Wednesday, December 14th 2011 - 18:05 UTC

China questions safety of Brazil’s dry bulk carriers, the world’s largest

China should be in no rush to allow Brazil’s new Valemax ships, the world's largest dry bulk carriers, into its ports, as they have not been thoroughly tested and any oil leak from one could be catastrophic, an influential Chinese industry group warned on Tuesday.

Vale Beijing on her maiden trip and fully loaded suffered cracks in the hull and a leak in a ballast tank

Chinese ship owners want Beijing to keep the new mega vessels (VLOCs) out, fearing Vale, the world's biggest iron ore miner, will use them to monopolise the dry bulk shipping market at their expense.

China is the main market for Vale, a Brazilian mining giant.

The China Ship owners' Association (CSA) said the 400.000-tonne Valemaxes could pose a safety threat. A week ago, the Vale Beijing was found to have a leak as it was preparing for its maiden voyage.

“Such mega ships have been newly built ... and it is not yet certain whether they can withstand various sea conditions” the CSA said. “If there is any leaking of fuel oil, the pollution will be catastrophic.”

The CSA wields significant industry clout because its members control some 80% of China's shipping capacity, and many are state-owned companies.

The Vale Beijing is one of the first of almost three dozen huge bulk carriers commissioned by Vale, which sees the bigger vessels reducing its costs so it can compete better with Australian rivals BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto which are closer to the Chinese market.

Huang said he did not expect Vale's VLOCs to be calling at Chinese ports any time soon. “A few Chinese ports may be able to accommodate those ships in terms of designed capacity, but this is not tested yet, and there's a lack of data to prove it is feasible.”

Meantime the damaged Vale Beijing has been towed to an anchorage for repairs, according to STX Pan Ocean, which operates the 400,000 dwt iron-ore carrier.

South Korea-based STX has not explained the cause of the damage, although it confirmed that Vale Beijing had a cracked hull and a leak in a ballast tank.

The huge vessel, one of five currently in operation, was on its maiden voyage when it berthed in Ponta da Madeira port outside the city of Sao Luis. It had almost 380,000 tons of iron ore in its hold when it began taking on water earlier in the week.

The port is operated by mining giant Vale, which has a 25-year contract worth 6.2bn dollars with STX to ship iron ore.

Vale said the interruption at the port stopped it from loading 750.000 tons of ore. Port operations have now resumed. Ponta da Madeira port exports about a third of Vale’s annual output.

A crack in Vale Beijing’s ballast tanks was either the result of loading its holds or a structural problem, an official with the Sao Luis harbour pilots’ service revealed. There are no facilities to unload iron ore at Ponta da Madeira and no large shipyards in the area. Repairs must be made by divers while the ship is at anchor, the harbour pilots’ office said.

Vale Beijing was built at STX Offshore and Shipbuilding in Jinhae, South Korea, and inspected by Norwegian classification society Det Norske Veritas. It is registered in the Marshall Islands.

6 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.

1 briton (#) Dec 14th, 2011 - 06:41 pm Report abuse
free trade
2 Pirat-Hunter (#) Dec 14th, 2011 - 10:53 pm Report abuse
ic CIA planning an attck on Chinese ships ?? years ago something like this was said by a US politician and soon enought the Germans sunk a US ships with thousands on board, nothing like this is being said about british ships going to theft oil from Islas Malvinas and we all know the track record BP has with ocean wells.
3 briton (#) Dec 15th, 2011 - 12:54 am Report abuse
confusion old boy,
thats the statagy, confusion .
4 Rob the argentine (#) Dec 15th, 2011 - 04:13 pm Report abuse
#2 how is involved the Falkalnd issue with this article? can you tell me because maybe I am retarded and don't understand that Falklands DO NOT belong to Argentina. (an argentine living in Mendoza, Argentina)
5 GeoffWard2 (#) Dec 15th, 2011 - 09:37 pm Report abuse
(i) Follow Briton's lead - he is on-topic: Free-trade or Protectionism.

(ii) There is a significant history of giant ship founderings in certain sea conditions. The structural design constraints are not linear with increasing length.
MaxWave - two Esa satellites surveying the oceans - 2000 onwards, finds on average 3 'Perfect Storm' waves of over 25m (81ft) high each week. The are back-breaking waves for such long vessels.
Over the last two decades more than 200 super-carriers have been lost at sea.
Storm waves are the declared cause, but

(iii) there is a surprisingly good correlation between the financial need to realise insurance claims and supertanker founderings, especially off the West African coast. Smaller, older supertankers are not cost-efficient, and what better way to finance larger, state-of-the-art versions than to 'lose' the old to finance the new.
Usually recorded as 'Lost with all hands', without evidence.
6 Uncle Sam (#) Dec 21st, 2011 - 10:16 pm Report abuse
2 Pirat-Hunter (#)

What in hell are you talking about???

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!


Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!