MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, July 21st 2018 - 13:44 UTC

Scotland parliament rejects Brexit legislation; potential for constitutional clash with London

Wednesday, May 16th 2018 - 08:46 UTC
Full article 1 comment
Ms. May had pledged to seek a Brexit that works for all the U.K.’s nations, but Scotland, which voted to remain in the EU, is accusing her of a power grab. Ms. May had pledged to seek a Brexit that works for all the U.K.’s nations, but Scotland, which voted to remain in the EU, is accusing her of a power grab.
A historic moment for the Scottish Parliament and ”I hope that the UK government will respect the views of this parliament,” Bruce Crawford said A historic moment for the Scottish Parliament and ”I hope that the UK government will respect the views of this parliament,” Bruce Crawford said

The Scottish Parliament voted against British Prime Minister Theresa May’s landmark Brexit legislation, setting up a potential constitutional crisis and further complicating the path to an orderly departure. Lawmakers in Edinburgh voted 93-30 to withhold consent for the EU withdrawal bill. The U.K. can disregard the vote, but it would be the first time London asserts its dominance over the regional parliament.

Ms. May had pledged to seek a Brexit that works for all the U.K.’s nations, but Scotland — which voted to remain in the EU in the referendum — is accusing her of a power grab.

“This is a historic and significant moment for the Scottish Parliament and I hope with all sincerity that the U.K. government will respect the views of this parliament,” Bruce Crawford, who heads the assembly’s Finance and Constitution Committee, said after the vote.

Ms. May’s legislation has already been torn apart by the House of Lords and another battle awaits her when it returns to the lower House of Commons. At the same time she’s struggling to unite her Cabinet over what kind of relationship the U.K. should maintain with Europe, while trying to head off a mutiny by some of her lawmakers.

The prime minister now has to decide whether to press ahead despite the vote or make renewed efforts for some kind of compromise. Overruling Holyrood, the Scottish Parliament, would be politically sensitive — particularly over such a historic move as Brexit — and would set a precedent in a constitutional setup that’s only 20 years old. It also risks playing into the hands of the nationalists who are trying to build a case for another independence referendum.

“It would be a big moment in terms of the relationship between Westminster and Holyrood as this has never happened before and I don’t think anyone wants to reach that point,” said Akash Paun, senior fellow at the Institute for Government in London. “But the government might ultimately feel it has no alternative.”

Scotland voted to remain in the EU after voting to stay a part of the U.K. in a referendum in 2014. First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, whose pro-independence Scottish National Party runs the semi-autonomous government in Edinburgh, vowed straight away to contest Brexit by holding another vote on breaking away from the rest of the U.K.

Public talk of defying Brexit, though, dissipated after Ms. May’s governing Conservative Party increased support in Scotland in last year’s election, even as she lost her U.K. parliamentary majority. The SNP had its wings clipped and the narrative shifted to how Scotland can keep the powers it has after Britain leaves the EU.

“The SNP has to wait and see what happens with Brexit,” said Nicola McEwen, politics professor at the Centre on Constitutional Change at Edinburgh University. “If the constitutional issue becomes about devolution and not about independence, then that helps them and not the Conservatives. It becomes about self-governance.”

Scotland is responsible for its own education, health and transport policies as well as the judicial system and some financial affairs. The U.K. ceded more autonomy as part of promises made during 2014’s independence referendum campaign.

Categories: Politics, International.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Juana

    The question is why is this piece appearing in Mercopenguin, a British government propaganda organ supposedly devoted to America, South America and the “South Atlantic”?

    May 20th, 2018 - 01:24 am -1
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!