Argentina demands prior approval for vessels sailing to Falklands
The Argentine government made public Tuesday a decree that requires prior approval for ships sailing between Argentina and the Falkland Islands. The approval will be needed for vessels travelling “or carrying goods directly or indirectly” between the mainland and the Islands, announced cabinet chief Anibal Fernandez during a press conference at Government House.
“We must make take these decisions in the defence of Argentina’s interests” that include sovereignty and natural resources, said Fernández. He added that Britain contrary to repeated United Nations reiterated declarations has “insisted in unilateral actions” ignoring the non innovation principle while the dispute is on.
The announcement comes amid escalating tensions with the United Kingdom as several oil companies prepare to drill exploratory wells to the north and south of the Falklands based on licences awarded by the Falklands elected government
Last week the Argentine government detained a British flag cargo vessel which was loading seamless pipes, allegedly for Egypt, since the vessel had called on the Falklands/Malvinas with no Argentine government authorization.
The decree signed by President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner states that “all vessels trying to transit between Argentine continental ports and Islands’ ports, or cross Argentine maritime spaces heading to a port in the Islands must request prior authorization from the Argentine government”.
To enforce the decree the cabinet chief office will create “a commission made up with representatives from the Ministries of Planning, Justice, Economy and Foreign Affairs, that will coordinate actions to implement the decree”.
The cabinet chief said that faced with the exploration for hydrocarbons in the Falklands/Malvinas maritime spaces, the Argentine government “has insisted in all world forums about the need to adjust to multilateralism and UN resolutions”.
“The UK has repeatedly confirmed its negative to abide by UN General Assembly resolutions which recognizes the existence of a sovereignty matter which demands negotiations. The UK has ignored the resolution not to innovate, which has been evidenced in the successive episodes of natural resources exploration”, added Fernandez.
Although the purpose of the latest decree as had been anticipated by Argentine authorities is clearly geared to discourage oil companies from exploring in Falklands waters by limiting the logistics and creating a sense of “lack of legal security”, it is consistent with the Kirchners policy towards the Falkland Islands dispute.
There are no direct maritime links between the Falklands and Argentina but foreign flagged fishing vessels did operate on both sides until Buenos Aires passed legislation, which forced fishing companies to opt, with severe sanctions for those companies that “directly or indirectly” retained business operations in the Islands.
The current decree based on the same spirit could also potentially have a great impact on the cruise business since most South Atlantic itineraries include Argentine ports, mainly Ushuaia, gateway to Antarctica and the Falklands.
If the decree is fully applied and the “special committee” turns out to be “lazy” or “particularly distracted” in extending authorizations for cruise vessels to navigate in the South Atlantic and call in the Falklands, the consequences could be serious for the whole industry.
On the other hand., when Argentina is attempting to return to voluntary money markets, and must reach an agreement with pending bond holders and the Club of Paris, (a multilateral government-to-government financial organization that helps bail out developing countries with soft loans), the political move is not particularly attractive, even when the nationalistic chord of a weak government will have a big echo domestically.








39 comments Feed
Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.
not have relevance with Republic of England .
Malvinas will be like Cuba ! Kelpers Please Change Your Minds !
There are attraction for tourists that we have and you dont. There are others that you have and we dont. Thats why the cruise vessels like both places if possible - and why both of us should be co-operating to build more tourism for both our benefit(and doing it seperate to either of our claims). Same with the oil drilling - Arg could be earning millions as the natural nearby country with an oil infrastructure supply base and workforce. Instead your isolation attitude just means all that money goes to other countries and not to you! The same if oil is ever found commercially - Argentina would be the natural base for refineries etc and billions of income - but I guess you will throw that chance away as well to another country.
I can see that it would be politically better if Argentina was on board, but Europe's largest oil terminal is actually in the Shetland Islands, along with the necessary base facilities.
Develop your own facilities. If the FIG owns the land they’re built on they can charge rent. Likewise if the FIG owns the jetties they can levy a charge for every barrel of oil that flows over them. Finally, all port and harbour operations should be dealt with by the FIG – again it’s another income flow based upon each tanker movement. In broad terms this is how it works in Shetland.
It seems to me that relying on the support of temperamental Argentines isn’t a prudent course of action.
I would suggest that the workforce to man these facilities could be brought in by connecting flights, and an upshot of this is that over time more people would settle in the Falklands.
The benefits, in terms of local population increases, infrastructure development etc. would be substantial. On the other side of the coin, some of these social changes may not be welcome by all.
I think Falklanders should make the best of this opportunity, and I wish you all the best in your endeavours.
<br />
Laugh...OMG...This che idiot believes now he's a superpower. Give me a break, you clowns have nothing. not even food to feed your people or coins..pfft.
on Pentagon Building while New York twin towers collapsing !?.. laugh..
GPS guided using C/A code GPS. Easily jammed. UK equivalent PGB uses the P code GPS, not easily jammed.
A glide bomb so it still needs to get in close. 40km is not long range, cruise missiles have a range of 1200 km.
No terminal seeker so it can't attack point targets. Unlike PGB.
Any aircraft stooging around at 30,000' trying to lob bombs at the Falklands is going to have a short and very unhappy life.
And to put it all in perspective, the first operational use of precision guided munitions by the UK was during the Falklands War, 28 years ago.
Really this ain't impressive or any sort of threat.
The German V1 Flying bomb was a better cruise missile with a longer range than anything you have got. Just a tad inaccurate.
Falkland Islanders could easily build a more sophisticated version of these in their peat sheds, so watch your back.
1776 :: Brits leave plaque to assert claim on abondoned colony
1811 :: Spaniards withdraw from colony
1816 :: Un.Proc.of S.Amr's independence from Spain
1820 :: flag of Un.Pro.S.Amr(later Argentina) raised on islands
1828 :: Argentine settlements colony founded
1831 :: US warships destroy settlements
1832 :: Argentina send a governor who killed in mutiny
1833 :: Brits return to islands again.....
GPS guided using C/A code GPS. Easily jammed. UK equivalent PGB uses the P code GPS, not easily jammed.
A glide bomb so it still needs to get in close. 40km is not long range, cruise missiles have a range of 1200 km.
No terminal seeker so it can't attack point targets. Unlike PGB.
Any aircraft stooging around at 30,000' trying to lob bombs at the Falklands is going to have a short and very unhappy life.
And to put it all in perspective, the first operational use of precision guided munitions by the UK was during the Falklands War, 28 years ago.
Really this ain't impressive or any sort of threat.
You are off the mark on all your technical description. The operational model is not a glide bomd, if you think it's jamable go ahead. What I know is that in operational tests, it hit it's marks.
Whether it lands in your living room or across the street, I am sure that you will duck for cover. and will make for long sleepless nights on Mt. Pleasant.
Nicholas, take care of your shitty country. Ben laden is coming and bringing a gift for you. LOL
Your luck is Leman brothers' luck.
Hey Kirchner, let's build it, launch it and finish this once for all!!!!
Pulqui, remember that grand project, Condor, remember that grand project, Dardo III?, when they haven't even got DARDO II into service. Argentina has had many grand Peronist projects that produced squat.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5wqV1Q9ZB0&feature=fvsr
.
Lockead Martin is not here anymore, you ignorant!!!!
.....In case you hadn't noticed, Nuclear Energy is not really that popular any more......
The ignorance of this guy never cease to amaze me!!!
Right, jorge, the whole world is not building nuclear power plants in case you hadn't noticed.
Please do continue shooting yourself in the foot.
<br />
No need to encourage him Justin!
With oil prices increasing and weather change, many countries around the world think seriously about nuclear energy, ignorant. You and your colleage archibalito are gettin stoned so fast. Ridiculous people!
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!