Tuesday, October 9th 2012 - 04:02 UTC

Wikileaks Assange bail guarantors ordered to pay £ 93.000

Nine people who put up bail for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, including two members of the British aristocracy and a Nobel Prize winner, were ordered to pay 93,000 pounds on Monday after Assange took refuge in Ecuador's embassy.

The Australian is holed in at the Ecuadorian embassy in London

The guarantors - who include Nobel prize-winning biologist John Sulston - are liable for part of the 140,000 pound bail fee they pledged, Westminster Magistrate's Court ruled. They were given until Nov. 6 to pay up.

Assange, whose whistle-blowing website angered the United States by releasing thousands of US diplomatic cables, was arrested in December 2010 on an extradition warrant from Sweden where he is wanted for questioning over allegations of rape and sexual assault made by two women.

He denies wrongdoing and says he fears that if he is extradited to Sweden he could be transferred to the US where he could face criminal charges punishable by death.

The 41-year-old Australian broke the conditions of his bail when he entered the Ecuadorean embassy in June shortly after running out of legal options to avoid being sent to Sweden. He was later granted diplomatic asylum by Ecuador.

“Having seen and heard from the sureties, I cannot avoid taking some account of their integrity,” Judge Howard Riddle said of the nine guarantors.

“I accept that they trusted Mr Assange to surrender himself as required. I accept that they followed the proceedings and made necessary arrangements to remain in contact with him,” he said.

“However, they failed in their basic duty, to ensure his surrender. They must have understood the risk and the concerns of the courts.

”Both this court and the High Court assessed that there were substantial grounds to believe the defendant would abscond, and that the risk could only be met by stringent conditions including the sureties.“

Vaughan Smith - one of the nine, who housed Assange for 13 months after his arrest - argued for the entire group in court last week. He had said it should pay no money at all because the case had dragged on for much longer than expected and Assange had not warned the group's members before entering the embassy.

Each guarantor must now pay between 3,500 and 15,000 pounds, having originally pledged between 5,000 and 20,000 pounds. Three submitted details of their financial means, which were taken into consideration by the court.

”Nobody wants to lose 12,000 pounds and though my family may now live less comfortably, at least we will be able to live with ourselves,“ Smith said afterwards.

”We believe that we have done the right thing and have no regrets for having supported Julian Assange.”
 

15 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.

1 bushpilot (#) Oct 09th, 2012 - 05:58 am Report abuse
Pssst, Julian! Hey, Julian!

How are you doing in there?

You sure have some generous friends!
2 eteega (#) Oct 09th, 2012 - 09:22 am Report abuse
Assange will probably have a major health or mental breakdown and have to be removed to hospital where he will arrested and subsequently deported.
Concerning Ecuador Law....some laws are pitiful...try this one on:
Ecuador is a beautiful country with probably the worst possible traffic laws in the World.
There “no fault” approach to accidents can mean that if a suicidal motor cyclist drives in front of a bus loaded with passengers and the driver accidentally kills the motor cyclist, then the driver will end up in a barred windowless prison for up to 5 years! This could be in Quito, freezing in Winter and sweating in Summer. The traffic prisons offer no amenities so prisoners have to clean their own toilets, buy and cook their own food, etc., etc.
I personally know of an Ecuadorean female lawyer who accidentally killed a person in a road accident and immediately took a taxi to the airport and flew to New York...never to return to Ecuador....so much for Ecuadorian law...moral of the story...NEVER drive in Ecuador !!!
3 ElaineB (#) Oct 09th, 2012 - 09:45 am Report abuse
I think the Ecuadoreans have tried to think of every which way to get Assange out of their cramped offices. They asked the UK government if, theoretically, Assange were to be taken ill, could he leave the embassy and if it would be possible for him to be given safe passage to Ecuador. The answer in both cases was that if he sets foot outside the embassy he will be arrested. The UK have an obligation to abide by the extradition to Sweden as all possible legal routes in the UK have been exhausted.

Still, Assange had a visit from Lady Gaga last night. Two self-obsessed narcissists in the same room for hours, the parallel conversations must have been fascinating.
4 Conqueror (#) Oct 09th, 2012 - 11:50 am Report abuse
Didn't Ecuador say recently that Assange could be in their “embassy” for TEN years? (Note: The “embassy” is the people. The place where they operate is called a chancellery.) Glad to see that this article finally got something right. Ecuador gave Assange “diplomatic asylum”, a status unrecognised outside South America. Something to look forward to, eh, Julie? Wonder if all those people who've had to cough up because of your cowardice will want their money back? Anyhow, TEN years, FIFTEEN years, TWENTY years, makes no difference. You're still going to get arrested when you come out. And you're still going to Sweden. One possibility for coming out without being arrested. You can come out in a pine box. But we'll still look inside to make sure you're really there. And we'll still be there while they pile six feet of earth on top of your box.
5 GFace (#) Oct 09th, 2012 - 05:18 pm Report abuse
“Vaughan Smith - one of the nine, who housed Assange for 13 months after his arrest - argued for the entire group in court last week. He had said it should pay no money at all because the case had dragged on for much longer than expected and Assange had ***not warned the group's members before entering the embassy.***”

Jiminy Christmas, what did they expect?!? Anecdotal accounts present JA as a narcissistic jerk and very bad roommate (I feel badly for what the embassy staff in that relative small office space have to go through daily to accommodate him while having to put in a happy face to satisfy their superiors back home). Of *course* he was going to leave them hanging. He's on a mission. He is above them all.

Serves 'em right for standing behind someone who thinks publishing names of Belarus dissidents and “not 'rape' rape” is kewl.
6 ElaineB (#) Oct 09th, 2012 - 05:48 pm Report abuse
And the case only dragged on so long because of Assange's desperate attempt at avoiding facing questioning and investigation by the Swedes.

The bail was set so high because he was considered a flight risk.
7 briton (#) Oct 09th, 2012 - 07:28 pm Report abuse
Perhaps his backers could now sue Ecuador, for their money back .lol.
8 Conqueror (#) Oct 09th, 2012 - 07:37 pm Report abuse
What's the matter, dummies? You thought Assange was honest, integrous, trustworthy? You pays your money and you lose it. Because he's dishonest, fraudulent, lying, mendacious, narcissistic and self-indulgent. Not to mention a sexual predator with no morals. Let's do the world a favour. Shoot him dead!
9 ElaineB (#) Oct 09th, 2012 - 08:30 pm Report abuse
No need to shoot him. The worst thing you can do to someone with narcissistic personality disorder is to ignore them. They cannot stand it.
10 briton (#) Oct 09th, 2012 - 10:45 pm Report abuse
you mean like [adorable]
11 ChrisR (#) Oct 10th, 2012 - 12:27 am Report abuse
“”Nobody wants to lose 12,000 pounds and though my family may now live less comfortably, at least we will be able to live with ourselves, “ Smith said afterwards.”

What an absolute prat. What did he think was going to happen? He had the ego trip while Assange was sponging off him and he couldn't see the likely outcome? ‘He didn't tell us' he bleats! Ha, ha, ha.

I am still fully expecting Assange to suddenly 'fall ill' from an 'unknown source', at least the poor devils having to put up with his bleating about how unfair the world is could draw straws to administer the 'unknown source'.

Once he is outside in the ambulance he could expect to hear that well known pantomime saying “Allo, allo, what have we here, you’re nicked Sonny Jim”. There will be tears before bedtime!

LOLs
12 briton (#) Oct 10th, 2012 - 01:24 pm Report abuse
why did lady ga ga visit him,
why was she allowed,

this just gives him publicity
13 ElaineB (#) Oct 10th, 2012 - 02:06 pm Report abuse
@12 They are both famewhores.
14 briton (#) Oct 10th, 2012 - 05:19 pm Report abuse
mmm both losers then..
15 ChrisR (#) Oct 10th, 2012 - 05:53 pm Report abuse
Yeah, but Lady Gaga is the one with the bollocks.

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!

Advertisement

Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!

Advertisement