Saturday, August 28th 2010 - 06:58 UTC

Mrs. Kirchner sends bill declaring production of newsprint of “public interest”

Argentine President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner sent the project that aims to declare of “public interest” the production and distribution of newsprint to the Lower House of Congress, where it is believed the opposition's A Group would vote against the bill; however, centre-left parties might join the pro-government initiative.

The controversial issue is seeing as an attempt by the Kirchner couple to control the written press

Several opposition blocs have already expressed different opinions regarding the project, even though the UCR, the Federal JP, the Civic Coalition, and the PRO parties already announced they would vote against the bill.

According to the government, the proposal aims at regulating the price and the distribution of newsprint, in order to address a historic claim from provincial newspapers, which feel they have been victims of trade patterns imposed by Papel Prensa company.

Socialists and centre-left parties could back the move, provided the spirit of declaring newsprint of “public interest” be upheld. This group of legislators will be the key to determine the bill's future, which, if approved, would be passed on to the Upper House, where the numbers are more balanced.

The bill proposes declaring of “public interest the manufacturing, marketing, and distribution of cellulose pulp and of newsprint.” The document also says that “it is important to highlight that newsprint production constitutes an activity that is absolutely relevant due to its direct contribution to the existence of publications, on which great part of cultural and news transmission depend in modern societies.”

The project arrived at the Lower House at 8:45 pm Friday. Previously, Radical Senators Ernesto Sanz and Gerardo Morales, in a rally in Córdoba province, warned the government's decision seeks to “alter the opposition's agenda.”

They also assured the initiative against Papel Prensa “is not a priority for the UCR,” and they announced they would not support a bill “under any circumstances that seeks to limit freedom of expression.”

“They think they can get far with their cooptation strategy, but it's not our priority. We can debate it this year or the next,” they added.

Civic Coalition spokespersons said the government is seeking to “destroy critical media” with this measure that involves Papel Prensa, a company led by Clarín Group, but that is also shared by La Nación newspaper and the government.

Even though within the Federal Peronism party members where stating they would analyze the initiative before making any decision, they finally announced they would reject it, since they considered “the Executive branch is sending a bill that is based on a history that lacks credibility.”

“Everyday, new versions appear to contradict the one the government used as a basis for this bill,” Dissident JP sources informed. (BAH)
 

23 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.

1 harrier61 (#) Aug 28th, 2010 - 10:00 am Report abuse
Going well, then!!
2 Beef (#) Aug 28th, 2010 - 10:12 am Report abuse
CFK is not looking at her best in that picture. For what is usually a fairly glam lady she is looking tired and a bit jaundiced.

Before anyone comments - I am not being offensive just commenting on the picture as it is clear that she has lots on her mind at the moment.
3 Frank (#) Aug 28th, 2010 - 10:35 am Report abuse
That's her 'I think its all going tits up' look.... I think we will be seeing more of that.....
4 Rhaurie-Craughwell (#) Aug 28th, 2010 - 11:35 am Report abuse
Wow Argentine politics enter a new exciting phase! Debating on the merits of paper.

One word of note “Public interest” is a somewhat rather ambiguous term and is open to all kinds of interpretation, which the government shouldn't be the controller of, it echo's the draconian but misguided anti-terror laws in the UK which were marketed as in the “public interest”?
5 jerry (#) Aug 28th, 2010 - 04:31 pm Report abuse
“Public interest” in this case actually means controlled by the government.
6 harrier61 (#) Aug 28th, 2010 - 04:52 pm Report abuse
What odds the Opposition kills this? Just as a taster for the 2011 elections.
7 Wireless (#) Aug 28th, 2010 - 05:33 pm Report abuse
Never mind her 'I think its all going tits up', I'd been more interested if she was showing them in public.
8 harrier61 (#) Aug 28th, 2010 - 06:52 pm Report abuse
She's 57 for God's sake. Either they are flaps or they are implants.
9 Wireless (#) Aug 28th, 2010 - 07:44 pm Report abuse
It would still be a more interesting story if she bared all, who gives a crap about Argentinians banning free speech to Argentinians? Next they will be 'disappearing' each other, doh! I forgot, they've already been down that route, but as I've said, history seems to have this annoying habit of repeating itself.

I don't actually see a down side for the UK, the next time they invade they won't even get to the beach, there won't be any new grave yard built as they will all be at the bottom of the sea.

I still think we should dig up the dead Argies at Darwin and dump them in the Mid-Atlantic Trench, then blow the gravesite up and send Kirchner them the footage with a note 'enough is enough, now go forth and multiply', or words to that effect.

Christina will be happy, the video will keep her and hubby in corrupt power for a bit longer, so they can steal something else.
10 katraskin II (#) Aug 29th, 2010 - 12:16 am Report abuse
I agree with number 4
Beware of the K’s! This so called “public interest” it’s another step towards the control of the press. Afterwards is coming expropriation with the stupid complicity of the left parties. It’s true that the fact that one or two papers controlling the supply of newsprint is something basically wrong. But the K’s who were trying to subjugate the independent press from the beginning, now pretend to place newsprint manufacture and distribution under state control which is absolutely worst. Hence the set-up of such a farce like the one which took place last Tuesday.
11 avargas2001 (#) Aug 29th, 2010 - 08:47 am Report abuse
Finally we are getting laws to protect Argentina from bias media reports, signs of the bias reporting showed up a few weeks , when timerman pointed out this same two newspapers for the lack of national media support.
www.buenosairesherald.com/BreakingNews/View/37381
12 harrier61 (#) Aug 29th, 2010 - 09:19 am Report abuse
An excellent article in the Herald, although it is unclear who was being reported on, Gauleiter Taiana or Gauleiter Timerman. I thought the piece that read “He also blasted local Argentine newspapers Clarín and La Nación, which he assures asked for a press conference ”so he could talk about domestic policy.“

”I thought it was disrespectful, considering everything that happened at the UN. As years go by, more and more countries support Argentina's claim over the Malvinas,“ he expressed.”

I've noticed that British politicians also run around complaining that certain British newspapers only want to report on things of interest to their readership...not!

I also noticed the supportive nature of the readers' comments. Six comments given over to advertising and this one:
“1| Driain - 25/06/2010
Yes, the butchers of human rights in Tibet are entirely appropriate allies for the would-be butchers of democracy on the Falklands Islands.”

“laws to protect Argentina from bias media reports”? No, gassy, laws to protect the Argentine government from media reports that don't fit in with government policies and actions.
13 avargas2001 (#) Aug 29th, 2010 - 08:03 pm Report abuse
I am an Argentina and I don't see our government doing anything to quiet the media but an action to wider our information sources, if people support monopolies like la nacion and el clarin I believe they should take them to their nation and let them work there, not in Argentina. if someone throws away something good you don't let them know you take it home and enjoy it yourself, to all those who think this 2 news outlet are good stop pesting Argentina over it, put a bid for their stocks buy 51% to gain control and enjoy it, why pest us with something we don't want ??? take it already.
14 fredbdc (#) Aug 31st, 2010 - 12:15 pm Report abuse
Hasn't Hugo nationalized a bunch of farms for the “national interest” I wonder when that will start happening?
15 Sergio Vega (#) Aug 31st, 2010 - 03:26 pm Report abuse
The next step will be to nationalize the magazines shops in Argentina as “national interest” item, so the opposition couldn´t sell their layer media to people.....

R.I.P. Argentina
16 harrier61 (#) Aug 31st, 2010 - 03:30 pm Report abuse
It is in the public interest for Argentines to have access to Government-controlled “free” newspapers. Where else are they going to get the squares of paper to put in the lavvies?
17 avargas2001 (#) Aug 31st, 2010 - 05:41 pm Report abuse
Did you guys buy 51% the stocks already so you can take this 2 newspapers to your country, we the Argentine's don't want this 2 newspapers in Argetina, stop pesting us and take them to your country, these papers keep Argentine's ignorant over real facts causing the world to attack individual Argentine for the lies planted in our heads, this newspapers trash Argentine politicians without ever bringing up solutions to problems, and on top of it all they where involved with the military junta, they got to go soon.
18 jerry (#) Aug 31st, 2010 - 09:36 pm Report abuse
17 - With such intelligent comments as these, it is no wonder that non-Argies think that Argentinians are so dumb and stupid. (They all are not!)
19 avargas2001 (#) Sep 01st, 2010 - 03:28 am Report abuse
anything in the name of national security, or are we latin Americans not allowed to have national security ?? I think USA has it as well, o no wait maybe that was in another planet.
20 Typhoon (#) Sep 02nd, 2010 - 12:22 pm Report abuse
National Security? What has Argentina got that anybody else would want?
21 Fernando_A (#) Sep 03rd, 2010 - 09:07 am Report abuse
UK, small country, small minds.. and lots of insecurity, that's what your comments reflect
22 Typhoon (#) Sep 03rd, 2010 - 12:13 pm Report abuse
@21 F_A.
Try reading this:
en.mercopress.com/2010/05/29/argentines-the-most-anxious-of-latinamerica-and-at-world-level

Argentina - no minds, just mouths!!
23 Fernando_A (#) Sep 03rd, 2010 - 09:09 pm Report abuse
“according to an international opinion” I see, just out of curiosity.. where is the editor from?

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!

Advertisement

Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!