Wednesday, July 25th 2012 - 07:42 UTC

Greenland’s massive ice sheet “unprecedented” melt puzzles Nasa scientists

Greenland's massive ice sheet has melted this month over an usually large area, Nasa has said. Scientists said the “unprecedented” melting took place over a larger area that ever detected in three decades of satellite observation.

The thawed ice area jumped from 40% to 97% of the ice sheet in four days

Melting even occurred at Greenland's coldest and highest place, Summit station. The thawed ice area jumped from 40% of the ice sheet to 97% in just four days from 8 July.

Although about half of Greenland's ice sheet normally melts over the summer months, the speed and scale of this year's melting surprised scientists, who described the phenomenon as “extraordinary”.

Nasa said that nearly the entire ice cover of Greenland, from its thin, low-lying coastal edges to its centre, which is 3km thick, experienced some degree of melting at its surface.

“When we see melt in places that we haven't seen before, at least in a long period of time, it makes you sit up and ask what's happening?” Nasa chief scientist Waleed Abdalati said.

“It's a big signal, the meaning of which we're going to sort out for years to come.”

He said that because this Greenland-wide melting has happened before they are not yet able to determine whether this is a natural but rare event, or if it has been sparked by man-made global warming.

Scientists said they believed that much of Greenland's ice was already freezing again.

Until now, the most extensive melting seen by satellites in the past three decades was about 55% of the area. Ice last melted at Summit station in 1889, ice core records show.

The news comes just days after Nasa satellite imagery revealed that a massive iceberg, twice the size of Manhattan, had broken off a glacier in Greenland.

“This event, combined with other natural but uncommon phenomena, such as the large calving event last week on Petermann Glacier, are part of a complex story,” said Nasa's Tom Wagner.
 

12 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.

1 Yomp to victory (#) Jul 25th, 2012 - 08:17 am Report abuse
I blame all the hot air being expelled from Cristina 'the La Plata whore' de Kirchner's various sagging orifices.
2 DennisA (#) Jul 25th, 2012 - 08:51 am Report abuse
Anthony Watts had a look at this on Wattsupwiththat:

”I had to laugh at the title of their press release, where they cite “Unprecedented Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Melt”, then contradict themselves when the main researcher goes on to say “melting events of this type occur about once every 150 years on average. With the last one happening in 1889“. Do these guys even read their own press releases?

Says it all.
3 lsolde (#) Jul 25th, 2012 - 11:10 am Report abuse
@1 Yomp to victory,
Would that be “orifi”
-or is that cockney for “to frighten”!
4 Idlehands (#) Jul 25th, 2012 - 12:10 pm Report abuse
No the plural ends with an “s” - but I had to think about your post for a bit to understand it. A clever use of language.
5 Yomp to victory (#) Jul 25th, 2012 - 04:44 pm Report abuse
lsolde

No, per the OED, the plural of 'orifice' is indisputably 'orifices'. .. and even if you were clinging to Latin, it would be 'orificia', not 'orifi' :)
6 lsolde (#) Jul 25th, 2012 - 08:40 pm Report abuse
@5 Yomp to victory,
Just joking,
lt was a pun.
lt was 'orrible.
7 Yomp to victory (#) Jul 25th, 2012 - 09:44 pm Report abuse
I know ;)
8 briton (#) Jul 25th, 2012 - 10:05 pm Report abuse
As long as this ice sheet never reaches the south atlantic,

or you know what CFK will do,

yes you guessed,
its mine its mine .
9 British_Kirchnerist (#) Jul 25th, 2012 - 11:27 pm Report abuse
#1 I blame the environmentally destructive practices of imperialist capitalism, of which Cristina can be proud to be called an enemy
10 GeoffWard2 (#) Jul 26th, 2012 - 03:11 pm Report abuse
Probably something to do with the unusual and stable position of the N Atlantic part of the jet stream - that bit that brought months of massive high temps to USA and low temp/rains to the UK. This jet stream re-located in mid July, bringing sun & heat to the UK ... and probably cooler air (
11 lsolde (#) Jul 26th, 2012 - 08:25 pm Report abuse
@10 GeoffWard2,
Do you mean to say that we can't blame the malvinistas for this?
Damn!
12 GeoffWard2 (#) Jul 27th, 2012 - 09:23 am Report abuse
Isolde
One of our number believes the Americas is One Continent, giving 'certain people' the right to claim the offshore islands.
We wait expectantly for CFK to lodge a claim for Greenland.
Perhaps Chavez will also find time to claim the Caribbean islands.
Proximity is a very elastic word.

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!

Advertisement

Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!