts as in Britain ? a 24 percent decline in domestic beef sales and an 80 percent decline in beef and live cattle exports," the GAO said.

The auditors also cited an FDA estimate that livestock producers would lose a minimum of $12 billion "based on an assumption that the United States would need to destroy about four times as many cattle as the United Kingdom."

The British outbreak is blamed for the deaths of 143 people, millions of cattle slaughtered and a devastated domestic beef industry. By the end of the 1990s, economic losses there had reached nearly $7 billion, the congressional auditors said in 2000.

In August 1997, the FDA issued a new regulation aimed at preventing a mad cow epidemic by banning cattle feed made with protein or bone meal from being fed to other grazing animals such as cattle, goats and sheep, which was done to help them gain weight.

An outbreak in the United States like that in Britain might require destroying up to 299,000 infected cattle over seven years, the FDA said in proposing the rule earlier that year.

The new restrictions on cattle feed lowered the projected risks for U.S. cattle, but the FDA still cautioned in proposing the rule in January 1997 that "a significant outbreak would probably lead to the eradication of high-risk animals to restore consumer confidence."

The FDA noted that Switzerland, for example, had proposed slaughtering all cattle born before that country implemented a feed ban, or about one-eighth of its national herd. Some countries continue to ban Swiss cattle 13 years after BSE was first detected there in 1990.

Categories: Mercosur.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!