MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, April 18th 2024 - 05:23 UTC

 

 

Latin America: Making the Good Times Better

Saturday, February 26th 2011 - 03:02 UTC
Full article 5 comments
IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn

By Dominique Strauss-Kahn - Latin America has enjoyed tremendous economic dynamism and a rising quality of life in recent years. But, faced with new challenges, the question is: how best to sustain this progress?

As I travel through the region next week—visiting Panama, Uruguay, and Brazil—I’m looking forward to hearing the views of government officials, parliamentarians, and university students on the key challenges facing their countries today. Here are three questions that I look forward to discussing during my trip.

First, as the region enjoys a time of abundance—una época de vacas gordas—can there be too much of a good thing?

Latin America’s economies are growing rapidly, buoyed by good access to external financing and high commodity prices. But potentially worrying signs of overheating are popping up—rising inflation, rapidly growing credit, and booming stock markets.

We all know how this story can end if policymakers don’t act early enough to prevent boom from turning into bust. Guiding their economies to a soft landing may be the most important near-term challenge facing policymakers in Latin America today.

Withdrawing the macroeconomic stimulus adopted during the global crisis should be the first step—and some countries are already doing so. Countries should probably begin with fiscal policy, to reduce the burden on monetary policy. In some cases, however, rising inflationary pressure calls for action now on both the fiscal and the monetary fronts. Exchange rate flexibility is also important. In the current setting, appreciation can help temper capital inflows, by making foreign investors think twice about future exchange rate risk. To protect financial stability, prudential measures may need to be tightened. Finally, while capital controls may be useful temporarily in some cases, they should not be considered a substitute for macro or prudential measures.

Second, are countries equipped to handle future times of lean—la época de vacas flacas?

With the global financial crisis only just receding in the rear-view mirror, it may seem premature to think about possible future shocks. But the global economy remains exposed to downside risks, and it is always good to be prepared for a possible change in the economic weather. Latin America’s experience during the crisis—bouncing back from it much better than most other regions—shows the benefit of building policy buffers and reducing vulnerabilities in times of plenty. Over the last decade, countries across the region have strengthened their policy frameworks, lowered public debt, increased foreign reserve buffers, allowed greater exchange rate flexibility, and improved financial supervision and regulation. These all played a role in the region’s success.

What about the road ahead? Let me mention two areas where countries in Latin America—and indeed around the world—would do well to focus their efforts.

First, fiscal space. One of the most important lessons of the global financial crisis is that economies with healthier public finances had more room to offset the impact of the crisis, and to protect the most vulnerable. Going forward, countries should rebuild fiscal space—and in fact go even farther, where needed, to bring debts down to safe levels. Panama is one of the Latin American countries already working in this direction.

Second, financial stability. We also learned from the crisis how quickly seemingly isolated financial problems can engulf the entire financial system, affect the broader economy, and spread across national boundaries. We need better tools to monitor risks both within and across institutions. Regulators and supervisors should be empowered to take early preventive action. Indeed, a number of countries in Latin America—including Brazil—are already strengthening macro-prudential financial regulations.

Finally, how best to share these times of plenty—across society, and with future generations? Como compartir—y prolongar—la época de las vacas gordas?

The region has undergone a dramatic transformation over the past decade, lifting tens of millions of people out of poverty. In Uruguay, for example, the poverty rate has fallen by a remarkable 10 percentage points since 2004. Today, the challenge for the region is to embark on the next stage of its transformation—reforms are needed to sustain strong growth for generations to come, and allow the fruits of growth to be shared across all members of society.

Reforms that boost productivity—such as revitalizing infrastructure and improving education and training—are clearly essential. Improving the business climate and strengthening governance are also important for a pro-growth strategy.

But growth for growth’s sake is not enough. The region remains profoundly unequal, with about a third of its people living in poverty. Leaders across the region are rightly committed to tackling this problem. And making the social safety net more effective is an important part of the strategy. Here, innovative conditional cash transfer programs—for example, Brazil’s bolsa familia program—are playing an important role, and are in fact being emulated around the world. Raising social spending and improving the quality of service delivery—in education, health, and public infrastructure—are also key priorities.

Latin America has come a long way over the last decade. But the region’s transformation is not yet complete. Leaders across the region should capitalize on today’s favourable conditions, transforming their countries to the next level, and ensuring that the benefits of growth are more widely shared.

 

Categories: Economy, Politics, Latin America.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • xbarilox

    “how best to sustain this progress?” Don't worry Muppet, watch and learn.

    “una época de vacas gordas” This is Spanish, Mercopress, what's happening to you? You are being forced to speak and write Spanish a la manera de los latinoamericanos hahaha
    Les dejo una cumbia villera pa' que sigan aprendiendo español haha para todos los guachines yerba brava, vamo lo pibeeeee haha
    aguante el apache!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqXiVDhZHpQ&feature=fvst

    Feb 26th, 2011 - 06:53 am 0
  • Forgetit87

    Of the chief of the largest international bank in the world, I'd have expected more than those platitudes. He leaves unmentioned the most importance issues for the region: that inflationary pressures might be caused by capital markets liquidity, not by high aggregate demand; that some Latin American countries are having soaring current account deficits - something that may in the future develop into currency crises. This issue is of great importance: Latin America's well-known boom and bust cycle has been the result of large, and ultimately unsustainable, current account deficits being carried for too long. He doesn't warn us about that, though. In fact, he actually recommends that we inflate our currencies to fight inflation. That is harmful in the short term - it affects job creation - and suicidal in the mid-term. As for foreign investors, they're obviously not going to bother with “future exchange rate risk”. Just like animals, market investors don't have the ability to plan for the long term. If profits from high interest rates and strong currency are good, they'll keep coming en masse: just see the 1990s Asian crisis. If prospects for the short term are very good, people will not be pressured to worry about some vague possibility that the outcomes of policies being now implented - policies that result in high profits for them - might end in tears.

    He also avoids by all means mentioning inflation in commodity prices - something that resulted from US currency devaluation policy. In fact, he has actually called in recent days for a weaker dollar (and also a strong renmibi). One can only wonder, who is this guy: is he the chief of the bank responsible for watching over GLOBAL economic stability, or is he the international face of the US Trade and Commerce Chamber? Perhaps in the near future he'll ask us to buy U.S. - but not Chinese -products to force inflation in domestically produced consumer goods down.

    Feb 26th, 2011 - 10:19 am 0
  • GeoffWard

    If only the IMF and Dominique Strauss-Kahn were properly appraised about the inbuilt weaknesses of the Bolsa Familia as well as its supposed successes.

    The IMF briefing seems to be closely allied to the UN progress reports that took a decidedly left-wing socialist perspective on the project and its 'successes'.

    Dilma has asked the fundimental question - how do we get families off the BF and willing to stand on their own feet?
    Because if it simply remains as an ever-expanding hand-out, transferring monies from the middle class to the working and non-working classes it will remain a Robin Hood tax perpetuating a new dependency culture.

    Also there is much, much less effective scrutiny of the key part of the BF - ensuring that it is linked to *achievement* in state education by the children of the 'poor'. Brasil remains close to the bottom of all world rankings of educational achievement. - a situation exacerbated by Lula's frequent declarations that even Brasilian presidents can be uneducated and reach the top of the tree.

    One can only agree with these IMF three key statements/questions.

    The key question is - is Brasil prepared to use its governance and administration to ensure these monitary and fiscal programmes are in place, ready and functioning for when inevitable down-turns arrive?

    Feb 26th, 2011 - 11:10 am 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!