<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <title><![CDATA[Uruguay’s position on barring Malvinas flagged vessels “has not changed an iota”]]></title>
  <link>http://en.mercopress.com/</link>
  <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://en.mercopress.com/2013/04/22/antarctica-tour-operators-hold-four-day-annual-meeting-in-punta-arenas?rss" />
  <description><![CDATA[In an official communiqué Uruguay ratified full support for Argentina’s Malvinas sovereignty claim and underlined that the barring of Malvinas’ flagged vessel from Uruguayan ports stands and “has not changed an iota”.]]></description>
  <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2013, MercoPress.</copyright>
    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Jefferson's soul]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83423</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83423</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The Facklanders treat us as muppets but it must be very sad for them not to be recognized by anybody. There must change their flags, so that shows their attitude must change with the rest of the countries, they think they can control us and we don't want to be part of the long conflict (or love story)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:37:49 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Alejomartinez]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83440</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83440</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[UK may say whatever they want or wish, relaity will always prevail. The same as Argentinas's sovereignty over the islands!]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:09:13 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[RedBaron]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83443</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83443</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The reality is that the Falklands are a British Overseas Territory as long as the islanders wish that to be true.
The other reality is that Argentina has no sovereignty over the Falklands!!

Both these realities will prevail until Hell freezes over.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:31:58 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[so_far]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83446</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83446</guid>
      <description><![CDATA["Uruguay considers the Malvinas Islands as an English colonial possession in Latin America.."

1) got it ?

"..consequently can’t recognize their (illegal) flag.."

2) got it ?

"This anti-colonialist stance it not a solitary position from Uruguay, but of the whole of Latin America”

3) got it ?

“Under no circumstances can we accept vessels with the Malvinas flag in our ports” 

4) got it ?

"...creating the necessary conditions for a peaceful negotiation, the sole path to solve this historic difference and “longstanding painful controversy”

5) got it ?

"Uruguay......it does not authorize the docking of English naval units with destination Malvinas"

6) got it ?

"“There is a political definition not to allow the access to Uruguayan ports of vessels flying the Malvinas Islands flag and whose sovereignty is claimed by Argentina with the support of Uruguay"

7) got it ?

"Uruguay’s position on barring Malvinas flagged vessels “has not changed an iota”

8) got it ?

“Under no circumstances can we accept vessels with the Malvinas flag in our ports” 

9) got it ?

How many FACTS you need for understand that NOBODY in LATAM will EVER recognise your supposed "rights" ? you´re only british invaders and you have rights of course in your loved UK...thats a FACT.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:44:13 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[M_of_FI]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83447</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83447</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[@1.  So when you say everybody, you just mean Uruguay, Brazil and Chile?

@ 4. What about French Guiana so_far?]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:00:38 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Marcos Alejandro]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83450</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83450</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Mr Hague, anything else you wish to add? :-)))]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:07:20 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Jefferson's soul]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83451</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83451</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[@5: I never said "everybody" ;-(    you need glasses

Anybody means anybody]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:09:44 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Crackpot]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83453</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83453</guid>
      <description><![CDATA["“Uruguay considers the Malvinas Islands as an English colonial possession in Latin America..”
 
That's nice to know. In other words, Uruguay doesn't consider the Islands to be part of Argentina.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:17:21 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[M_of_FI]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83455</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83455</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[@7, semantics Jefferson, everybody and anybody in the context of what you were saying means the same thing.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:20:05 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[so_far]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83457</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83457</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[no country is reclaming "Guiana".....France was more clever, fair and astute in his move....they´re in peace in the region....even with Malvinas they act with dignity long time ago when they "cede" their rights to Spain...the only one DIRTY here is UK who (like allways) broke NOOTKA.....allways England acting outlaw, disgusting and the main reason we´re talking with this madness situation.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:28:13 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[xbarilox]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83465</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83465</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[@10
When we stole the land from Paraguay, was Paraguay's fault too? We're not that nice so_far.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:54:27 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Jefferson's soul]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83466</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83466</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[@9  You need Glasses M_of_FI !!!.  

Anybody and Everybody are two different words... 
Besides glasses, you also need some grammar lessons, English is not my mother tongue so any mistake I can make is acceptable

Or should I say "Every" Mistake is acceptable?
Do you see the difference?]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:55:09 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Crackpot]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83469</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83469</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[@10: So_facile:
The only reason French Guiana is not been claimed by anyone is that Argentina is not next to it. The Brazilians are obviously far more reasonable people. There was a border dispute, but that was settled amicably.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:03:17 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Jefferson's soul]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83475</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83475</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[@M_of_FI:

This is an interesting link where you can find the answers and also practice your English

http://www.englishpractice.com/grammar/somebody-someone-anybody-anyone-etc/

Hope this helps--]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:18:38 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Malvinero1]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83499</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83499</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[#13:The only reason French Guiana is not been claimed by anyone is that Argentina is not next to it. 
AHHHHAHHAHAHHAHHAHAH! We are not easily frighten,by the bully pirates brits.1806/1807/1840..the brits never succeeded in dominating Argentina,and certainly,we WILL RECOVER MALVINAS!! We inherited and we were there...The brits pirats,signed the 1825 treaty of frienship and commerce,WHAT A PRICK the brits,MY GOD!]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:49:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[JustinKuntz]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83500</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83500</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Actually it was Spain that unilaterally repudiated the Nootka Convention in 1795.  Irrelevant anyway as it was never intended to include the Falkland Islands.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:52:50 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Pugol-H]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83504</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83504</guid>
      <description><![CDATA["solidarity based on close historical and cultural fraternity links"

So definately a "Gringo thing" .]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:54:09 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[xbarilox]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83505</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83505</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[@ 15 You are like a little girl crying over a barbie doll when her mommy doesn't have money enough to buy it. Have some dignity, please.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:55:43 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[M_of_FI]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83529</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83529</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[@10...French Guiana is still a colony of France.  I thought South America is trying to eradicate colonies from South America?  French Guiana is considered mainland France.  Its currency is the Euro.  It is governed from Paris.  It is the only colony in South America.

@12.  I understand they are different words, but the context of your statement wont differ with the use of either word.  But lets rejoice in your victory!  By using petty semantics you win!  Well done Jefferson, but unfortunately is doesnt assist your country's quest in colonising the Falklands.  Terrible shame!  And thanks for the English lessons, they are much better than an Argentine's history lesson.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:32:33 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Crackpot]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83549</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83549</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[@15 Mal vino: "the brits never succeeded in dominating Argentina.."

You seem to have conveniently erased the events of 1982 from your memory.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:26:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Pugol-H]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83550</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83550</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[What memory!]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:29:16 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[so_far]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83551</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83551</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[#20 Actually Cracky boy he´s right....in 1982 UK couldn´t win alone, on the contrary you were humillieated ........so you start to cry like babies for NATO, USA and Chile help....and only in THAT moment all together defeat Argentina. Thats a FACT

just as WWI
just as WWII
as allways....UK NEVER EVER fight alone.......and thats a FACT too.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:33:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[J.A. Roberts]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83555</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83555</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Sofa. Argentina was not a signatory to Nootka, mainly because Argentina did not exist when Nootka was signed, so cannot benefit from Nootka.  There's a fact for you to understand.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:40:48 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[briton]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83558</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83558</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[to tell a lie is not to be belived again,
you know very well that argentina also had help in 1982,
the difference was
that britain recieved technicle help
and argentina recieved direct help from peru, did she  not,
who helped  who is irrelivent, the result still stands
you lost,]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:45:49 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Conqueror]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83570</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83570</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[And the Uruguayan position is?  Being bent over and shafted in the butt by Argentina.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:00:05 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Yuleno]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83596</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83596</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[You like the butt conqueror.Do you get some.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:08:16 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Brasileiro]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83601</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83601</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[South America is ONE! Cisplatine Province it is South America. Chile do trade with us too. Chile its South America. Brazil its South America. SOUTH AMERICA IS ONLY ONE! ONE CONTINENT, ONLY ONE COUNTRY! Malvinas its South America too, no english. And, Scotland will be free too!!!]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:18:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Crackpot]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83603</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83603</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[@22 so_facile:

We can't help it if everyone thinks that we are fabulous and wants to help us out a bit now and then. It's called having friends and allies and it's a useful weapon in the fight against tinpot third world countries with delusions of grandeur. Not that we got too much assistance in 1982 anyway (as you well know).

You definitely have a very unusual concept of humilation. So, I ran to my dictionary to double-check that I hadn't got it wrong. It read: "HUMILIATION (noun). Definition: the state or feeling of being humiliated (ie, experiencing reduced or hurt dignity or pride), as happened to Argentina in 1982."]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:24:51 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Brasileiro]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83607</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83607</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Long live to THIRD WORLD! The promissed land is here!]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:36:40 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[briton]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83608</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83608</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[We see the indoctrination studies are having some effect on some brazilin friends,
He to thinks south America, one country one government,
Run by Argentina .
As for Scot, that’s our problem, you have enough .]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:37:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Brasileiro]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83611</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83611</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Scotland no more your problem. In 2014, in day of Batlle Blackburn, Scotland will be free too. England no more rules the world. And, Brazil and all Soth América, like to Prússia and Germanies Kingdons, will be a ONLY COUNTRY]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:41:32 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[briton]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83615</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83615</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[yeh and CFK will rule over brazil.
and pigs fly]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:04:31 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Brasileiro]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83618</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83618</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The england citzen, named Briton, dont have more arguments?]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:24:19 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[rmalone]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83643</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83643</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Este Willy se les rie en la cara a estos pobres tipos que tienen encerrados en las islas...
SIIII OKUPAS... PAPA NOEL EXISTE.... jajajajajja]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 05:26:16 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[lsolde]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83646</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83646</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Don't mind him, briton. He's just another silly malvinista who knows jack s... as our American cousins say!
@31 Brasileiro,
Scotland is free to leave the UK whenever they feel like it.
No one is going to try to stop them, so what is your problem?
@22 so_far,
You forgot the Chinese laundrymen on the British ships, brad.
Don't tell geo, but they were actually Chinese Special Forces on our side!
You want to check that "solidarity" with China, mate.
They're just using you to help get Taiwan.
@15 Malvinero1,
Oh no, you regressed. Your fingers just can't lift themselves from the keyboard, can they? You have my sympathy.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 05:48:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Malvinero1]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83657</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83657</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[You seem to have conveniently erased the events of 1982 from your memory.
cpotty: You won a battle,not the war......We still have Argentina,wich the brits,they will ever,never have..
You just have a desolated subantartic island,thatt you will loose....No question about that...]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:58:05 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[briton]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83670</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83670</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[32 briton 35 lsolde  thanks
he want something else that is not theirs,
another brainwashed person .]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:22:49 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Crackpot]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83674</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83674</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[@36: Mal vino:

What of Earth would we want Argentina for? That was never part of the equation. We didn't keep Germany after the end of WW2. We just kept what was ours.

Correct me if I'm wrong but the "battle" as you like to call it was over the Falkland Islands (those Islands that you class as part of Argentina). You lost. Get over it and move on. Whether it was a battle or a war in 1982, nobody could deny that it was an utterly humilating defeat for Argentina. The UK has had its fair share of miltary defeats in the past - the country accepted them, learned from them and moved on. Denying it will only make things harder for you. 

Does it also mean that you think the UK and Argentina are still at war and somehow you're going to miracualously pull a victory from the jaws of defeat. You lost a long time ago. Try to accept reality.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:41:46 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[briton]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83694</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83694</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[well if you dont think being beaten by an little island race, a fraction of your size,
is humiliating,
perhaps you think the mighty navy you have stopping unarmed fishing boats is a victory,

ah well, some mothers have them ?
     children  i mean ?.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:48:40 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Pugol-H]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83697</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83697</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[@34 rmalone 
Has nobody told you, there is no such thing as:
father xmas
slightly pregnant
a temporary tax
military inteligence
money in birthday cards
or the malvinas
They are all mythical.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:57:33 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Beef]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83711</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83711</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Malviner - 1982 was a war with a beginning and an end. Argentina started it and Argentina ended it by signing what was in effect an unconditional surrender. Sorry about being better than you, it is just the result of natural selection.

The only victory you are now claiming is the banning of a piece of fabric on some fishing boats that can happily fly another one of the Red Ensign family and enter any port they wish. These ships remain FI registered. If you call that a victory then you are either easily pleased or have exceptionally low standards.

What war are you fighting now because I don't see one?

Ten days until the Leiv Eriksson arrives :-) Not very good at getting your own way are you?]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:56:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Pugol-H]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83716</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83716</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Technicaly speaking 1982 was a conflict, involving battles such as goose green for example, for a war there has to be a declaration of war. 

I think wot malviner means is the struggle is not over.

war is after all an extension of diplomacy.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:14:22 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[briton]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83750</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83750</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[And the struggle  is the aftermath of the men in white coats, is it not,
Mind you my dau, did see the tooth fairy, [didn’t she??]
or was mummy’s fairy ?]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:53:39 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[lsolde]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83799</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83799</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Malvinero1, the "implanted" ltalian, who can't accept that he was defeated.
Move on, boy. Forget the past. Make something of your new country.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:46:15 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[briton]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83803</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83803</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[or you will end up like your hero,
hung like a chicken .]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:53:14 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Crackpot]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83806</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83806</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[@45 briton

I heard that he already was "hung like a chicken".]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[briton]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83834</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment83834</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[no wonder he has his head ???]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:21:41 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Philippe]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment84013</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment84013</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Granted that the Falklands flag is part of an "Injusticialist"-Argentinian blockade.
But since there is only a so-called fiction-"malvinas,"  then do the Falklands really exist, do they?!
Now to add to the Injusticialist confusion, one could ask, what about postage stamps? Suppose they show the Falklands flag, will they be allowed to "violate" Argentina's fascistic air/sea blockade?
Apologies, but I find Argentina every day more and more, and more confusing!

Philippe]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 20:38:46 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[briton]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment84035</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment84035</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[So does the world,]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:54:44 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Kipling]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment84137</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment84137</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/elpais/1-185509-2012-01-15.html
People from MERCOPRESS.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:50:18 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[briton]]></title>
      <link>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment84163</link>
      <guid>http://en.mercopress.com/2012/01/12/uruguay-s-position-on-barring-malvinas-flagged-vessels-has-not-changed-an-iota#comment84163</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[argentina.indocrination.com
people from never never land .]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:45:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>    
  </channel>
</rss>