Wednesday, September 12th 2012 - 01:58 UTC

Plans to preserve the legacy of the Royal Navy’s Invincible class aircraft carriers

Plans to preserve the legacy of the Royal Navy's Invincible Class aircraft carriers have been outlined. HMS Invincible, HMS Illustrious and HMS Ark Royal came into service in the early 1980s and have spent the last thirty years protecting the UK's interests across the world.

The last of the ships to be decommissioned, HMS Illustrious, is due to retire from the Royal Navy in 2014

The last of the ships to be decommissioned, HMS Illustrious, is due to retire from the Royal Navy in 2014 and the MOD is announcing the intention to seek proposals from organisations interested in preserving her as a lasting tribute to the work of the Invincible Class, which have played key roles in conflicts in the Falkland Islands, Iraq and Bosnia.

HMS Invincible was decommissioned in 2005 and later recycled. The 31-year-old HMS Ark Royal was withdrawn from service last year, following the 2010 Strategic Defence and Security Review. The MOD announced that she will also be recycled as part of a £2.9m deal with Leyal, the same company responsible for recycling Invincible in 2011.

Minister for Defence Equipment, Support and Technology Philip Dunne said that it is important to preserve the legacy of the Royal Navy's Invincible Class aircraft carriers.

“When the last of these - HMS Illustrious - retires from the Royal Navy, we would like to see her preserved as a legacy to the work she, Invincible and Ark Royal have done to protect the UK over three decades.

“We would be keen to seek innovative proposals from a range of organisations, including private sector companies, charities and trusts.

”HMS Ark Royal, like her sister ships, served this country with great distinction. Retiring her five years earlier than planned was a difficult decision but it was the right one that, combined with her sale, has saved over a hundred million pounds. That has helped the MOD achieve a sustainable and balanced budget for the first time in decades.

“The Royal Navy's new Queen Elizabeth Class carriers and the Lightning II aircraft that will fly off them are among the biggest projects of the now fully funded equipment program that will see around £160bn spent on equipment and support for our Armed Forces of the future.”

Preparatory work will be carried out on HMS Ark Royal over the winter to enable her to travel from Portsmouth to Turkey, where she will be recycled, at the same location where HMS Invincible was also recycled. Bids received for further use for HMS Ark Royal were considered but were judged either not feasible or appropriate, or carried too much risk.

As the out of service date for HMS Illustrious approaches, the MOD will look to industry to provide viable proposals to keep her available for future private use in a different capacity while still offering taxpayers good value for money.
 

25 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.

1 Boovis (#) Sep 12th, 2012 - 05:08 am Report abuse
Bulwark, Ocean and Albion can still provide a good amount of cover for most operations which should protect UK interests in most circumstances. I think the absence of an aircraft carrier has been analysed in a bit too panicky a fashion. Most anti air and sea ships can deal with a basic threat from a reasonable distance and as long as the aggressors aren't anyone major like russia, china or any decent sized forces like that, I'm not sure the threat is as big as people fear. Mind you, we said that in the 1930's...
2 Santa Fe (#) Sep 12th, 2012 - 06:59 am Report abuse
And we still have Lusty & Ocean plus RFA Argus which is pretty useful for carrying helos.
Not long to wait for our 2 new supercarriers RGs :)
3 Boovis (#) Sep 12th, 2012 - 08:50 am Report abuse
If I'm still living abroad when the new ships are due to launch I might even consider flying home to see it, it should be pretty amazing :)
4 JuanGabriel (#) Sep 12th, 2012 - 08:57 am Report abuse
If we are to believe some of the conspiracy theorists Illustrious is actually Ark Royal anyway, Invincible is Illustrious, Ark Royal is the secret ship built in 4 weeks without anyone knowing and the real Invincible is at the bottom of the South Atlantic
5 Boovis (#) Sep 12th, 2012 - 09:07 am Report abuse
I'm Spartacus.
6 Conqueror (#) Sep 12th, 2012 - 11:29 am Report abuse
@4 I think you're understating things. I had to actually go back and check but it appears that the argies claimed to have attacked and sunk Invincible no less than SIX times. It's quite amazing how Invincible, Ark Royal and Illustrious are all still visible. That means that Britain built, equipped and deployed SIX additional aircraft carriers between 2nd April and 14th June 1982! God, we're good! The only reason that our new 65,000 tonne carriers are taking so long is because of the number of items that have to be gold-plated. All the cutlery, of course. The toilet handles. The taps.
7 Santa Fe (#) Sep 12th, 2012 - 11:56 am Report abuse
www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?163878-Queen-Elizabeth-Class-Aircraft-Carriers-News-and-Discussion/page477

6- Now they have finished fart @rsing around in the mod and made a decision on the planes , the build is going very well and ahead of schedule :)

Wasn't one thread we got a carrier build in the USA in a couple of months, commissioned them crewed them (all in top secret) then steamed down to the Falklands.
8 briton (#) Sep 12th, 2012 - 12:13 pm Report abuse
We are very surprised that the Argies have not claimed to have sunk the ELIZABETH before she is even built .lol..
9 Boovis (#) Sep 12th, 2012 - 12:44 pm Report abuse
They sank the Invincible six times and you hardly hear a peep from us, we sank the belgrano once and they won't shut up about it; go figure.
10 Anbar (#) Sep 12th, 2012 - 01:21 pm Report abuse
“If we are to believe some of the conspiracy theorists Illustrious is actually Ark Royal anyway, Invincible is Illustrious, Ark Royal is the secret ship built in 4 weeks without anyone knowing and the real Invincible is at the bottom of the South Atlantic”

“We are very surprised that the Argies have not claimed to have sunk the ELIZABETH before she is even built”

“They sank the Invincible six times and you hardly hear a peep from us, we sank the belgrano once and they won't shut up about it; go figure.”

roflmao
11 Idlehands (#) Sep 12th, 2012 - 03:23 pm Report abuse
I think the best use for these old ships is to sink them to create artificial reefs. Good for sea life and good economics as a tourist attraction. Imagine the opportunity to dive an aircraft carrier. It's a shame that the greatest ships always sink in the wrong place. Couldn't the Germans on the Bismark have had a bit of forethought and chugged closer to the English coastline once they knew they were going down?
12 Rufus (#) Sep 12th, 2012 - 03:41 pm Report abuse
@11 Idlehands

A good idea in theory, but you'd probably have to take all the “toxic nasties” out of them first, and by the time you've dismantled them that far there isn't really much structure left to sink as a reef.

A notable case in point was the Clemenceau, which basically had to be diced in order to get all of the asbestos, lead, mercury, PCBs and goodness only know what else out.
13 Idlehands (#) Sep 12th, 2012 - 03:52 pm Report abuse
The Americans do it quite a lot. They do have to be decontaminated but it is a common practice. One of the plans was to sink her off of Cornwall but apparently the admiralty couldn't stomach the thought of a televised sinking. Seemed like a stupid excuse to me - they weren't asking the captain to stay on board.
14 Conqueror (#) Sep 12th, 2012 - 05:34 pm Report abuse
How about sending Illustrious to the Falklands? I know that she just missed the Falklands Victory but she could stand in for HMS Invincible. Perhaps she could even be re-named. How would the Islanders feel? Supposedly, the Ark Royal will be scrapped for £3 million. Would the Islanders be prepared to pay a reasonable amount to have Illustrious at the Islands? Would the MoD and the Royal Navy be prepared to re-name her?
15 ProRG_American (#) Sep 13th, 2012 - 01:51 am Report abuse
A nice pirate ship always makes a good fit in a museum.
16 Boovis (#) Sep 13th, 2012 - 07:05 am Report abuse
@15 *yawn* I'm sorry I wasn't listening, did you say something?
17 Santa Fe (#) Sep 13th, 2012 - 11:33 am Report abuse
16...These are from the Trolls 'When you have run out of things to post'

others are ' Prince Harry Vegas jajajajaja' 'Malvinos Argenweener'
and 'george galloway jajajaja'
18 Rufus (#) Sep 13th, 2012 - 11:52 am Report abuse
@13 Idle

The Americans do, yes, but it depends on how the ships were put together in the first place. I think the American build philosophy allows for easier decontamination than the French did.

I've got no idea about how easy the Invincible class would be to clean prior to scuttling, but if it's practical then it sounds like an excellent idea. I think the Admiralty just get a bit squeamish when anything that flies (or has flown) a white ensign dissapears under the waves for the last time. Possibly if they packed the deck with politicians just before pulling the stoppers out it would help them...
19 Malvinero1 (#) Sep 14th, 2012 - 12:14 am Report abuse
Bulwark, Ocean and Albion can still provide a good amount of cover for most operations which should protect UK interests in most circumstances. I think the absence of an aircraft carrier has
Who cares.Still uk will be obliterated! uk =TERRORIST state!
20 Santa Fe (#) Sep 14th, 2012 - 07:36 am Report abuse
19- In the case of RG's you and whose army!!!

new one for the trolls

Princes Katherine boobies
21 briton (#) Sep 14th, 2012 - 06:30 pm Report abuse
Very Astute …
pinterest.com/navylookout/astute-class-submarines/
British power….
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Argentine toys .
www.sainsburys.co.uk/sol/shop/toys_and_nursery/baby_and_preschool/all_baby_preschool/123536374_captain_bath_boat.html?esrc=become&med=cse
.
22 British_Kirchnerist (#) Sep 16th, 2012 - 07:56 pm Report abuse
#17 What about George Galloway, he's a good guy and an impressive politician, if we had our act together like Latin America he'd probably be the president =)
23 Santa Fe (#) Sep 17th, 2012 - 11:21 am Report abuse
22...George Galloway, Princes Kate photos, Priiiiiiiince Harry Vegas jajajajajaja
24 British_Kirchnerist (#) Sep 17th, 2012 - 03:02 pm Report abuse
I don't care about Harry and Kate, and I only “care” about Galloway in that I appreciate his politics and he was mentioned on here already...
25 Santa Fe (#) Sep 17th, 2012 - 08:29 pm Report abuse
24... Your well suited to each other.

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!

Advertisement

Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!