Thursday, September 29th 2011 - 00:12 UTC

US will vote against loans to Argentina in World Bank and IDB

The US State Department said on Wednesday that Argentina must normalize relations with creditors. The statement follows an announcement last week from the Treasury Department warning that the US will vote against granting loans to Argentina in multilateral organizations.

US Treasury official Lago said countries must honour international obligations

“As a government we have encouraged Argentina to settle its pending issues” in the international disputes centre from the World Bank (ICSID, International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes) so as “to take the necessary measures to normalize totally and definitively its relations with creditors”, said State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland.

Given Argentina’s attitude contrary “to honour debts with creditors and to work with international institutions”, United States will vote against extending World Bank and Inter American Development Bank credits to that country, announced last week a high official from the Treasury Department during a congressional hearing.

Likewise Jose W. Fernandez, State Department Assistant Secretary for Economic, Energy and Business did not discard further initiatives from Washington against Argentina if the country does not comply with its international commitments.

“US diplomacy will take into account international fulfilments when discussing new cooperation or assistance programs”, said Fernandez.

Argentina cancelled most of its pending debt with foreign investors since the 2001 default, but still has arrears totalling 6.1 billion dollars.

US members of Congress and creditors have requested the administration of President Barack Obama to put more pressure so that Argentina complies with all pending debts.

”We consider the stance of Argentina particularly concerning since the country’s per capita income belongs to the group of mid-income countries”, said before the US Congress Marisa Lago Assistant Deputy Treasury Secretary for international markets.

Ms Lago revealed that last September 14, the US with its 30% stock in the Inter American Development Bank voted against granting Argentina a 230 million dollars loan.

Nevertheless the loan was approved but the vote “sends a clear message that the US is concerned with Argentina’s attitude”.

Lago anticipated the US “will continue to vote negatively, and will discuss with other creditors that share our concern and want to send the message that we sustain ICSID rulings and countries must honour their international obligations”.

Fernandez revealed that the State and Treasury departments feel particularly frustrated with Argentine refusal to comply with the ICSID. Two US companies Azurix and Blueridge have favourable rulings involving several hundreds of millions of dollars “but have yet to be paid”.

Houston based Azurix Corp., which specializes in water services and investment received a 30-year concession from Argentina in 1999 and is owed 235 million, including interest, for breach-of-contract, according to its president, Rod Castillo.

Together with members of Congress they are demanding that the US Trade Office cancels all trade benefits awarded to Argentina under the General Preferences System.

While the US alone can’t prevent the Washington-based institutions from making the loans, the move is the strongest to date against President Cristina Fernandez, who polls show will win a second, four- year term in elections next month.

It also responds to concerns of some US lawmakers as Treasury asks Congress for 3.4 billion dollars in foreign aid next year, including 357 million dollars in additional capital for development banks.

“This is a very strong signal on the part of the US that they are very unhappy with Argentina,” said Claudio Loser, an Argentine economist who oversaw Latin America at the IMF from 1994 to 2002. It “will be seen positively in Congress.”

Argentina, which has been locked out of international debt markets since its record 2001 default is counting on about 15 billion pesos (3.6 billion dollars) of loans from international lenders in its draft 2012 budget, being taken up by Congress this week.

The IDB granted Argentina 1.2 billion of loans last year. That compares with 2.2 billion in the fiscal year ended June 30 from the World Bank.

Loans pending approval at the IDB this year include 300 million to improve road infrastructure in the north of the country and 250 million for water and sanitation in the Buenos Aires metropolitan area.

Argentine Finance Secretary Hernan Lorenzino has said holders of 4 billion dollars in defaulted debt are “vulture funds” pursuing litigation against the country, which he said has made a good-faith effort to address the default in two restructurings.

The U.S. might find allies in other Paris club members that are losing patience with Argentina, said Loser, who estimates Argentina can’t afford to lose the funding. Paris Club nations include Germany and Japan.

Guillermo Nielsen, a former Argentine finance secretary who oversaw the country’s defaulted debt restructuring in 2005, said other Group of Seven countries might follow the US lead.

“This is neither pleasant, nor constructive,” Nielsen, now a consultant, said in an interview yesterday. “It will need to be resolved, it’s not something that goes unnoticed or that you can remain indifferent to.”
 

16 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.

1 xbarilox (#) Sep 29th, 2011 - 12:24 am Report abuse
well, finally, something good coming from the “land of the free” “el modelo” de choreo estatizado va a tener un final terrible, peor que 2001. Cheers kirchnerists!!!
2 Troneas (#) Sep 29th, 2011 - 12:26 am Report abuse
“honour international obligations and work with international institutions”

this coming from the United States, which for the past decade has ignored international law and international institutions to commit torture, assassinations, hamper fair justice to individuals...

since Clinton, these people have lost their way. Instead of tolerance and cooperation to solve world problems they insist on punishing others as a means to solve problems. no wonder why they are as isolated as ever. which country but the UK stand these people?
3 xbarilox (#) Sep 29th, 2011 - 12:40 am Report abuse
no more money to spend on people who don't work, troneas, fun is coming to an end and poor will eat cristina's liver, i want to take a photo of that :)
4 Troneas (#) Sep 29th, 2011 - 12:48 am Report abuse
@3 this money is destined to infrastructure projects as it says above. infrastructure projects creates jobs.

as for spending money on people who do not work - you seem to assume that the majority of people don't work because they don't want to. i tend to think they don't work because in todays world its becoming harder and harder to find a job; so the government assists them in that way. as long as there is money for that purpose, why not? one day the person who enjoys this benefit might be employed and i won't. its called distribution of resources so that people can have a dignified life. its not perfect but its better than leaving them on their own to starve, robbing, killing and what not.

look at the news today about the protests in wall street. or the civil war in the uk a month or so ago... there is nothing wrong with contributing to the welfare of your country if you have the means.
5 ElaineB (#) Sep 29th, 2011 - 09:35 am Report abuse
There was a CIVIL WAR in the UK a month ago? I must have missed it whilst going about my peaceful business. My neighbours are still friendly, so we must be on the same side in this 'war'. (Maybe you meant civil unrest which is quite a different matter).

The point is that Argentina has always behaved like a belligerent, under-sized teenager in the playground when it come to facing responsibilities. All mouth and no trousers. Adults tolerate it for so long but when the teenager refuses to grow up it is time for consequences.

You can only poke your tongue out at the big boys for so long before their patience runs out. I think we are seeing this now. Argentina does not have the fiancial muscle to back up their threats and refusal to meet with their obligations.

You can draw parallels with the Tevez incident. He gets a bit of money and success and lets it inflate his ego to the point where he thinks he can tell his boss when he plays football; refusing to act responsibly and do what he is paid to do. Man City have put up with his antics for too long and finally they have run out of patience. It is highly likely he will not play football in The Premiership again. A case of biting off the hand that fed him a banquet.
6 geo (#) Sep 29th, 2011 - 10:38 am Report abuse
weell done US !!

already Argentina doesn't need any external loans .....
BUT
USA has 4 billions US $ loans...4 billions US $ equity investment
from Argentina......

but if US does this step to get more debts from Argentina....
then i have no any idea on it ...!!
7 Rufus (#) Sep 29th, 2011 - 01:04 pm Report abuse
@5 Elaine

The extent of the “civil war” in the 150k+ people city where I live was someone setting light to two bins, a skip and a McDonalds.

I'm still trying to work out if it was rioters or the paramilitary division of the Environmental Health people...
8 ElaineB (#) Sep 29th, 2011 - 01:40 pm Report abuse
@7 LOL!
9 yankeeboy (#) Sep 29th, 2011 - 01:56 pm Report abuse
You know the media likes conflict and loves progressives so they blow it all out of proportion with tight camera angles etc.

There are about 100 people sleeping in a park near Wall Street, not what I would call a big event. As it gets colder and rainier I am sure they will go back to momma's house or some gov't provided shelter to get warm and dry.
10 atk357 (#) Sep 29th, 2011 - 06:25 pm Report abuse
For better or for worse, this is the kind of politics that I never like from my country (USA). It is not a matter of “paying” the bill, I think it is a matter of preventing “growth”. It is obvious that our govenment does not like CFK's attitude, however if she decides (hypothetical of course) to buy F-18s or F-16s....I don't think that would be a problem.
11 O gara (#) Sep 29th, 2011 - 08:51 pm Report abuse
Yankeeboy i would say any loans you guys deal with soon will have to be sancioned by Beijing.Now if Wen Jiabao was to say something like that well then CFK would have to start negotiating with the Paris club.In the meantime and i would say that will be quite a while it might be better for Obamas administration to study CFK and how she runs a country which can grow
12 yankeeboy (#) Sep 29th, 2011 - 10:15 pm Report abuse
What a ridiculous statement, it makes no sense at all. China has a very small ownership in WB, IDB and they are not part of the Paris Club so I am not sure what you are talking about.
I know you don't want to hear it but the USA is still militarily and economically the most powerful country in the world and that is not going to change in any of our lifetimes.
Argentina will always be poor and inconsequential and more like Bolivia than UK in 5 years.
13 HaveToCorrectThisRetard (#) Sep 30th, 2011 - 02:29 am Report abuse
actually, FACTUALLY china is the biggest economic power in the world, @ yankeeboy, as of this year, China now has larger dollar amount of global trade than USA
militarily though, yes USA is still the most powerful, but China has some weapons that could almost completely disable the US military, and anyway, neither china nor USA want to/nor can afford to go to war with eachother, MILLIONS of ppl would die on both sides
14 yankeeboy (#) Sep 30th, 2011 - 02:17 pm Report abuse
#13 i am not sure where you get yoru “facts” and I think you reading comprehension is probably a little low so here is a chart for you:
www.knowliz.com/2010/05/the-us-vs-china-head-to-head-economy-comparison.html
There is not one stat where China exceeds the USA in a positive way. They are basically still a developing country and their population will get old before they ever get rich. Also it doesn't help that they have killed most of the girl babies for the last 40 yrs. Kinda makes it hard to reproduce.
I predict with a slowing economy they are going to have widespread protests that will be hard for the gov't to control. They currently have 1000s a day and it will only get worse as the economy slows. They don't have enough mfg jobs to keep $ in people's pockets. They are also sitting on a huge property bubble that is ready to burst and is much worse than the USA's was.
Be careful of using trend lines because they break really easily.
15 HaveToCorrectThisRetard (#) Sep 30th, 2011 - 03:12 pm Report abuse
lol, noob, factually China controls a larger portion of global trade as of this year, than USA
16 mastershakejb (#) Sep 30th, 2011 - 03:15 pm Report abuse
you predict a lot of stuff yankeeboy........and guess what? no one cares about your sophmoric noob predictions, lol every amerifag thinks he's an economist all the sudden as of 2008

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!

Advertisement

Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!

Advertisement