MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, November 22nd 2018 - 10:57 UTC

Brazilian Justice gives Rousseff ten days to reply the claims of “a coup”

Thursday, May 19th 2016 - 12:07 UTC
Full article 13 comments
Justice Rosa Weber follows a presentation by a group of lawmakers from the current wide ranging coalition that supports acting president Temer Justice Rosa Weber follows a presentation by a group of lawmakers from the current wide ranging coalition that supports acting president Temer
According to the presentation, Rousseff has tarnished the standing of Brazil's House and this is “something of an unparallel seriousness” According to the presentation, Rousseff has tarnished the standing of Brazil's House and this is “something of an unparallel seriousness”
Furthermore on the official May first speech on national television, the suspended president mentioned the word “coup” fifteen times Furthermore on the official May first speech on national television, the suspended president mentioned the word “coup” fifteen times

Brazils Supreme Tribunal (STF) Justice Rosa Weber has given suspended president Dilma Rousseff ten days to explain her repeated statements that the impeachment process started against her is a “coup”. Rousseff is not obliged to respond. The STF decision follows a request from a group of lawmakers via the House's prosecution office.

 The Justice pointed out that the decision does not mean a reprimand of the suspended president. “The judicial action which analyzes a criminal interpretation does not mean a value judgement on the contents debated, since it represents a typical providence of cognitive contention” said Justice Weber.

The claim was presented by lawmakers currently members of the wide ranging coalition that supports the government of interim president Michel Temer. They request that the suspended president confirms she is the victim of an alleged “coup”, and if so who are responsible for such ilegallity.

According to the presentation, Rousseff with her statements has tarnished the standing of Brazil's House and this is “something of an unparallel seriousness, particularly since it does not take into consideration recent Brazilian history and the possibilities of an institutional rupture, which statements of that malicious impact can have on Brazilian public opinion”.

In the demand document there is a collection of recent statements from Rousseff in different interivews describing the impeachment process as a “coup”. Furthermore on the official May first speech on national television, the suspended president mentioned the word “coup” fifteen times, in a defense of the accusations brought against her.

Given her responsibilities as the highest official in Brazil, the president has the consitutional duty of promoting the best for the Brazilian people, and must not take advantage of her position to express doubtful, vague and imprecise statements suggesting the occurrence of a “coup”. Rousseff statements, according to the lawmakers, ”provoke an institutional crisis which aggravates the Brazilian situation and presents to the world scenario a picture of disrespect for the country's institutions.

Categories: Politics, Brazil.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • ChrisR

    What the Justice means, but is far too polite to say is STFU!

    May 19th, 2016 - 05:33 pm 0
  • Terence Hill

    “The New York Times pointed out, Dilma Rousseff is maybe the one politician who hasn’t—leading politician who hasn’t stolen in order to benefit herself. She’s being charged with manipulations in the budget, which are pretty standard in many countries, taking from one pocket and putting it into another. Maybe it’s a misdeed of some kind, but certainly doesn’t justify impeachment. In fact, she’s—we have the one leading politician who hasn’t stolen to enrich herself, who’s being impeached by a gang of thieves, who have done so. That does count as a kind of soft coup. I think that’s correct.” NOAM CHOMSKY http://www.democracynow.org/2016/5/17/noam_chomsky_brazils_president_dilma_rousseff

    May 19th, 2016 - 09:40 pm 0
  • Skip

    “which are pretty standard in many countries”

    Oh that must make it right.

    Pathetic!

    May 19th, 2016 - 09:44 pm 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!