MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, April 25th 2024 - 07:06 UTC

 

 

Falklands’ on shore Loligo containerisation to improve quality and create jobs

Monday, March 15th 2010 - 18:18 UTC
Full article 28 comments
Transshipment of loligo to refrigerated containers. Transshipment of loligo to refrigerated containers.
Fishing vessels in Stanley bay Fishing vessels in Stanley bay

For the first time a whole season’s catch of Loligo Squid will be containerised in the Falkland Islands, an experiment set to improve the product quality and meet world export demands plus generating on-value added activities in the Islands.

The Falkland Islands floating dock facility FIPASS has been in full swing because to the normal fishing industry activity, comes the Loligo containerization experience and all the operations related to the oil drilling round.

At the east end was the British Antarctic Survey ship Ernest Shackleton discharging rubbish and taking on stores, while at the other was a Seaview Logistics trawler unloading its cargo of loligo squid into the hands of two teams of stevedores.

These teams, one local and the other from the ship’s crew, were toiling ceaselessly to stack the frozen blocks neatly into refrigerated containers, which almost obscured the ship from view. Waiting to take the full containers to nearby hard standing was a fleet of articulated trucks.

Normally, as Seaview manager Alex Reid explained to Penguin News, this trans-shipment would be from trawler to a larger refrigerated ship, or reefer, and would take place in Berkeley Sound.

But this season for the first time, his company together with partners Seafish Falklands, were attempting to containerise all of the loligo catch from their three trawlers.

Given the current heightened activity at FIPASS due to oil exploration and the tourism season, the whole operation was “a strategically nightmare” said Mr Reid, but storage in reefer containers as opposed to the hold of a ship was much better for the product.

So far the containerisation operation is going well, with the second ship currently discharging its cargo in this way. Its success, said Mr. Reid, was down to the magnificent job that South American Atlantic Services (SAAS) had done for his company and to the support received from the management of FIPASS.
So far also, he said the fishing and oil industries seemed to be working hand in glove to the benefit of all.
Containerisation was best for the product, said Mr Reid, but also allowed for much more flexibility of delivery through the worldwide container network.

This point was enthusiastically endorsed to the Penguin News by Director of Natural Resources, John Barton, who said containerisation could bring the opportunity for onshore value-adding activities such as preparing consignments to the requirements of particular clients. Mr Reid said his company was committed to containerisation as the way forward and keen to support SAAS in this regard.

This season’s experiment would, he hoped, prove that it could be done, although further expansion might be limited by the lack of hard standing for containers and particularly the lack of the reefer plugs, essential to keep the cargo frozen until the containers could be loaded for export.
Meanwhile, there is cautious optimism as the illex season also gets underway.

With more than 60 vessels so far having called into Stanley to collect licences to fish for illex squid, early estimates of a likely take-up of around 40 have already been exceeded, said Mr Barton.

Illex catches so far have been variable, reaching 20 to 30 tons per vessel per night, but averaging around 15 tons until just recently when a bit of a dip occurred.

So far it had been a better start to the season than there had been for a few years, but whether it developed into a good season would depend on whether these catch levels could be maintained and improved upon.

Unlike the loligo squid, which lives out its life in relatively inshore waters, the illex is migratory. Mr Barton said so far results from the high seas and areas further to the north of the Falklands had not indicated a massive illex presence, but this could not be ruled out.

By John Fowler – Penguin News - Stanley

 

Categories: Fisheries, Falkland Islands.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Hoytred

    “ ....So far also, he said the fishing and oil industries seemed to be working hand in glove to the benefit of all........ With more than 60 vessels so far having called into Stanley to collect licences to fish for illex squid, early estimates of a likely take-up of around 40 have already been exceeded, said Mr Barton ...... ”

    It's good to know that life on the Falklands continues largely unaffected by their neighbour.

    Mar 16th, 2010 - 02:44 am 0
  • jorge

    Hoytred las malvina no son vecinas de argentina, las Islas Malvinas son parte de la Argentina pertenecen a Argentina.
    Y los recursos que estan explotando son recursos que roban a la Argentina.

    Mar 16th, 2010 - 03:53 am 0
  • Hoytred

    Jorge - Came across this from Mercopress in 2008. Strangely enough it received no comments - ”Argentina did not inherit a unitary claim to the Falkland Islands from Spain as it claims. (Modern Popes and the Vatican Foreign Office attach no validity now to these ancient Papal declarations and say the issue is for modern academics to work out.). The British researchers say these Papal pronouncements were made by “the most corrupt and immoral Pope in history” who was also a Spaniard. The researchers' conclusions say that British and Spanish Treaties of the 17th and 18th century do not prohibit British possession of the Falkland Islands and that a 1825 Anglo-Argentine Treaty of Friendship and Navigation does not support Argentina's sovereignty claim as Argentina incorrectly asserts. The researchers reject Argentine arguments that Britain expelled an Argentine population from the Falklands in 1833: they continued to live there. Argentina dropped its sovereignty claim in 1850. Argentina dropped its claim to the Falkland Islands by ratifying the 1850 Convention of Settlement. Failure to mention this is a “gross distortion of history” by Argentina. Argentina did not mention the Falklands to Britain for the next 34 years nor did any message to the Argentine Congress refer to it for 91 years until 1941. The Argentines also published thousands of copies of a map which indicated that the Falklands were not Argentine territory. The Argentine argument that the Falkland Islanders have no claim to self-determination – a principle enshrined in the United Nations Charter – is “absurd. They have the same right to self-determination as any other immigrant people in the New World. The Argentines have never had a valid claim to South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands. These islands were claimed by Argentina only after the Second World War after decades of acquiescence and acknowledgment of British sovereignty”

    Contary to your opinion, I think you'll find that there are British !

    Mar 16th, 2010 - 04:13 am 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!