Wednesday, September 15th 2010 - 05:46 UTC

Argentina confirms drilling in Malvinas basin for next December

The Argentine press confirmed that following the contracting of a semi-submersible rig from the Swedish company Stensa, a consortium of Argentine based oil companies will begin exploratory drilling in the Malvinas basin next December.

Defence minister Nilda Garré: a policy to stop the “encroaching” British oil companies

The consortium which includes YPF-Repsol, Pan American Energy and Petrobras will be drilling half way between the Falkland Islands and Tierra del Fuego, in what is considered the most austral hydrocarbons offshore exploratory operation in Argentine history.

The initiative is seen as a strong reply from Argentina to the exploratory round in Falklands’ waters which the government of President Cristina Kirchner has condemned and rejected as “illegal” since these are “disputed waters”, according to the Argentine argument.

At least five London quoted companies have drilled or have announced plans to drill in Falklands’ waters taking advantage of the “Ocean Guardian” rig.

In Buenos Aires Defence ministry strategy considers the southwest Atlantic as “the soft belly of Argentina” and the policy has been to sponsor oil related activities in the area to contain the “encroaching” British companies, according to Argentina’s Cronista Comercial, a financial newspaper close to the government.

“A positive result in the area would give a boost to the industry, and investments, and also most importantly signal defence of our sovereignty”, said an Argentine Defence ministry source.

The consortium involved in the coming drilling round is estimated to pour into the operation 140 million US dollars. A 3D survey of the area to be explored was recently finished and analyzed.

Apparently the project was almost cancelled at the end of last year, but YPF was finally able to contract a semi-submersible rig which has the necessary fittings to stand weather conditions in the South Atlantic. Built to stand ten metre waves the rig is permanently fixed to its position by a GPS system and four independent turbines. The vessel will be operating in waters 1.500 metres deep and drilling is expected to exceed 3.000 metres.

Spain’s Repsol-YPF has sold some of its YPF assets back to Argentine interests, particularly the Eskenazi family which is very close to the Kirchner couple and had promised to go ahead with the Malvinas basin project.
 

17 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.

1 Harrier (#) Sep 15th, 2010 - 10:32 am Report abuse
Isn't it strange that when the Falkland Islands engage in hydrocarbons exploration it is condemned, by Argentina, as “unilateral and illegal” with possible environmental consequences, but when Argentina does it, it's OK?
2 Islander1 (#) Sep 15th, 2010 - 11:25 am Report abuse
It will be very interesting to see how they do the pre-drilling permission Environmental Impact and Spill Risk Assessment - or don,t they bother with such things?
Its their zone area - but the Islands directly down wind and current -perhaps the idea is for a big spill - to wipe us off?
So long as they do carry out proper predrill assessments - then I wish them good drilling.
3 Beef (#) Sep 15th, 2010 - 11:29 am Report abuse
Best of luck with the drilling, although how drilling in Argentine waters is supposed to prevent “encroachment” by those companies operating in FI waters is a bit odd. The drilling happens in licences blocks and all ofthe blocks licences by the FIG are nowhere near the internationally recognized demarcation zone between FI and Argentine waters!

Even a five year old could spot that idiotic comment.

As the sands in these areas come from different ancient river basins then it is no as if either side could side track by the odd “100 miles” although this may another claim dreamt up in BA (even though this would defy the laws of physics and material science)!
4 Zethee (#) Sep 15th, 2010 - 03:48 pm Report abuse
They might stop moaning so much if they find some oil.

Goodluck with it.
5 Beef (#) Sep 15th, 2010 - 05:02 pm Report abuse
They are yapping to the G77 about the environmental impact that drilling in the FI could have yet they are to start drilling in their own nearby waters.

Honestly this bunch become more of a laughing stock everyday.
6 stick up your junta (#) Sep 15th, 2010 - 06:35 pm Report abuse
Curiouser and curiouser
This Alice in Wonderland country called Argentina
7 Beef (#) Sep 15th, 2010 - 09:47 pm Report abuse
You mean Alice in Wonderland was not based on a true story :-(
8 Zethee (#) Sep 15th, 2010 - 11:35 pm Report abuse
Neither is most of what Argentina claims.
9 JoseAngeldeMonterrey (#) Sep 16th, 2010 - 12:46 am Report abuse
Seems to me that we have a case here where the one with the longest drinking straw will drink the other´s milkshake.
10 stick up your junta (#) Sep 16th, 2010 - 06:16 am Report abuse
We will put a knot in the Argie straw
11 Cadfael (#) Sep 16th, 2010 - 08:21 am Report abuse
Did anyone else read Gordon Dickinson's “Dragon under the Sea”?
A sci-fi novel about oil, submarines and piracy, there was the potential for this in the North Sea but now more likely in the Carribean/GOM
Unlikely to happen in the South Atlantic, argies dont have the balls!
12 Ale (#) Sep 17th, 2010 - 03:38 am Report abuse
It is not matter of balls or straws, is more important if it is commercially viable to have this oil drilling and future production 8000 miles from UK or 300 from mainland Argentina.
Jose, I watched that movie, a good one!(“There will Be Blood”)
13 Zethee (#) Sep 17th, 2010 - 11:31 am Report abuse
When they decided to spend millions to start oil industry around the falklands islands this is the main issue that would have been thought out.

They wouldn't be there if it wasn't commercially viable..they are businesses.
14 Cadfael (#) Sep 19th, 2010 - 08:53 am Report abuse
The sooner there is a UK/Chile agreement the better, as argentina has clearly demonstrated the lack of desire (now there's a word in the news!) to share anything with the UK or the Falklanders.
15 PomInOz (#) Sep 19th, 2010 - 04:47 pm Report abuse
Struggling to work out how this thread is involved witht the Falklands, but, this is in the “most-commented-upon-thread” and therefore I'd like to have my say...So, why are the Argentines so quiet?!...
16 Rhaurie-Craughwell (#) Sep 19th, 2010 - 07:57 pm Report abuse
I thought Argentina's current argument in the latest round of the traditional C-24 was that they should get sovereignty because drilling was an environmental catastrophe waiting to happen?
17 Typhoon (#) Sep 20th, 2010 - 04:25 pm Report abuse
I'm waiting to see what happens when some innocent cargo ship, fleeing from pirates (later found to be Argentine rowboats), collides with one of these Argentine rigs. Could be messy!!

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!

Advertisement

Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!