MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, November 18th 2018 - 12:20 UTC

Argentine flagged vessels catch of Illex squid totaled 186.969 tons, says Inidep

Monday, September 30th 2013 - 16:52 UTC
Full article 21 comments

A report from Argentina’s INIDEP (fisheries research institute) presented to the Fisheries Federal Council last week indicates that during 2013 Illex squid catches totalled 434.561 tons of which 156.163 were landed by 66 Argentine jiggers. The report identified as Number 20, refers to the first 35 weeks of this year, (1 to 35) and includes Argentine waters and outside Argentina’s Exclusive Economic Zone, ZEEA. Read full article

Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Britworker

    I certainly hope there were no British squid in that catch, where is that Malvinas place?

    Sep 30th, 2013 - 05:23 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • redp0ll

    Predators

    Sep 30th, 2013 - 06:55 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • The Truth PaTroll

    THE ONLY MAMMAL SPECIES THAT IS EXTICNT IN THE SOUTH ATLANTIC LIVED IN WHAT IS BRITISH CONTROLLED TERRITORY.

    :(

    Sep 30th, 2013 - 08:13 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Britworker

    Hmmm, squid to land mammals, don't see the connection

    Sep 30th, 2013 - 08:32 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • The Truth PaTroll

    I was answering the benighted individual @2.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falkland_Islands_wolf

    Sep 30th, 2013 - 08:43 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • JohnCFI

    Well, one must say that is a really good record when compared with the Argentine Mainland

    http://www.monitor.net/monitor/9706a/argentinaextinct.html.

    Oops, Own Goal by the malvinists!!

    Sep 30th, 2013 - 08:56 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • The Truth PaTroll

    Risk of extinction??? Same as EXTINCT?

    Comparing an island with only ONE MAMMAL vs the world's 7th largest country with HUNDREDS?

    OWN GOAL??

    LOL!

    Actually the Falklands has an execrable record, since 100% of all native mammal species there are extinct, that must surely be by leagues the worst.

    Sep 30th, 2013 - 09:02 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Britworker

    @7

    What the hell are you going on about, the Falkland Islands are packed with animal life and breeding bird populations. They didn't commit genocide to their own indigenous people unlike you.

    The story was about squid and the pathetic Argentine fisheries institute that refers to Falkland Islands as being part of their economic exclusion zone, which it will never be.

    Sep 30th, 2013 - 09:37 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • redp0ll

    Seals, whales . penguins? are they not maamals also? Last I heard they seemed to bit quite a lot of them. As to the warra. the Falklands fox, most of them were massacred by the rogue Argentine garrison for thier pelts
    Our werewolf from Mendoza is unfortunately not in danger of extinction as he has clones roaming the area all over the place
    Wow! Another triumph for Kirchernist genetic engineering. Hooray!

    Sep 30th, 2013 - 09:41 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • JohnCFI

    At least we didn't drive the indigenous population to near extinction..... oh no it called genocide when it's humans isn't it..

    Oct 01st, 2013 - 12:13 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • The Truth PaTroll

    You are BRITISH. And as such are just as the Americans and Canadians, who DID drive the indigenous population to extinction. Any indians in New York? Boston? Chicago? Washington?

    Not one in sight.

    Lets be intellectually clear, had there been indians in the Falklands, they would have joined the Warrah.

    Oct 01st, 2013 - 12:19 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • JohnCFI

    Ah but lets be correct, there were not and so they didn't!!

    And yes I am Falklands British, and very proud to be so.

    Oct 01st, 2013 - 01:31 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • The Truth PaTroll

    Well, when arrived in Mendoza, there were no indians to exterminate either. Sorry to disappoint.

    Oct 01st, 2013 - 01:39 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Marcos Alejandro

    2 redp0ll “Predators”
    I agree.

    ”The Falkland Islands(Malvinas) is South America’s most important penguin breeding site, but greed and corruption at the very highest level of government has resulted in the loss of over 5 million penguins”

    http://www.falklands.net/FalklandsCorruption.shtml

    Oct 01st, 2013 - 02:51 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • agent999

    @14

    Not the old (Dr.) Mike Bingham story again !!!!

    Oct 01st, 2013 - 07:50 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • lsolde

    Marcos really lives in the past, doesn't he.
    @11 PaTroll,
    “had there been lndians in the Falklands, they would have joined the Warrah”
    And if housebricks were gold bars, my house would be worth a fortune. ldiot.
    IF, IF, IF IF!

    Oct 01st, 2013 - 09:05 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • St.John

    @ 14 Marcos Alejandro who gives us a link to an article of very dubious value, as it also tells us: “Argentina declared possession of the Falklands in 1820”

    1. Argentina as a state did not exist in 1820
    2. Jewett's report does not mention any declaration of possession of the Falkland Islands. [1]

    [1] http://www.scribd.com/doc/170781399

    - - - - - - -

    @ 13 Toby Big Nostrils talking through his hat as usual:

    “Well, when arrived in Mendoza, there were no indians to exterminate either”

    Before the 1560s the Mendoza area was populated by three tribes, the Huarpes, the Puelches, and the Incas.

    It is estimated that fewer than 80 Spanish settlers lived in the area before 1600, but later prosperity increased due to the use of indigenous and slave labor, and the Jesuit presence in the region.

    1562 “La ciudad [de Mendoza] es rebautizada como ”Ciudad de la Resurrección en la Provincia de los Huarpes“”
    “Entre los ríos Barrancas y Diamante vivían los puelches, ...”
    Huarpes milcayac (en el norte de la provincia de Mendoza)
    Huarpes chiquillanes (en el sur de la provincia de Mendoza)
    Huarpes guanacache (en el noreste de Mendoza ...).

    Oct 01st, 2013 - 10:11 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Conqueror

    @13 Daddy already exterminated all the nasty Indians, did he? Was it him that got rid of the Puelches? How about the Inca Túpac Yupanqui? Murderer.
    @17 Somebody needs to explain how a pirate (Jewett) could enable a non-existent state to declare “possession” of a territory on which it left no representatives.
    Wonder when dumb argies will get the idea that people can check on things they say? And refute them. Will they eventually realise that they make their stupidity obvious? You can manage to wander down to the bar and spout what you like. Can't do that here!

    Oct 01st, 2013 - 11:54 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • The Truth PaTroll

    “Before the 1560s the Mendoza area was populated by three tribes, the Huarpes, the Puelches, and the Incas”

    WHEN I ARRIVED IN MENDOZA, there were no indians!! What part of that statement eludes you?

    Kinda sucks when others use your same reasoning as a boomerang. “No indians in the Falklands”, well guess what, no indians in Mendoza city when I arrived.

    Oct 01st, 2013 - 03:26 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • St.John

    @ 19 Toby Big Nostrils talking through his hat again.

    Where in # 13 does it say “when *I* arrived in Mendoza”?

    Full text of # 13: “Well, when arrived in Mendoza, there were no indians to exterminate either. Sorry to disappoint.”

    Is your Alzheimer so far advanced, that you don't even know what you write?

    Oct 01st, 2013 - 06:49 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • redp0ll

    Snotty talking through his blocked sinuses as usual. “WHEN i ARRIVED IN MENDOZA, there were no Indians” So a recien llegado blessing his Argentine prededeccors for killing them of perhaps?

    Oct 01st, 2013 - 09:02 pm - Link - Report abuse 0

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!