Ban Ki-moon Says World Leaders Need to “Lead By Action”
United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon today called for “revolutionary action” to achieve sustainable development, warning that the past century’s heedless consumption of resources is “a global suicide pact” with time running out to ensure an economic model for survival.
“Let me highlight the one resource that is scarcest of all: Time,” he told the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, in a session devoted to redefining sustainable development. “We are running out of time. Time to tackle climate change. Time to ensure sustainable, climate-resilient green growth. Time to generate a clean energy revolution.”
Calling sustainable development the growth agenda for the 21st century, Ban recited a litany of development errors based on a false belief in the infinite abundance of natural resources that fuelled the economy in the last century.
“We mined our way to growth,” he said. “We burned our way to prosperity. We believed in consumption without consequences. Those days are gone. In the 21st century, supplies are running short and the global thermostat is running high.
“Climate change is also showing us that the old model is more than obsolete. It has rendered it extremely dangerous. Over time, that model is a recipe for national disaster. It is a global suicide pact.”
All this now needs rethinking to secure the balanced development that will lift people out of poverty while protecting the planet and ecosystems that support economic growth, he told the assembly of heads of State and government, international economists, business and industry leaders and civil society.
“Here at Davos – this meeting of the mighty and the powerful, represented by some key countries – it may sound strange to speak of revolution,” he said. “But that is what we need at this time. We need a revolution. Revolutionary thinking. Revolutionary action. A free market revolution for global sustainability.
“It is easy to mouth the words ‘sustainable development,’ but to make it happen we have to be prepared to make major changes – in our lifestyles, our economic models, our social organization, and our political life. We have to connect the dots between climate change and what I might call here, WEF – water, energy and food.” WEF is also the acronym for the Davos World Economic Forum.
“We need you to step up. Spark innovation. Lead by action. Invest in energy efficiency and renewable energy for those who need them most – your future customers. Expand clean energy access in developing countries – your markets of tomorrow.”
He called on business leaders present to join the 11-year-old United Nations Global Impact, the world’s largest corporate responsibility initiative committing businesses to aligning their operations and strategies with 10 universally accepted principles in the areas of human rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption.
And he called on governments both in Davos and around the world to send the right signals to build the green economy. “Together, let us tear down the walls,” he declared. “The walls between the development agenda and the climate agenda. Between business, government and civil society. Between global security and global sustainability. It is good business – good politics – and good for society.
“In an odd way, what we are really talking about is going back to the future. The ancients saw no division between themselves and the natural world. They understood how to live in harmony with the world around them. It is time to recover that sense of living harmoniously for our economies and our societies.
“Not to go back to some imagined past, but to leap confidently into the future with cutting-edge technologies, the best science and entrepreneurship has to offer, to build a safer, cleaner, greener and more prosperous world for all. There is no time to waste.”
At a separate event, Ban launched a new Global Compact initiative called Global Compact Lead with a group of 54 global companies as founding members, who have committed to be at the cutting edge of environmental, social and governance issues, joining forces to translate sustainable development principles into business operations and deepening partnerships with the entire UN system.
“When companies like yours drive sustainability issues deeper into your operations and strategy, year after year, you send a powerful signal. Indeed, you change the world,” he told the business leaders. “In this century far more than the last, we need business to achieve our fundamental purposes at the United Nations.
“This is why LEAD and the Blueprint for Corporate Sustainability are so important. By working together at the strategic level as well as in concrete partnerships, we can leverage our respective strengths to address some of the toughest problems of our time.”
Speaking at a news conference, Ban noted that he had dedicated much of his time in Davos to building momentum on efforts to deal with climate change, stressing that agreement among all nations is both necessary and possible. “It may not be easy, but things worth doing seldom are,” he said.
UN-sponsored conferences in Copenhagen, Denmark, and Cancún, Mexico, over the past 13 months have narrowed some differences including pledges to help developing countries mitigate the effects of climate change and action to tackle deforestation, which accounts for nearly one-fifth of global warming carbon emissions.
But the major components of an accord to cap the increase in the world’s average temperature at two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels still remain to be worked out.
Suggested Stories
-
Jun 20th 2013
Swiss lawmakers defy Washington reject deal to lift banking secrecy and expose US tax dodgers
-
Jun 19th 2013
Gibraltar invites Spanish treasury inspectors to dispel claims of tax evasion money
-
Jun 19th 2013
India-Argentina pledge to improve trade; Timerman thanks Delhi support on Malvinas dispute
-
Jun 18th 2013
US and EU agree to launch ambitious free-trade negotiations in Washington in July
17 comments Feed
Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.
blah blah blah and are we supposed to believe in you Mr. Ban, when $#@*% like this are involved?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=3UpIFgmX6aY
The UN idea of sustainable development is to set up a UN infrastructure in a developing country and call it “capacity building”. Millions are spent on buildings and staff and the poverty continues. Look at the situation of the Haiti earthquake victims and the Pakistan floods. Money flows out of wealthy countries and travels through many filtering processes before it arrives, severely depleted, in the target country, to be depleted even more by “feasibility studies” and UN bureaucracy.
in USA are -- 75 billion $.--
6 billion...equities, rest are for debts !
....need to embrace economic innovation in order to save the planet.
“We need a revolution,” on how best to make the global economy sustainable.
“Climate change is also showing us that the old model is more than obsolete.”
the current economic model (is) a recipe for “national disaster”
“We are running out of time. Time to tackle climate change, time to ensure sustainable … growth.”
..........................
I agree, I agreeeeeeeeeee.
And let's start with the Greatest Power On Earth being persuaded to rein in on 'Spectacular Consumption'.
Initiate a world-wide campaign: “Help make every American a thin American”. The President of thwe USA is a good role-model - South American states could tell him on his visit south that Consumption Reduction is a core part of the Americas' Quid Pro Quo agenda.
'you' exported all your production AND its pollution to China and India. 'You' did this knowingly.
What you can do now is in your backyard (wherever it is). Do your bit, whether it is down-sizing your car, reducing your fuel consumption, anything within your capability.
In the meantime, the best and biggest developments of carbon-reduced activities are evolving in China; time is of the essence and China IS attending to matters alongside its transition to developed world status - which is more than we can say about the US of A, who has NO EXCUSE.
You have obviously never been to any of these countries and only know what you read on the fantasy liberal eco-terrorist web sites. All I can say is the majority of the US doesn't believe in that wacko myth and you won't get any buy in from us. If we were gong to do something we would hvae done it by now.
I have spent my life as an applied environmental scientist and my university business frequently enabled me to visit (and work in) the States and the Far East, including China.
It's a pity you, personally, refuse to take responsibility for being one of the world's great consumers and polluters.
('terrorism' - a much more focussed expression since the advent of mass-murder human-bomb killings by 'real' terrorists).
Whilst much more interested in eco-trading than eco-terrorism my true calling is in the application of science, not economics, to world processes.
PS. “If we were gong to do something we would hvae done it by now.” (#8)Check out Cancun 2010 and the REDD+ Agreement.
Luckily we are constantly doing things, right as well as wrong, and we WILL drag the USA into the big picture - saving you from having to answer “what did you and uncle Sam do to the world, daddy”.
“I ate till I could eat no more, I drunk till I was overfull, I bought masses of things really cheaply - and wasted and threw away most of it.
I used up all the things the world could provide me with knowing that I was causing the death of other fellow men, but hell son, they were all foreigners and Muslim terrorists!
Look at what I did to the world, my son - I, I did that! ...
Not just me, you understand - ALL Americans. We consumed like there was no tomorrow...”
Yes dad, but what happens to me tomorrow?”
Quite the reverse - conspicuously successful over the years.
Do you have a job?
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!