Shout it loud enough and even the good guys believe it
By John Fowler for Penguin News, Stanley, Falkland Islands - My first contact with Latin America came in 1971, when my wife and I spent four days in Montevideo while waiting for a ship to carry us to the Falkland Islands. We received such amazing hospitality and kindness from the Uruguayans we met then, that this small, but perfectly-formed country has had a place in my heart ever since.
More recently, I had also developed something of a soft spot for Uruguay's President, Mr José Mujica, since I learning that the official transport of this former guerrilla fighter who spent many years as a political prisoner, is an Opel Corsa and that his only personal asset is an aging Volkswagen Beetle.
The antithesis of the popular image of a Latin American president and described sometimes as an anti-politician who speaks the language of the people, President Mujica apparently gives some 87% of his official salary to charity and lives off the meagre profits of a small-holding and road-side flower and vegetable stall owned by his wife Lucia Topolansky.
In the light of this admiration, President Mujica's decision this week to ban Falkland-flagged vessels from Uruguay's ports came at first as a source of great disappointment. On reflection, however, while still hoping that he will either reverse or not enforce a decision which could cost Uruguay's economy dearly, I have come to realise that it was consistent with my image of him as an unusually simple, straight-forward and sincere man. For years, it seems, we in the Falkland Islands have come to expect that Latin American leaders will publicly side with Argentina over the sovereignty issue to the extent of signing declarations of support, but have counted on them being duplicitous enough not to do anything about it.
My problem then is not with President Mujica acting according to his beliefs, but with what he has chosen to believe, namely that the Falklands/Malvinas sovereignty issue is a colonial one, rather than one about the rights of a small emergent nation to the self-determination promised by the Charter of the United Nations.
This is proof, I suppose, if proof were needed, that if like the President of Argentina you repeat something long enough and loud enough it tends to be believed, however wrong it may be.
Suggested Stories
-
May 23rd 2013
Cristina Fernandez administration limits overseas dollar extractions to a minimum
-
May 20th 2013
Brazil trapped by Argentina and Venezuela economic mismanagements
-
May 21st 2013
Falkland Islands: it’s a three-side debate; Argentina must recognize Islanders right to decide their future
-
May 17th 2013
Argentina’s ‘autarkic project’ worsens bilateral relations and multiplies problems
17 comments Feed
Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.
The UN doesn´t promise you anything, you tricky lier. On the contraty it clearly states the Malvinas question is a particular COLONIAL situation that need to be RESOLVED by negotiations between the UK and Argentina.
The Uk won´t be able to deny the dispute for much longer.
Good job Argentina! Good job Latiamerica!
Pirats go home.
I.M., you are right, the UN promises nothing, it guarantees self-determination to the Falkland Islanders by UN Charter Article 73 to which Argentina is a signatory and UN GA resolution 1514(XV) which covers the case of the Falkland Islands, for which Argentina voted
Great Britain tried negotiations in good faith, but Argentina attacked it and ended negotiations
Take nationalist Argentine objection to the UN International Court of Justice if you dare...?
Thank's Mr. G
Let's be frank. Argentina is not that stupid that it would take Britain on again, but Uruguay, that's altogher different.
I would hope that Britain backs Uruguay against any threat from the regions crackpots (or should that be crackheads).
That's not very nice. Shame on you.
You are beginning to sound a little bit desperate.
And so you should. Not one square metre of British South Atlantic Territory will ever belong to Argentinian scumbags. No offence.
The process of decolonisation and the Falkland Islanders' rights are unaffected.
In fact please quote one UN resolution stating the islands are Argentina's and must be returned to her.....I can't :)
But it is funny to read their wild ravings.
Merry Christmas
Or you will what, run away and cry to your LATAM 'friends'? Who will do exactly nothing (read below and GET REAL).
15 ynsere
Very good post, but I suspect you are wasting your time with the Argentinos.
Even though their only real chance of getting anywhere is the ICJ, they will not do that because they know that the Islanders history of 9 generations of settlement would be considered before anything else.
Argentina has no history of legal settlement, they have lost before they even start.
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!