Thursday, May 20th 2010 - 18:34 UTC

Argentina revives long time border dispute with Chile in Patagonian ice fields

Old wounds were reopened between Chile and Argentina this week: a long-time border dispute in the nations’ southern Patagonia regions.

Senator Hernán Larraín: in some countries Chile is becoming the “scapegoat for local political problems”

The dispute is over 100 miles of contested land known as the Southern Icefields, which contain the second largest reserve of potable water in the world. The area was only one of two left with undetermined status during the demarcation of 24 disputed borders in 1990, and now remains the only contested area. Discussion regarding the land began again in 2006, when Argentina began creating maps to demarcate the icefields.

The debate’s resurgence was triggered by Argentine President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner announcement of the completion of the maps in September 2009. This prompted concerns within the Chilean government because of discrepancies between Chilean and Argentine maps.

While all signs point to trouble, members of Chile’s government have assured the public that the issue will be taken care of calmly.

There is not a conflict,” said president of the Chilean Senate Jorge Pizarro. “There is a procedure that is being carried forward and is agreed on by both countries. It is a technical process that requires time and must be addressed jointly.”

Despite these reassurances, the Chilean Senate’s External Relations Committee called a hearing Wednesday to address the issue. During the meeting, the committee assessed the information coming out of Argentina to see if there is a possible threat of an unfavourable estimate of the border. The government’s main concern is that the agreement would primarily acknowledge Argentine claims, as happened in a dispute settled by an international tribunal in 1994.

Regrettably for the Chilean government, this dispute comes on the heels of Peruvian demands for the settlement of a coastal land dispute that has been under debate since the Pacific War more than 100 years ago.

Mrs Kirchner and Peruvian President Alan García were seen discussing the matter at the recent Europe-Latin America and Caribbean Conference in Madrid. Some Chilean senators have expressed their opinions that the timing of two controversies is more than a mere coincidence.

“It seems that, in some countries, Chile has changed into a scapegoat for local political problems,” said Senator Hernán Larraín. “But we are not going to fall into that game.”
For the time being, Chilean president Sebastián Piñera has not announced his policy on the two disputes. He has simply said that the government will be working to resolve them quickly.

“We are working on these two issues in a reasonable way, with evidence based in international law and international treaties, and with the willingness to solve these problems,” Piñera told media recently.

By Lindsay Fendt – Santiago Times

 

8 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Comments should refer to article. Thank you.

1 Rhaurie-Craughwell (#) May 20th, 2010 - 07:31 pm Report abuse
And who says progress isn't dead?
2 Rufus (#) May 20th, 2010 - 08:36 pm Report abuse
So that's Brazil annoyed over trade protectionism
Chile annoyed over the Southern Ice Fields (again)
The Falkland Islands annoyed over the perpetual soverignty claims
Uruguay annoyed over trade restrictions and pickets

All they need is Paraguay for the full set of their neighbours annoyed with them.
3 agent0060 (#) May 20th, 2010 - 08:49 pm Report abuse
But they are keeping their mob interested. Trouble is, how many external problems do they need to avoid attention to the internal ones?
4 Nicholas (#) May 20th, 2010 - 08:57 pm Report abuse
let the che idiots destroy them self by lying to the people who keep on voting for the same idiots, with protectionism and whining about old subjects, 100 pure propaganda to distract their own people from the real issues, their economy that soon will crash “again”.
5 jorge! (#) May 21st, 2010 - 04:20 pm Report abuse
Stop inventing conflicts where there is none!!!!!!!!!!!

That's what you wish damm pirates!!!!

Nicholas, you are always so idiot, aren't you!!!!
6 globetrotter (#) May 21st, 2010 - 04:29 pm Report abuse
4. Nicholas! what do you vote for in this country? idiots or IDIOTS??? As south America's most argumentative bunch of people, there never will be peace because, there is always a bone of contention, and there is always something to bicker about. The Malvinas issue doesnt create the desired effect among the population (internatuional community) so, Chile is now on the agenda...if not Chile, then Uruguay etc....The best we can hope for is, good ridance to the IDIOTS we have in power at the momnet.
7 Bubba (#) May 23rd, 2010 - 11:33 am Report abuse
Rufus, you forgot Bolivia...
8 Idlehands (#) May 25th, 2010 - 09:05 am Report abuse
”The Malvinas issue doesnt create the desired effect among the population (internatuional community) ”

That's true. Very few of the Falklands stories are even published in the UK. Idoubt the rest of the world is even aware of them. I have to come to Mercopress to read about them where it seems to be the hottest story in town.

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!

Advertisement

Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!

Advertisement