Saturday, February 20th 2010 - 04:39 UTC

“Malvinas Islands controversy, not a rupture of relations with UK”

A leading spokesperson for the Argentine government in Congress said that there is “no rupture of relations with Great Britain but a controversy over the Malvinas Islands” because of the oil drilling round set to begin in the coming hours in Falklands waters.

Agustin Rossi, Argentine government Lower House spokesperson

Agustin Rossi, head of the government’s block in the Lower House also talked about those companies that could have commercial direct or indirect links with the oil exploration companies involved in the Falklands drilling round or its logistics.

“In fact there are British oil companies working in continental Argentina. But one thing can’t be mixed with the other” said Argentine Rossi, insisting the current situation with Britain is that of “a controversy over the Malvinas”, and “not a rupture of relations”.

“Argentina has a mining investment law and all companies, whatever the origin of the capital they represent, and if they abide by investment regulations are entitled to work in the country. What we are questioning is the presence of an oil rig in the Malvinas Islands because they belong to an international and historic claim of our country. These are two absolutely different things, otherwise it could be interpreted as an arbitrary action from Argentina”, underlined the lawmaker.

He went on to say there’s “no animosity in particular: we have a claim with historic, geographic and geopolitical foundations over the Malvinas islands. This is where all the energy of Argentina must concentrate”.

Further on Rossi pointed out that historically “in each of our international claims is included the request, by Argentina, of a ban on hydrocarbons exploitation or attempted exploitation along the continental platform which corresponds to our country”.

Rossi made the comments following the summoning to Congress of Deputy Foreign Secretary Victorio Taccetti to explain the government’s current policy on the Falklands.
“The purpose of the presidential decree is to adopt all necessary actions so as to avoid an advance in a direction which all international resolutions clearly ban”, said Taccetti who described the decision as “not friendly”.

“Although the measure does not impede traffic in and out of the Malvinas Islands, it does make trips longer, sailing costs increase and it disrupts the logistics effort for the oil drilling operation in Islands’ waters”, pointed out Taccetti.
He added that Argentina “dose not have the means to stop vessels from going to the Malvinas, since we’ve given up the use of force”.

Taccetti mentioned that an additional resolution from the Energy Secretary “eliminates from the registry of authorized companies to operate in hydrocarbons in Argentina, all those involved with a pseudo licence from the Malvinas usurpers”.

He underlined that with decree 256 Argentina was basically protecting its sovereignty claims over the Islands, and complained that the UK has never complied with international resolutions calling on both sides to initiate sovereignty talks.

“The fact is that the decree will force vessels to request cross permits from Argentine authorities and we are also currently talking with friendly countries to avoid those very vessels from taking supplies in their coasts”.
 

6 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.

1 gdr (#) Feb 20th, 2010 - 08:47 am Report abuse
Rossi ,actually means that “England Republic ” !
not UK (illusive Kingdom by Kingless ) !..what a comedy !
2 Justin Kuntz (#) Feb 20th, 2010 - 11:11 am Report abuse
Did someone do the maths and realise they were shooting themselves in the foot?
3 exocet82 (#) Feb 20th, 2010 - 08:41 pm Report abuse
The fact is that the decree will force vessels to request cross permits from Argentine authorities and we are also currently talking with friendly countries to avoid those very vessels from taking supplies in their coasts”.

I love this last quote. All this should have been done long ago by Cristina.
But, its' never too late. Now lets' focus on ending the Lan flights. For every flight to the Malvinas, they give up 20 to Argentina ( and to any Mercosur country hopefully).
4 JustinKuntz (#) Feb 21st, 2010 - 10:57 pm Report abuse
Argentine trade to UK $1.5B
UK trade with Argentina $307M

Yeah right.
5 nitrojuan (#) Feb 21st, 2010 - 11:30 pm Report abuse
Pablo, have you put the Argentine Flag in the Pinguin News? that is not the way, diplomacy will ever win !! Greeting from Ushuaia!
6 belgrano82 (#) Feb 25th, 2010 - 01:24 am Report abuse
The UK is going to ignore Argentinian permits and protestations, Argentina just looks weak and petulant at the moment. She has made her grand proclamations and decrees and still the UK ships sail from her ports and oilrigs drill in the southern ocean unchallenged. The claim of the UK is fully legitimised by the free will of the indigenous British population of the Falklands Islands, who have been there since Britain recovered the Islands from a tiny number of Argentinian pirates (who attacked US shipping and were removed by the USA) in 1833. The Falklands were British before the Argentine existed, the only claim Argentina has is that some Argentinian pirates once lived there for a few years. The UN will make no resolutions against the UK as their claim is fully legal. The UK therefore can and will completely ignore any Argentinian rhetoric. Argentina made a huge mistake in voting an image-conscious moron as president. She is out for herself - no Eva Peron this one, she is corrupt, has bankrupted Argentina, even destroyed and ransacked the Bank of Argentina. She has no interest in the Falklands, she want to stir the population with thoughts of war for popularity and to steal oil money, nothing else. The only way Argentina will ever see any oil money or hold the Falklands will be by total war. In the short term, she will win-back the Falklands as she has far more power in the southern ocean than Britain. Britain will then, aided by its allies Chile, Uruguay (by logistics and lucrative support of the oil trade infrastructure that Argentina could once have had), the USA (albeit by supply of weapons rather than troops, like the last war), return and reclaim the Islands. No British politician, regardless of their party would dare let the islands go with war. Not a single person in Britian would allow British citizens to be subjugated by invading Argentinians, they would rather die. Forget diplomacy, the only way for Argentina to succeed long enough for the moron bitch to be re-elected is war. (P.S. Chavez the Armendinejad of the Americas, please do me a favour! Argentina should be congratulated on her new best friend! LOL!!)

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!

Advertisement

Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!

Advertisement