MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, November 13th 2018 - 07:54 UTC

EU regulators Russia's Gazprom of abusing dominant position; fine could reach 16bn

Friday, April 24th 2015 - 08:08 UTC
Full article 2 comments
“Gazprom may have built artificial barriers, …hindering cross-border competition,” said European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager “Gazprom may have built artificial barriers, …hindering cross-border competition,” said European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager
The Russian mega-company responded to the accusations, and said that it considers the claim against the company “unreasonable.” The Russian mega-company responded to the accusations, and said that it considers the claim against the company “unreasonable.”
Putin's press office said that “as a shareholder in Gazprom, the Russian state will defend its interests.” The company has 12 weeks to respond to the claim Putin's press office said that “as a shareholder in Gazprom, the Russian state will defend its interests.” The company has 12 weeks to respond to the claim
EU antitrust fines cannot exceed 10% of global yearly revenue, which for Gazprom in 2013 was 164.62bn, so it could have to pay a 16 billion fine. EU antitrust fines cannot exceed 10% of global yearly revenue, which for Gazprom in 2013 was 164.62bn, so it could have to pay a 16 billion fine.

Russia’s biggest gas utility, Gazprom, was hit with an antitrust case by European Union regulators for “abusing” its dominant position and overcharging customers for gas supplies. The investigation against the Gazprom has been ongoing for two years.

 ”We find that it (Gazprom) may have built artificial barriers preventing gas from flowing from certain Central Eastern European countries to others, hindering cross-border competition,“ European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager said in a statement. Vestager said there is no political element to the case.

Gazprom supplies about 30% of the natural gas used by the 28 countries of the EU.

Gazprom is under investigation for market dominance in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, and Bulgaria.

The Russian gas major has individual contracts with these countries that allow company to charge each a different price for gas supplies.

”Keeping national gas markets separate also allowed Gazprom to charge prices that we at this stage consider to be unfair,“ Vestager said.

Gazprom’s unfair prices partly result from the firm’s formula that link gas prices to oil product prices and “have unduly favored Gazprom over its customers,” the EC said.

With several clients, Gazprom has a ‘take-or-pay’ clause, which forces customers to pay for deliveries they may not necessarily need or use.

Gazprom responded to the accusations, and said that it considers the claim against the company ”unreasonable.“

“Gazprom considers the European Commission’s submitted claims baseless. At the same time, accepting the European Commission’s ‘Statement of Objections’ is just one phase of the anti-monopoly investigation, and does not mean that Gazprom is guilty of any violation of EU antitrust legislation,” the company said in a statement.

”We are hoping that a compromise will be found. Such issues should definitely be resolved through negotiations, and we are relying on an impartial attitude towards Gazprom,“ said Vladimir Putin's press secretary Dmitry Peskov. ”As a shareholder in Gazprom, the Russian state will defend its interests.”

The gas supplier has 12 weeks to respond to the claim and call a hearing.

EU antitrust fines cannot exceed 10% of global yearly revenue, which for Gazprom in 2013 was 164.62 billion Euros, so the EU could hit the company with a more than 16 billion fine. To compare, Google's maximum fine is €6 billion.

The EU has been discussing the creation of an ‘energy union’ which would force companies like Gazprom to sell gas supplies at a fixed rate to the entire 28-nation bloc.

The European Union first launched an investigation into Gazprom in 2012, blaming Russia’s biggest gas producer for anti-competitive practices in Central and Eastern Europe. It said Gazprom was hindering the free flow of gas to member nations, preventing the diversification of gas supplies, and imposing unfair prices on customers by linking the price of gas to oil prices.

The antitrust case against Gazprom comes just days after the commission launched a similar case against American search supremo Google for abusing its dominance in the European market.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • ChrisR

    Wht the word 'may'?

    Doesn't Vestager KNOW if they ”built artificial barriers preventing gas from flowing from certain Central Eastern European countries to others, hindering cross-border competition,“?

    Isn't this the first step in any investigation: to find the evidence, even if it has taken two years?

    Apr 24th, 2015 - 11:11 am 0
  • Briton

    What if Russia turns the tap of.
    just a thought.

    Apr 24th, 2015 - 06:36 pm 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!