MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, June 26th 2019 - 18:17 UTC

 

 

Brazil's Supreme Court leans in favor of LGBTQ rights

Saturday, May 25th 2019 - 08:01 UTC
Full article 9 comments
With a formal ruling yet to be made, the judicial expected outcome would deal a severe blow to President Jair Bolsonaro's historic anti-LGBTQ stance With a formal ruling yet to be made, the judicial expected outcome would deal a severe blow to President Jair Bolsonaro's historic anti-LGBTQ stance
Justice Celso de Mello stood for the need to uphold the rights of LGBTQ people. Justice Celso de Mello stood for the need to uphold the rights of LGBTQ people.

Brazil's Supreme Court Thursday hinted it would rule against discrimination based on sexuality or gender and that Congress had acted unconstitutionally by failing to include homophobia and transphobia within its anti-discrimination statutes, it was reported.

With a formal ruling yet to be made, the judicial expected outcome would deal a severe blow to President Jair Bolsonaro's historic anti-LGBTQ stance.

The Supreme Federal Court is to decide on two cases brought by an LGBTQ rights group and the Popular Socialist Party in 2012 and 2013, arguing that Congress was dragging its feet on criminalizing discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. The court considered the cases over four days in February, when four justices — short of a majority — said such behavior should be criminalized.

But when deliberation resumed Thursday, two more justices concurred, thus creating a majority, which would outnumber whatever the other five justices vote on June 5.

On Wednesday, the Senate’s Commission on Constitution Justice and Citizenship also voted in favor of a bill to criminalize homophobia and transphobia. It asked the high court to suspend its decision while the bill makes its way through the lower house, but the court voted 9 to 2 to continue.

The first justice to announce his decision in February, Celso de Mello, criticized the “inertia” of Congress in allowing these types of offenses to go unpunished and spoke at length about the need to uphold the rights of LGBTQ people.

“There is nothing more illegitimate than drafting a constitution without the will to fully carry it out and to only apply the points that are convenient for majority groups,” he said.

The Brazilian Association of Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals, Transvestites and Transsexuals and the Popular Socialist Party say the rate of violence against members of the LGBTQ community makes the situation urgent and the criminalization of hate crimes targeting LGBTQ people requires swifter action.

Despite hosting the world’s largest gay pride parade and legalizing same-sex marriage in 2013, Brazil continues to be a dangerous place to identify as LGBTQ. Just last year, 320 people were the victims of homophobic or transphobic homicides, according to watchdog group Grupo Gay de Bahia.

Paulo Roberto Iotti Vecchiatti, the attorney representing both plaintiffs in the joint legal actions, said attacks on LGBTQ people should be considered a form of racism, which Brazil’s constitution defines as any “discrimination against fundamental rights and freedoms.” He cited a 2003 Supreme Federal Court decision declaring anti-Semitism to be a form of racism, as is “any ideology that preaches the superiority/inferiority of one group over another.”

Members of the country’s evangelical Christian lobby, who are opposed to the proposed changes in legislation, argue that their religious rights would be violated if they could no longer preach against homosexuality.

Categories: Politics, Brazil.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Jack Bauer

    “.....With a formal ruling yet to be made, the judicial expected outcome would deal a severe blow to President Jair Bolsonaro's historic anti-LGBTQ stance.”

    Deal a severe blow to Jair Bolsonaro ? Seriously ? I suppose the outcome of the ruling by the STF is a high priority issue on the President's agenda, and is essential in getting the economy and the country back on track....just as important as the reform of the Pension system ......gimme a break !!!

    May 25th, 2019 - 09:30 pm 0
  • DemonTree

    It shouldn't be a problem to push the law through quickly, then.

    May 25th, 2019 - 11:17 pm 0
  • :o))

    @Jack Bauer

    REF: the outcome of the ruling by the STF is a high priority issue on the President's agenda

    #1: STF needs to pretend to do SOME “serious” work!
    #2: STF also loves the Lime-Light once in a while

    But the REAL Highest Priority Issue; is the “Economic Reforms [not just the pension-reforms].

    And I wonder:

    A: Can PG show if he is an Economist + a Politician?
    B: As an economist; he may ”FAIL”! And as a politician?
    C: Can The Economist cut the Stealing+Waste of Funds?
    D: Is the courting over before the honeymoon?
    http://www.chargeonline.com.br/php/charges/neylima.jpg

    May 26th, 2019 - 10:58 am 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!