Saturday, May 29th 2010 - 01:16 UTC

Plymouth commemorative plaque for Falklands’ conflict Royal Navy vessel

The Commanding Officer of one of the Royal Navy Devonport-based frigates lost in the Falklands conflict has unveiled a commemorative plaque in Plymouth, reports the Herald from Plymouth.

HMS Antelope and HMS Ardent were both victims of Argentine air attack

Captain Nick Tobin, who was the Commanding Officer of HMS Antelope during the campaign, was involved in the ceremony which marked the formal opening of HMS Raleigh's new accommodation blocks.

Four new blocks, named Antelope, Ardent, Sir Galahad and Conqueror, have been built at the Torpoint-based Royal Navy training establishment as part of a major upgrade of facilities. The blocks have been named after units which were part of the UK Task Force sent to recover the Falkland Islands in 1982.

The site's new commemorative plaque is mounted on a stone brought back from the Falkland Islands. As part of the ceremony, Capt Tobin presented the original crest recovered from the bridge of HMS Antelope to officers at HMS Raleigh.

The crest was recovered 48 hours after the ship had been sunk.

Ardent and Antelope blocks are home to the trainees of Corporate Squadron who are undergoing their professional training within the Defense Maritime Logistics School, the Royal Navy Submarine School and the Royal Navy School of Seamanship.

Conqueror block is the new base for the National Sea Cadet Training Centre and Sir Galahad will be used to accommodate sailors returning to HMS Raleigh for career progression courses. Each mess deck has its own utility area, common room and bathroom facilities.

Veterans who served on the ships and the submarine were also invited to attend the ceremony at HMS Raleigh, along with Sea Cadets from the Training Ship (TS) Ardent from Bollington, Cheshire.

Type 21 frigates HMS Antelope and HMS Ardent were both victims of enemy air attack during the Falklands conflict in May 1982. The Royal Fleet Auxiliary Vessel Sir Galahad was classed as a landing ship logistics.

The ship was hit by bombs and badly damaged while unloading soldiers from the Welsh Guard on 8 June 1982. A total of 48 men lost their lives.

HMS Conqueror, a Churchill class submarine, controversially fired the torpedo which sank the Argentine cruiser, General Belgrano, causing the greatest single loss of lives of the 74 day conflict in the South Atlantic.
 

23 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.

1 Hoytred (#) May 29th, 2010 - 02:20 am Report abuse
We will not forget.
2 agent0060 (#) May 29th, 2010 - 03:21 pm Report abuse
Si vis pacem, para bellum (If you desire peace, prepare for war)
3 efyouj.brown (#) May 29th, 2010 - 11:19 pm Report abuse
i wasn't aware that ships were victims. stonking job
4 Hoytred (#) May 30th, 2010 - 12:22 am Report abuse
efyou - that coment just gave away your knowledge/intellect level ..... zero!
5 Ex-Antelope (#) May 31st, 2010 - 02:03 pm Report abuse
Nothing like a building to remind you how old you are :-) The the sprogs talking about the Falklands in the same way we talked about Malaya and Korea?
6 agent0060 (#) May 31st, 2010 - 04:45 pm Report abuse
An important message for David Cameron. Even if you only go back to the 16th century and the Navy Royal, this service has served Britain loyally and incredibly for at least 500 years. 28 years ago we found out we needed them just as much now. Even so, your predecessors insisted of reducing its capability. Give our country and our Navy back our pride. If you don't, it might take as much as 4 months to defeat some hypothetical South American belligerent.
7 jorge! (#) Jun 02nd, 2010 - 03:00 pm Report abuse
.....“HMS Antelope and HMS Ardent were both victims of Argentine air attack”.......

- That happens when you invade someone else territory!!!
8 stick up your junta (#) Jun 02nd, 2010 - 04:07 pm Report abuse
Your army suffers a crushing defeat and gets kicked back to argentina
That happens when you invade someone else territory
9 agent0060 (#) Jun 02nd, 2010 - 08:54 pm Report abuse
@jorge! Won't happen again. Next time the Tomahawks will fly. And you don't have anything to match a Typhoon.

Just as a matter of interest, are gdr, NicoDin and you the only yatterheads left?
10 alexius (#) Jun 02nd, 2010 - 08:59 pm Report abuse
7jorge#... Right! The british navy are stupid. They should have done like Argentinian navy. After “Santa Fe” and “Belgrano” the rest of your navy suddenly was invisible (hidden far away from battle zone!)
which meant almost no more losses. Very clever done or...
And by the way, the british dont know the meaning of “fair game”.
Three times Argentinian press/television/news reported a british carrier (Hermes or Invincible) severely damaged and sunk. Glorious victory!!
however the british crew did not take notice! Though they were finished (3 times!), they continued the game.Fair game??
Jorge if your nation want to colonialise ,better be sure you have a very strong navy/armada.
Just ask the british , the have experience, and you can also ask Portugal and Spain, they too have experience, in particular according to colonisation in the western hemisphere.
Colonisation in the XXI century??? Pathetic....
11 agent0060 (#) Jun 03rd, 2010 - 05:27 pm Report abuse
Tell you what, jorge! I live quite close to Aldershot. You know, the home of the British Army, like the Parachute Regiment. Also not far from Church Crookham, UK base for the Gurkhas. I also have your email address. How about I pop over and tell the lads how you like to disrespect British forces? You remember the Paras, jorge! The guys who kicked your arses. And you must remember the Gurkhas, the guys your little boys ran away rather than face. And do you remember how many times your pitiful lot “sank” our aircraft carriers? Still floating, jorge!
12 Juanweather (#) Jun 03rd, 2010 - 08:14 pm Report abuse
yeah right, those guys you talk about were paid foreigners combatants, it's better when you don't use your own people, isn't it?
You are lame, we defended what's our with our own people after the bad decision of going to war. Obious defeat with several guests like USA & CHILE among others...NICE! a world power allied with other powers to fight against a great nation like Argentina allied with small countries. In the end, ARGENTINE COURAGE prevailed.
13 agent0060 (#) Jun 03rd, 2010 - 08:27 pm Report abuse
You are just a brain-dead zombie. Don't post here again. If this is the standard of your contribution, you should be committed to an asylum. But I have a better idea. Stick yourself in the front line of your next invasion. Get your brains stirred with a bayonet. Lose the top of your skull, or your head, to a kukri. Argentine courage? Nearly 12,000 POWs too scared to fight. Every one a coward. Argentines talk big, but that's all. NO GUTS. Except the stuff we left on the landscape. Bird food.
14 Juanweather (#) Jun 03rd, 2010 - 09:00 pm Report abuse
13 agent0060.

great commet of a 12-year old boy/girl. Congrats you do demonstrate the falkland's thought. Then, they say they hate Hitler! Irony everywhere!
15 alexius (#) Jun 03rd, 2010 - 09:28 pm Report abuse
12# juanweather...
“Argentinian courage” . Somehow i like you, because i like people with sense of humour.
Your air force did their very best, and the paid dearly, and deserve respect. The other parts of your army forces better hope their “efforts”
very soon will be forgotten.
They had one advantage. They were able to run faster than the British
forces... Unfortunately most of them ran backwards (away from battle zone)!!
Remember juanweather! It is well documented (pictures/movies/eyewitnesses) on the www what happened in Falkland Islands.
What comes next?? Conquest of the desert was a “Glorious Victory”?
16 Juanweather (#) Jun 03rd, 2010 - 09:45 pm Report abuse
yes, they did their best. But some, specially the kids, weren't prepared to fight and ran for food or survival...(remember never had resources to survive, and much less to fight). Still admirable, it hurts to know that this should never have passed
17 jorge! (#) Jun 04th, 2010 - 09:10 am Report abuse
11 agent0060 said.......“. I also have your email address.”......

- So?????? You could have sent me a greeting letter for my birthday, idiot!!!!
18 agent0060 (#) Jun 04th, 2010 - 01:55 pm Report abuse
@14 Juanweather. Were you alive at the time?
19 Idlehands (#) Jun 04th, 2010 - 02:17 pm Report abuse
The story of why the Argentine conscripts in the hills west of Stanley were starving is a disgrace that Argentina should be ashamed of.

There was no shortage of provisions - the military leadership was entirely to blame and it was not just incompetence that caused it. It is utterly baffling why it happened.
20 diego (#) Jun 04th, 2010 - 03:14 pm
Comment removed by the editor.
21 agent0060 (#) Jun 04th, 2010 - 03:36 pm
Comment removed by the editor.
22 thorson (#) Jun 05th, 2010 - 12:07 am
Comment removed by the editor.
23 jorge! (#) Jun 05th, 2010 - 08:54 pm Report abuse
Oh dear, jajaja, where is the editor?

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!

Advertisement

Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!