Saturday, September 8th 2012 - 05:26 UTC

Bolivia will formally request Mercosur full membership in 2013

Bolivia will begin the coming year formal talks for full membership of Mercosur, for which it has the support from Uruguay, said diplomatic sources from both countries, Bolivian Deputy Foreign minister Juan Carlos Alurralde met with his Uruguayan counterpart Roberto Conde in the framework of the “Bolivia-Uruguay coordination and consultation mechanism” sixth meeting in La Paz.

Deputy Foreign minister Alurralde made the announcement during talks with his Uruguayan counterpart Conde

“We can’t forget that Uruguay will be holding the chair of Mercosur next year and starting January 2013 a host of activities are going to be defined including a critical path for Bolivia to join the group as a full member”, said Alurralde.

Conde said Uruguay will offer all its support for Bolivia’s incorporation and facilitate the process, helping the country “not to lose any of the trade preferences it enjoys with other accords with third countries”. 

“It’s a matter of not making Bolivia pay a price or lose those accords it has achieved in international trade talks because of its decision to join Mercosur. In this Uruguay will offer its support particularly in the negotiations process”, added Conde.

Mercosur is made up of Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, Paraguay, suspended because of the removal following political impeachment of Fernando Lugo from the presidency, and Venezuela admitted during the dictated absence of Paraguay.

Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Peru and Ecuador are associate members while Venezuela joined officially last July 31st.

The two top officials also talked about Uruguay’s port facilities for land-locked Bolivia which would enable La Paz to use them for storage “with no need to pay any tariffs when they are moved” to the Atlantic ocean.

Another issue was the construction of a pipeline to supply Bolivian natural gas to Paraguay and Uruguay. The two year old project, still in the blueprint, would extend from the wells in southern Bolivia to the Paraguayan capital Asuncion and Montevideo.

However Conde admitted that at the moment investing in a gas pipeline “does not justify the cost” if it will only supply Uruguay. But if some other system could be implemented including an export terminal, using the Paraguay-Parana rivers water-way, then “it would be a viable option”.

“A gas pipeline for Uruguay only is not commercially viable, unless we have an export terminal making use of the ample port facilities in Montevideo. But we must first build a market for the export of Bolivian natural gas”, said Conde.

Other issues addressed at the bilateral meeting included agriculture, defence, health, migration, trade, tourism and investments.
 

17 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.

1 GeoffWard2 (#) Sep 08th, 2012 - 11:15 am Report abuse
First Venezuela,
then Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Peru and Ecuador,
then the rest of South America,
then Central America,
then the Caribbean ...

Once Merosur becomes the same as Unasur,
and then becomes the same as the OAS (minus the big boys),
then trade blocs become the same as economic blocs become the same as political blocs ...
become totally unable to operate coherently politically, economically or trade-wise. The only coherence will be hot air and exhortations and, because the bloc rules just can't work, the whole region becomes black economy, black trade and black politics.

But this is The Americas (minus the big boys),
and hot air and exhortations is the stock in trade of the 'coherent Left'.

Simon Bolivar, the darling of the Left (strange, because he has more in common with the fascist SA Right) would be intrigued to see the all-embracing chaos across this part of the world that his 'philosophy' is leading to under the influence of Hugo Chavez and his acolytes.
2 ChrisR (#) Sep 08th, 2012 - 12:01 pm Report abuse
@1

Excellent post, especially about the malignant effect of Venezuela.
3 LightThink (#) Sep 08th, 2012 - 02:11 pm Report abuse
Noo....

dont take it seriously as a economic/trade bloc.

just ahead of a kind of “” Regional Energy Bloc “” which is very normal to defend themself in the form of semi cartelization.
4 Sergio Vega (#) Sep 08th, 2012 - 05:25 pm Report abuse
Wow....Mercosur falling down rhe hill......!!!
Hope our country never will ask for full membership....Chile don't need them to be a developing country....Better alone that with bad company...you know..!!!!
5 LightThink (#) Sep 08th, 2012 - 05:37 pm Report abuse
Sergio

Pope loves which country more !....Chile ?...Argentina ?

abruptly i remembered that

in 1984 Chile and Argentina settled their long standing dispute over three island in the Beagle Channel off the southern tip of the Terra del Fuego,this dispute that had brought these two countries to the brink of war....a Papal mediation ruled for Chile and Argentina accepted the decision......
6 row82 (#) Sep 08th, 2012 - 06:28 pm Report abuse
Please support this page - Falkland Islands Desire The Right - dedicated to Falkland Islands current affairs, keeping the islands free and poking fun at the lunacy of the Argentine government and their various claims and winding up their Internet trolls - www.facebook.com/Britain1592
7 ChrisR (#) Sep 08th, 2012 - 06:32 pm Report abuse
@5

And just why would any country use the offices of El Diablo?

Consistently denied the systematic buggering of choir and alter boys by his illusterous clergy. At least they were not wankers, they were ten times worse.
8 ManRod (#) Sep 08th, 2012 - 06:49 pm Report abuse
Club of Losers almost complete!
Only Nicaragua and Cuba missing...
9 Captain Poppy (#) Sep 08th, 2012 - 10:50 pm Report abuse
www.economist.com/node/21558609

RIP MERCOSUR
10 British_Kirchnerist (#) Sep 09th, 2012 - 06:02 am Report abuse
Wasn't this the same way the EU started, with economic (the original name was the European Coal and Steal Community wasn't it, snappy!) and political blocs converging as more members joined each? So I don't see why the same thing that strengthened European unity should weaken unity between the progressive countrues of South America...
11 Elena (#) Sep 09th, 2012 - 08:48 am Report abuse
Well, I am happy to see Uruguay having its chance as bridge and pro tempore president of mercosur, a good trade deal for Bolivia that is equitative as well as an acces to ports, tourism and development of their resources are good news for them, Uruguay and Mercosur :)
12 GeoffWard2 (#) Sep 09th, 2012 - 09:48 am Report abuse
I guess if any country tries to stop this serial expansion across the Americas, there will be a 'temporary removal' of that country from the club, pending the arrival of a suitably Left-wing regime willing to play to the club-rules.
13 Elena (#) Sep 09th, 2012 - 02:43 pm Report abuse
Indeed that can be a problem, that is why I find Uruguay chosen place in mercosur as a bridge, an interesting and neccesary situation, given its role after Venezuela inclusion in mercosur has been that of a country making relations easier beetween neighbors, and even its searching to make an understanding between the Pacific Alliance and Mercosur so Latam doens´t gets parted in two, both blocs have much more to gain from a good relationship than a bad one.

The exclusion of Paraguay from mercosur is more hurting for the Bloc in the long run than for the country itself IMO, as Mujica said, Mercosur needs to be more flexible, and maybe get a more clear way of intereacting with countries in and out of mercosur if it wishes to grow as an economic bloc. Not doing that will only result in countries from the region symply seeking help or support from other places and blocs such as Unasur, Alba, Pacific Alliance, OAS, etc. Ideally, Unasur would have been a better place to discuss Paraguay situation than Mercosur.
14 GeoffWard2 (#) Sep 09th, 2012 - 04:12 pm Report abuse
“Unasur would have been a better place to discuss Paraguay situation than Mercosur.” #13

There is only one supra-national organisation designed for this local matter:

It should have been discussed within Parlasur, the supernational legislature (policy and political organisation) of the Mercosur nations.

Mercosur - a 'customs organisation' - was entirely inappropriate;
and so was Unasur, because it contains many nations with no legal interest in the region.
15 Pugol-H (#) Sep 09th, 2012 - 05:32 pm Report abuse
Another lurch to the left for a murcosur which is increasingly politically orientated, and less and less trade focused.

Unlikely the EU will be signing any trade deals with murcosur any time soon.

It will be interesting to see how it competes for space with the many other regional organisations, however how things develop with the Pacific alliance will be the big question.

As for the gas pipeline, Argentina may be interested in buying gas.
16 aussie sunshine (#) Sep 09th, 2012 - 07:24 pm Report abuse
Good to see a unified South America coming together...a future mayor player in world affairs.
17 Captain Poppy (#) Sep 09th, 2012 - 10:38 pm Report abuse
Mercosur is the next up and comer.....I mean they signed two freaking deals already!!! golly......and one was with the Palestinian Authority..........the clout they carry now!!

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!

Advertisement

Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!

Advertisement