MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, September 24th 2018 - 06:12 UTC

Three RAF Typhoons cannibalized to keep warplanes over Libya

Friday, June 17th 2011 - 06:09 UTC
Full article 74 comments
Four of the £ 125 million Typhoons are stationed in the Falklands Four of the £ 125 million Typhoons are stationed in the Falklands

Three Royal Air Force Typhoons, costing £125million each, and similar to those stationed in the Falkland Islands are being cannibalized at RAF Coningsby in Lincolnshire to cover a desperate shortage of parts and keep warplanes flying over Libya reported the Daily Mail on Thursday.

Eight Typhoons are taking part in bombing raids and enforcing the no-fly zone over Libya. The jets also patrol the Falkland Islands and provide the Quick Reaction Alert force protecting UK airspace.

But to save money, air chiefs did not order enough spare parts for the warplanes when they came into service two years ago. This means three jets had to be grounded in March so RAF technicians could raid them to keep the maximum number of Typhoons in the air.

Conservative MP Chris Heaton-Harris, who asked a series of parliamentary questions about the jets, said: ‘It is a disgraceful waste of taxpayers’ money to have £375million sitting in the RAF equivalent of a salvage yard providing spares to keep other planes in the air. Spares should have been easily sourced and in the original contract.

‘The RAF needs to shake itself out of this Steptoe and Son mentality and sort out its logistics problems once and for all – and ministers should be leading this process.’

Shadow Defense Secretary Jim Murphy said: ‘It is vital that the MoD gets a grip on procurement.

‘When our brave forces are in action overseas people will be dismayed that millions of taxpayers’ pounds are being wasted on aircraft that aren’t in action.’

Retired Air Commodore Andrew Lambert said the practice of raiding aircraft for spare parts was ‘neither new nor unusual’.

These planes, dubbed ‘Christmas trees’ by mechanics, were usually undergoing a six-month overhaul so it made sense to strip them of parts if another jet urgently needed one.

‘If you are saying is it better to have spares so you don’t have to cannibalize a plane, then probably yes,’ he said. ‘But there is not an awful lot of money in the defense budget to do this. If you have to rob Peter to refit Paul, then you get on and do it.’

RAF sources said equipment was often taken off a plane as soon as it came into service and fitted to another jet in the operating fleet. Defense equipment minister Peter Luff said: ‘This is a routine measure. None of these aircraft was in the forward fleet.’
 

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Redhoyt

    But the one's on the Falkland islands are not being cannabalised .... so this is a little irrelevant!

    Jun 17th, 2011 - 08:30 am 0
  • Idlehands

    Why has Mercopress included a photograph of what is clearly a Tornado to accompany this article?

    Jun 17th, 2011 - 08:49 am 0
  • geo

    making warplanes are not as the same as the passenger planes .

    unique warplanes making is very simple job can be produced by
    any ordinary countries but they are just like the wheels of vehicle
    the rest parts are whole logistic - technological- strategical- value added

    it is very very hard / not possible to make all together these systems by any countries except USA , China , Russia . !

    Jun 17th, 2011 - 09:57 am 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!