MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, November 19th 2024 - 03:32 UTC

 

 

Palestinians condemn US plan to Settle Refugees in South America

Wednesday, January 26th 2011 - 17:27 UTC
Full article 5 comments
Condoleezza Rice suggested sending refugees to Chile and Argentina. Condoleezza Rice suggested sending refugees to Chile and Argentina.

Suggestion revealed in Palestine papers clashes with refugees' fundamental right to go home, say Palestinian groups according to The Guardian newspaper.

Palestinians have expressed shock and dismay at the US suggestion to settle Palestinian refugees in Argentina and Chile rather than let them return to ancestral land in Israel.

Representatives of the Palestinian diaspora said the plan to ship displaced Palestinians from the Middle East to a new homeland across the Atlantic clashed with their fundamental right to go home.

“It's completely unacceptable. It contradicts our inalienable right to return to our own homeland,” said Daniel Jadue, vice-president of Chile's Palestine Federation. “That right cannot be renounced. To make this suggestion shows the mediation was not honest. It was clearly tilted in favour of Israel. This is extremely grave.”

Condoleezza Rice,http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/condoleezza-rice who was secretary of state in the Bush administration, floated the idea at a meeting on 28 June 2008 with US, Israeli and Palestinian negotiators in Berlin, according to minutes of the meeting obtained by al-Jazeera and shared with the,Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/24/condoleezza-rice-palestinian-refugees-south-america .

The suggestion dumbfounded South America's Palestinians – a largely Christian community which emigrated in waves over the past century and settled across the region, especially in Chile which is said to be home to more than 200,000.

Chile's Palestinians would welcome compatriots who chose to settle in the Andes, said Jadue. “If a Palestinian accepted to come here that would be their right and we would show solidarity.” But that did not justify a US proposal to funnel refugees from the Middle East to reduce pressure on Israel to give up land, he said. “That's wrong.”

Tilda Rabi, president of the Federation of Palestinian Organisations in Argentina, said the proposal violated the UN's affirmation of refugees' right to return home. “This is an extension of a long campaign of ethnic cleansing, of clearing people from their own homelands.” She doubted many refugees would have accepted such an offer. “In the camps people still have keys to the homes they left behind.”

It is unclear whether the Bush administration lobbied Argentina and Chile to take Palestinians.

The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) said it received no such request. “UNRWA has never been approached by any government to assist with the movement of refugees to South America,” said a spokesman, Chris Gunness. “If such an offer was made refugees could accept or reject it,” he said. “It would be their choice.”

Hillary Clinton, Rice's successor as secretary of state, played down the importance of the documents in her first comments on the leak last night.

“I don't think it comes as any surprise what the issues are between the Palestinians and the Israelis,” she told reporters in Mexico. “They have been well known for 20 years or more. They are difficult issues. They do not lend themselves easily to compromise.”

However, the state department spokesman Philip Crowley earlier acknowledged that the disclosure would have an impact on efforts to get peace talks restarted.

“We don't deny that this release will, at least for a time, make the situation more difficult than it already was,” he said. “None of this changes our understanding of what is at stake, or what needs to be done. We continue to believe a framework agreement is both possible and necessary. We continue to work with and engage the parties.”

The United Nations special co-ordinator for the Middle East peace process, Robert Serry, said some of the interpretation of the documents conveyed an “inaccurate impression”. The Palestinian negotiators were committed to reaching a deal in the interests of the Palestinian people, he said.

“At this crucial time, I would urge both parties to show their readiness for a negotiated peace based on a two-state solution, and to deliver on the ground. It is to the genuine credit of the Palestinian leadership that they are doing so.”

Israel radio reported that Nabil Shaath, a member of the Palestinian negotiating team, said the documents released by al-Jazeera were authentic, unofficial and did not obligate the Palestinian side.

 

Categories: Politics, Latin America.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Think

    We have had such a myth before...........
    http://www.patagonjournal.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1497%3Aplan-andinia&catid=78%3Amedioambiente&Itemid=268&lang=en

    But.........
    If it should ever become true........
    Argentina could be generous and give them the Falklands!

    Jan 26th, 2011 - 05:48 pm 0
  • xbarilox

    Not a mmyth, but a plan, and a good one. But Palestinians tell the truth when they say :“It's completely unacceptable. It contradicts our inalienable right to return to our own homeland,” said Daniel Jadue, vice-president of Chile's Palestine Federation. “That right cannot be renounced. To make this suggestion shows the mediation was not honest. It was clearly tilted in favour of Israel. This is extremely grave.”Patagonia is a good place for refugees, but I'd love to see muslims too not only christians. La Señora Arroz haciendo de las suyas :)

    Jan 26th, 2011 - 06:01 pm 0
  • Gabi

    I wonder if the Palestinians living in USA are interested to return to the Gaza Strip. Will the Palestians also having the same arguments if they propose to them to relocate in the USA???

    Jan 26th, 2011 - 07:31 pm 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!