Argentine government accuses Clarín and La Nación of conspiring with military regimes
The Argentine government moved Tuesday to take over the country’s only newsprint maker, alleging two leading newspapers illegally conspired with military dictators to control the company three decades ago and then used it to drive competing media out of business.
President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner said the courts should decide whether the Grupo Clarin and La Nacion media companies should be charged with crimes against humanity, specifically whether the newsprint company was illegally expropriated by the newspapers and the military junta.
The companies, with which Mrs. Kirchner has been feuding for two years, deny any illegality in the acquisition of the newsprint maker, or other crimes. They accuse the government of trying to control the essential newsprint needed to guarantee freedom of expression, a position supported by the Inter-American Press Association and other media groups.
Speaking in a national broadcast from Government House, Mrs Kirchner said she was defending “true freedom of expression” and the interests of the minority shareholder, “not the state but the Argentine people”. She accused Grupo Clarin and La Nacion of using the newsprint company, Papel Prensa SA, to impose media monopolies on Argentina, stifling other viewpoints by refusing to sell paper at fair prices to competitors.
She showed a headline from the opposition Clarin newspaper saying Who controls Papel Prensa controls the written word, and said she couldn't agree more.
Papel Prensa is the only company that produces newsprint in this country Mrs. Kirchner said, and it's a vertically integrated monopoly. It determines who it sells to, how much it sells and at what price. And so yes, whoever controls it controls the written word in the Republic of Argentina.
Mrs. Kirchner presented the conclusions of a government investigation of Papel Prensa's history and economic activities — some 23,000 pages in all, stacked in large piles on a table beside her podium — and said her human rights secretary would send it to the justice system for consideration of rights charges against owners of the two media companies.
She further said she would propose legislation declaring newsprint supply to be a matter of national interest, subject to government and Congressional regulation that guarantees equal and fair distribution to all of Argentina's newspapers. Papel Prensa sells newsprint to more than 130 clients across the country. And she said the Executive branch would invest to develop enough newsprint domestically to supply all the country's needs. This product should not be imported, she said.
Mrs Kirchner said the newspapers obtained Papel Prensa through a forced sale in 1976 at a time when the military junta was doing all it could to destroy the company's owner, David Graiver, a prominent banker who was secretly supporting the leftist Montonero guerrillas at the time. Graiver died in a suspicious plane crash, sending his company into bankruptcy and leaving his widow, Lidia Papaleo, and parents to face the dictators.
”And five days after she signed (the papers selling the company), she was detained. And during her detention, she was raped, tortured, beaten in the head. The same luck was suffered by her in-laws and other members of their company, the president said. They had been forced to sell — and their detention was delayed so that the buyers could claim they obtained the company in good faith.
The owners of La Nacion and Clarin denied participating in any crime against humanity, saying that Papaleo freely sold the company to emerge from bankruptcy before beginning her long jail term and that she never formally alleged any forced sale or fraud after Argentina recovered its democracy.
Never, in 27 years of democracy, has Papel Prensa faced an administrative or judicial question about its origin, they said in a joint statement earlier Tuesday.
After President Cristina Kirchner's broadcast, Clarin ran a headline quoting an opposition lawmaker as saying Today the government crossed the line between democracy and authoritarianism. A headline in La Nacion declared: The President wants an official press.”








26 comments Feed
Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.
Of course not ... she'd lose control again if that was the case :-)
Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rage at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
Because their words had forked no lightning they
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
And you, my father, there on the sad height,
Curse, bless me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Dylan Thomas
It s useful to dig in history in order to be more careful when being critical of other countries. Not a frequent exercise by the anglo writers in this site.
Should be this the real aim why you in USA are been tought so scarcely of other´s history?
BTW, I´m not kirchnerist but use to talk about that only with argentinos.
I will tell you though I spent 4 years studying US and Argentinian history so I am pretty well versed in those areas. It is one of reasons I write on these boards, because I find it fascinating comparing the different paths 2 countries took and their outcomes. The most important thing I learned living in Argentina is how great and special the USA really is!
Not the same opinion about its impact worldwide, as South America can testify.
I guess that is why we have 250000 illgal Argentinians living in Miami alone.
I guess why we have 7000 legal (because we continue being a generous and open country for inmigration) citizens of US coming to live here during last year. Doesn´t match with the description of Argentina that I can find here.
I lived there for 5 years until I couldn't stand it any longer, it's really too bad because I liked it at first but the crime, noise, filth and corruption drove me back to the USA.
www.lanacion.com.ar/nota.asp?nota_id=1296839
Seems that the yanks interviewed don´t match neither in the categories you mention nor with your taste.
Perhaps I could share many of your views about the virtues of US, including today. The pitty is that you neglect any virtue to others or mistakes to yours and, you know, with people close-minded is very difficult to have a dialogue.
Be happy with your stereotypes!
The guy is a nut job.
Is that a trifle inconveient for you margo?
A crown colony was one which was taken through force or war. Settled nations such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Newfoundland were called dominions.
Most overseas territories are simply people who don't want independance.
You can't do anything.
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!