MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, September 20th 2018 - 14:47 UTC

Obama justifies his first war, but will not go down the Iraq road

Tuesday, March 29th 2011 - 04:53 UTC
Full article 12 comments
The US president is being particularly attentive, sharing responsibilities and costs with Nato allies The US president is being particularly attentive, sharing responsibilities and costs with Nato allies

US President Barack Obama has defended the first war launched under his presidency, insisting US military involvement in Libya will be limited. He told Americans US intervention as part of the coalition had saved “countless lives” threatened by the forces of the “tyrant” Muammar Gaddafi.

But having led the initial campaign, the US would hand over to Nato allies on Wednesday, he said. Meanwhile, the rebel advance inside Libya has been slowed down near Sirte.

While Nato insists it is impartial in the conflict, Russia has renewed its expressions of concern, saying intervention in an internal civil war is not sanctioned by UN Security Council Resolution 1973.

Some 40 delegations - from the coalition, the UN, Nato, the African Union and Arab League - are preparing to meet in London on Tuesday to discuss the way forward for Libya.

“Tonight, I can report that we have stopped Gaddafi's deadly advance,” Mr Obama said, speaking from the National Defence University in Washington DC.

But the lead in enforcing the no-fly zone “and protecting civilians on the ground” would now move to US “allies and partners”.

“Because of this transition to a broader, Nato-based coalition, the risk and cost of this operation - to our military, and to American taxpayers - will be reduced significantly,” Mr Obama said. “We must always measure our interests against the need for action,” the president continued.

“But that cannot be an argument for never acting on behalf of what's right...

”We were faced with the prospect of violence on a horrific scale. We had a unique ability to stop that violence: an international mandate for action, a broad coalition prepared to join us, the support of Arab countries and a plea for help from the Libyan people themselves.“

He said that to broaden the aims of the military mission in Libya to overthrowing Col Gadaffi would be a mistake. The US, he said, had gone down that road in Iraq and could not afford the cost in lives, time and money again

Earlier on Monday, Mr Obama spoke by video conference with French President Nicolas Sarkozy, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and UK Prime Minister David Cameron as part of his regular consultations with European allies.

The leaders agreed that Col Gaddafi ”had lost any legitimacy to rule and should leave power, and that the Libyan people should have the political space to determine their own future”, a White House statement said.
 

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • GeoffWard

    Come on, Mercopress,
    you know that this is not a War.
    And it remains unsanctioned by the Senate so the USA is not officially at war.

    The UN (world ) Resolution has been put into initial effect by half a dozen countries on behalf of those countries with little capability to support the UN - and on behalf of those countries that 'sit on the wall' and those that hide behind it, and those that are bound by the Resolution and then snipe against it using a variety of association pressure groups.

    It is now to be managed by NATO - a much more satisfactory 'beast' for all the snipers to criticise and undermine.

    But I understand from a Chinese press agency, that the African Union has a four point Agreement with Gadaffi for termination of this affair.
    Does this operate in parallel with the Nato action? Does it supplant it? Is it the Exit Strategy that 'the West' are so keen to find?

    As the man-in-the-street says “We have a right to know” - or do we have to wait for a Wikileak?

    Mar 29th, 2011 - 11:09 am 0
  • briton

    As you say we are not at war, merely enforcing a no fly zone, no countries wants to jump to far forward , as to be left out in front,
    It is complicated they say, I think that no one wants to be around in case it goes tits up, but on the other hand, if it becomes a success then 40 countries will claim they did it.
    Interesting to say the least ..

    Mar 29th, 2011 - 12:33 pm 0
  • Marcos Alejandro

    #1, “you know that this is not a War”
    Is a football match?

    Mar 29th, 2011 - 03:19 pm 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!