Most Bolivians who voted in Sunday's election to choose the country's top judges cast invalid ballots in what would be a stinging rebuke for President Evo Morales, according to unofficial partial results.
If the results hold, it would the first defeat at the polls for the leftist coca-grower's union leader of his nearly six-year presidency. Official results were not expected for at least five days in the vote for 56 judgeships on Bolivia's top four tribunals, including its supreme and constitutional courts.
But an unofficial count by the Ipsos, Opinion y Mercado polling firm found 61% of voters cast ballots that were either null or blank. It said its count was based on 75% of the vote.
Sober-looking Morales declared himself very pleased with the public's participation in brief words to the news media. He asserted that those who called the boycott have failed.
Opposition leaders had called on voters to cast invalid ballots to protest what they considered a power grab. They contended that the election would erode the independence of the judiciary and strengthen Morales because the 114 candidates were chosen by a Congress dominated by his governing MAS movement.
A leading opposition politician, Samuel Doria Medina, said the results proved the election was illegitimate. He called for starting the judicial selection process from scratch.
Under electoral rules, only a majority of valid votes are needed to fill each judicial post.
Prior to a new constitution championed by Morales and approved by voters, the legislature chose judges for the top courts.
The opposition accuses Morales of using the judiciary to persecute adversaries. Several opposition leaders are in exile after being accused of sedition. Morales comfortably won re-election in December 2009 but his popularity has plummeted in the past year over policy decisions that angered many Bolivians.
First, Morales declared just after Christmas that he was ending subsidies on gasoline; he reversed himself after major protests. Then he insisted on a highway through a lowlands indigenous preserve, and drew further public outrage when police last month attacked Indians marching against it. Morales has indicated he wants to run for a third term in 2014
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesCrumbs for the opposition .let's look for what we can take from the elite to satisfy a few of the professionals and spend some more on education so that so many spoilt paper don't happen in future democratic elections.or since the opposition don't like one they can't win,ban them (elections that is).
Oct 17th, 2011 - 09:39 am 0Perhaps you would like to ban oppositions all together.
Oct 17th, 2011 - 11:12 am 0It would seem that there are still, in the nation, individuals who value an unpoliticised judiciary.
It's good to see that there are still ethical people in this part of the world.
Banning elections and oppositions is the habit of sectors that like things the way they see them,ethical people you appear to call them.why advocate spoiling voting papers seen as voting is meant to be a positive act to express a preference in a limited field of options. Isn't spoiling papers a destructive and dissenting action.
Oct 20th, 2011 - 08:22 pm 0Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!