MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, November 18th 2018 - 01:45 UTC

UK tremor: North Yorkshire approve fracking operations

Wednesday, May 25th 2016 - 07:02 UTC
Full article 1 comment
 The vote triggered a fierce response from environmentalists who see fracking as a threat to local countryside and a deviation from UK climate-change promises. The vote triggered a fierce response from environmentalists who see fracking as a threat to local countryside and a deviation from UK climate-change promises.
Councilors granted permission to UK firm Third Energy to use hydraulic fracturing, fracking, at an existing drilling site near the Kirby Misperton village Councilors granted permission to UK firm Third Energy to use hydraulic fracturing, fracking, at an existing drilling site near the Kirby Misperton village
In 2011, tests on the Fylde coast in Lancashire indicated fracking, could induce earth tremors.  In 2011, tests on the Fylde coast in Lancashire indicated fracking, could induce earth tremors.

The first fracking operation in the UK since 2011 earthquake scares has been approved by North Yorkshire councilors, stirring a fresh debate on the benefits and risks of the controversial gas extraction method. Councilors granted permission to UK firm Third Energy to use hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, at an existing drilling site near the village of Kirby Misperton.

 The seven to four vote elicited a fierce response from environmental campaigners, who see fracking not only as a threat to local countryside but as a deviation from the UK’s climate change promises as well.

“This isn't over and people will continue to raise their very valid concerns and keep fighting against fracking because it will industrialize the beautiful Yorkshire countryside and contribute to climate change,” said Daisy Sands, Greenpeace head of energy campaign.

Greenpeace together with other environmental groups including Friends of the Earth criticize the UK government for its overwhelming support of fracking, which the government claims will improve the UK’s energy security and create jobs and economic growth.

However, the IET’s energy expert Simon Harrison admitted the potential benefits of fracking are less obvious and depend on many variables.

“Shale gas obtained by fracking is more expensive than conventional gas – and in the UK its final price will be determined by the European gas market,” Harrison said. “This means that energy prices for the consumer are unlikely to fall significantly as a result of UK fracked gas.”

He also added that shale gas will only bring environmental benefits if it is used instead of more polluting coal. If it replaces only imported gas, there will be no reduction in carbon emissions as a result.

“We will not know for several years how much shale gas there is under the UK and whether it is suitable for exploitation,” he said.

In 2011, tests on the Fylde coast in Lancashire indicated fracking, which requires water to be pumped into the rock under pressure to fracture it and release the trapped gas, could induce earth tremors. Since then, two high-profile applications to frack in Lancashire have been rejected by councilors and are now the subject of appeals.

The North Yorkshire application was recommended by planners for approval despite a massive amount of objections, which the council had received ahead of the vote.

According to Vicky Perkin, a council planning officer, out of 4,420 individual representations, 4,375 were objections and just 36 were in support of the application.

North Yorkshire council's chief executive Richard Flinton said the decision was taken carefully and does not necessarily mean similar decisions will follow. “Each application of this nature will be decided upon based on its own merits,” he said.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Briton

    What a Fracking mess this is turning into.

    May 25th, 2016 - 12:21 pm 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!