Wednesday, October 3rd 2012 - 23:07 UTC

Australian Great Barrier Reef lost more than half its coral cover in last 27 years

The Australian Great Barrier Reef has lost more than half its coral cover in the past 27 years, a new study shows. Researchers analysed data on the condition of 217 individual reefs that make up the World Heritage Site.

Decline is attributed to storms, a coral-feeding starfish and bleaching linked to climate change

The results show that coral cover declined from 28.0% to 13.8% between 1985 and 2012. They attribute the decline to storms, a coral-feeding starfish and bleaching linked to climate change. The research is published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal.

Glen De'ath from the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) and colleagues determined that tropical cyclones - 34 in total since 1985 - were responsible for 48% of the damage, while outbreaks of the coral-feeding crown-of-thorns starfish accounted for 42%.

Two severe coral bleaching events in 1998 and 2002 due to ocean warming also had “major detrimental impacts” on the central and northern parts of the reef, the study found, putting the impact at 10%.

“This loss of over half of initial cover is of great concern, signifying habitat loss for the tens of thousands of species associated with tropical coral reefs,” the authors wrote in their study.

Co-author Hugh Sweatman said the findings, which were drawn from the world's largest ever reef monitoring project involving 2,258 separate surveys over 27 years, showed that coral could recover from such trauma.

“But recovery takes 10-20 years. At present, the intervals between the disturbances are generally too short for full recovery and that's causing the long-term losses,” Sweatman said.

John Gunn, head of AIMS, said it was difficult to stop the storms and bleaching but researchers could focus their short-term efforts on the crown-of-thorns starfish, which feasts on coral polyps and can devastate reef cover.

The study said improving water quality was key to controlling starfish outbreaks, with increased agricultural run-off such as fertiliser along the reef coast causing algal blooms that starfish larvae feed on.
 

17 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.

1 Truth_Telling_Troll (#) Oct 03rd, 2012 - 11:27 pm Report abuse
Another great contribution of Anglo stewardship of the lands they usurped.

The toll of damage these people have inflicted never grows smaller.
2 Ayayay (#) Oct 04th, 2012 - 03:16 am Report abuse
Environmental performance index 2012 environment.yale.edu/news/article/switzerland-ranks-at-top-of-2012-environmental-performance-index/
3 Britninja (#) Oct 04th, 2012 - 04:08 am Report abuse
Argentina forecast to be 112 out of 132 countries. Bottom of the class again haha.
4 Truth_Telling_Troll (#) Oct 04th, 2012 - 04:12 am Report abuse
And who believes in anglo-saxon lead rankings? They always place themselves at the top of these rankings, which of course means they have not a shread of factual objectivity and are nothing more than ethnic props.

It's funny you anglos think that any of us believe any such studies.

Do you believe Russian, Chinese or Arab studies on you? Why do you think you are different than them in using such studies for propaganda? You aren't.
5 Ayayay (#) Oct 04th, 2012 - 04:18 am Report abuse
I think I see your confusion.
1. Anglos are a minority in the U.S.
2. See one :)
6 Britninja (#) Oct 04th, 2012 - 04:19 am Report abuse
I had a feeling you'd come out with the same paranoid “they're all out to get us” spiel. So basically you'd only believe a report if it was issued by the Argentine authorities. Along the lines of INDEC I suppose...
7 Truth_Telling_Troll (#) Oct 04th, 2012 - 04:28 am Report abuse
@6

Why don't you believe Russian, Chinese, and other rankings?

Why is it always the other side that has to prove (or unprove, that's how crazy you people are), things?

Like clyde 15 told me last week “if we brits accuse you of being a thief, you have to disprove you aren't” ... that is your worldview anglos.

Pretty underwhelming.
8 Ayayay (#) Oct 04th, 2012 - 04:33 am Report abuse
seems like someone fell for the Australian-Anglo story when they make up stuff about the reefs (•-•).
9 Truth_Telling_Troll (#) Oct 04th, 2012 - 04:43 am Report abuse
What are Australians? Persian?

So lets see, back to topic:

1. British Forests? Completely hewn.
2. Falkland Island's Wolf (warrah?) Gone.
3. Tasmanian Tiger (thylacine?) Gone.
4. USA prairie ecosystem? Destroyed.
5. Arctic “penguin” (great alk) Gone.
6. Great barrier reef? Dissapearing.

Yes, anglos are so good at preserving the environment. Must be true because some posh anglo college says it is.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
10 Britninja (#) Oct 04th, 2012 - 04:58 am Report abuse
www.moon.com/destinations/argentina/background/the-land/environmental-issues

Water
Drinking water is normally potable, but a historical legacy of polluted waterways derives from, first, the proliferation of European livestock on the pampas, followed by the processing of hides and livestock, and then by heavy industry. The textbook case is Buenos Aires’s Riachuelo, in the working-class barrio of La Boca, which more closely resembles sludge than water; its bottom sediments, thanks to chemical runoff from factories here and in nearby Avellaneda, are an even greater toxic hazard.

Soil Conservation and Deforestation
Centuries of livestock impacts, both grazing and trampling, have caused serious erosion even in areas where there were never native forests, such as the pampas and the Patagonian steppes. Even today, some forested national parks—most notably Lanín and Los Glaciares—have been unable to eliminate grazing within their boundaries.

The hot-button forest issues, though, are in the northern subtropical forests. In Misiones Province, agricultural colonists and commercial tea and yerba mate plantations have cut over much of the selva misionera, a diverse, wildlife-rich rain forest that cannot easily reestablish itself when its natural recycling mechanisms are disturbed. In Jujuy and Salta Provinces, the yungas cloud forest on the edge of the Andes has already suffered deforestation from construction of a nearly pointless natural gas pipeline over the Andes to Chile, and from widespread clear-cutting to extract just a few prize timber species.

* * * *

Looks like Argentina isn't a shining exmaple to us all, tisk...
11 Truth_Telling_Troll (#) Oct 04th, 2012 - 05:04 am Report abuse
Dude, you are you kidding? Whatever they say is irrelevant end of story.

And besides... All of what you wrote applies only to countries that still have an ENVIRONMENT TO PROTECT!

You can't say any of that about the UK because there is nothing TO protect! Its all gone, the forests, the pristine grassland, the unpolluted flatland... NOTHING. All gone.
12 Britninja (#) Oct 04th, 2012 - 05:18 am Report abuse
“Whatever they say is irrelevant end of story.” And you really have to wonder why people have trouble taking you seriously? You're about as brainwashed and intractable as those Malvinista drones - endlessly bitching about the evil Anglos and their failings; totally rejecting that your country has the exact same failings, or worse.
13 Truth_Telling_Troll (#) Oct 04th, 2012 - 05:26 am Report abuse
Yes, I don't believe what Anglo sources say. Why should I?

No one has ever answered to me that question. That's all I need to know.
14 Clyde15 (#) Oct 04th, 2012 - 09:52 am Report abuse
So, the “Anglos” are responsible for Starfish, tropical cyclones and global warming. Even for you that is quite a biased statement !
15 Idlehands (#) Oct 04th, 2012 - 10:30 am Report abuse
14 Clyde15 - We rule and run the world - didn't you know (other than the lizard people of course)
16 pecurto (#) Oct 04th, 2012 - 10:49 am
Comment removed by the editor.
17 Conqueror (#) Oct 04th, 2012 - 11:30 am Report abuse
@1 What are you doing on here, TiT? It has nothing to do with you puerile, depraved genocides of South America. It has to do with Australia and Australians. Members of the (British) Commonwealth of Nations. It will also be of interest to Brits (obviously) and other members of the Commonwealth. A world-wide organisation, incidentally, with far more members than your piddling little LatAm ones.
@4 You don't have the intelligence to “believe” anything except the garbage put out by your “government”. But I may remind you of this!
@13 You're too thick to be bothered with. Typical argie centric! Never been beyond the outskirts of its hovels.

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!

Advertisement

Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!