US was aware of Argentine military “systematic plan to steal babies born in captivity”
The administration of US President Ronald Reagan was aware of the “planned” stealing of babies born in captivity from jailed political prisoners, during the Argentine military dictatorship (1976/1983), since there was a “clear decision” to hand them to families considered faithful and reliable to the regime, said a former top US official.
“It wasn’t one or two cases, or one or two officers involved, but many, thus there was a pattern, a plan” to take away those babies from their biological families which they considered “non trustworthy or communists”, said Elliott Abrams former US Assistant Secretary of State.
He added that during his post as Under Secretary for Human Rights issues, from 1982 to 1985, he “does not recall any case” of systematic stealing of political prisoners babies in any part of the world as the one implemented by the Argentine military.
“It was the worst of all cases” among all dictatorships and military regimes in those years both in Latin America and in Asia said the former Reagan administration officer who added that it was his task “to advance the human rights issue in those countries”.
Abrams made the statements on a video conference from Washington as a witness in a case in a federal court in Buenos Aires. He also revealed that in talks with then Argentine ambassador Lucio García del Solar he suggested that “the Church could help to solve the matter”.
The issue was “very difficult to address not only for the military but for any future democratic government” said Abrams who described Garcia del Solar “not as a representative from the dictatorship but rather as a member of the future civilian government and deeply democratic”.
The issue was considered in a private meeting 3 December 1982 to certify “the advance of Argentina in human rights issues” and the babies immediately cropped up since it was “the most important human rights problem in Argentina” and “we were talking of live children” and not the disappeared which the State Department considered dead.
Abrams wrote a memo of his meeting with Garcia del Solar which was declassified by the State Department in 2002, which then led solicitor Alan Lud from the Plaza de Mayo Grandmothers to have him testify in the court case on “the (military) systematic plan to steal babies”, which is coming to an end.
In his report Abrams to higher ranks at the State Department, Abrams said he suggested forming a committee with members of the Catholic Church, academia and other sectors and Ambassador Del Solar promised to take the proposal to the Argentine ministry.
When questioned Abrasm said he could not recall if the suggestion was a specific instruction, and also admitted the State Department at the time did not have an estimate of the cases involved.
The US official mentioned meeting Argentine human rights’ activists such as Emilio Mignone and Adolfo Perez Esquivel but did not reveal the State Department sources from which the issue of stealing babies born in captivity or snatched following the killing of their parents, was considered of “extreme graveness”.
“The reason for this conduct was that on the one side the military considered the families (of the babies) non apt to bring them up because they were communists” and on the other side there was a specific decision to hand them to couples that could not procreate “but were loyal to the dictatorship and for which a child was a blessing”.
“This is not a personal reasoning, it was an analysis circulating at the time in the US government”, however thirty years later he could remember the origin of such reasoning.
Abrams between 1985 and 1989 declared he was Assistant Secretary of State for Latin American affairs during the Reagan administrations. Currently he is an advisor on Middle East issues.
Suggested Stories
-
Feb 16th 2012
Sean Penn should return his Malibu estate to the Mexicans
-
Feb 16th 2012
US disregards Argentine claim of UK’s Falklands’ and South Atlantic ‘militarization’
-
Feb 22nd 2012
Train crash in Buenos Aires leaves 49 dead and at least 600 injured
-
Feb 22nd 2012
Brazil and Uruguay with the most expensive per capita Legislative branch
25 comments Feed
Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.
what a load of bullshit !!
The only surprise is that anyone is surprised at this latest news, except a few black sheeps of course.
It wasn't me gov! You can just picture this can't you.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xqwNsmzCbM
Two different issues : 1. War against terrorism
2. Conflict of '82
You are obviously living in Tejas for a reason……….. you Babynapper.
www.mediaite.com/tv/rep-louis-gohmerts-train-wreck-terror-baby-interview-on-ac360-2/
And as Cristina said to the Nation the day before yesterday:
El RI25 le rompe el siete al 601.
question for you : Balsa o Seineldin?
Con Z.......
Luckily, for Artillero’s immortal soul, he was too young to participate in those unfortunate events.
But he is certainly in denial and still a faithful soldier against the “Red Menace”.
So, my dear Doctor, paraphrasing Violeta:
Al pasito por las piedras, cuidado con los juanetes.
El Think.
In the first paragraph of this article whatever it is.......
I say :
This is what we do,have always done ,as soon as we know the truth we have always told these who seek the greater knowledge over that which is most popular to believe......
Which, in the vernacular, would be “Tread softly and carry a big stick”, wouldn't it?
Nope, my dear Shilean Brother….
You where supposed to find and read the last two lines of that verse:
……………………………
……………………………
que aquí no ha nacido naide
con una estrella en la frente.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zE13TMrHeFk
Fraternal abrazo
El Think
I guess back then propping up military regimes (and even toppling democratically elected ones (i.e. Allende) was not seen as dangerous because it was all in the name of some war against communism. So, what I am getting at is, who the hell cares US of A if you knew? More importantly is that you didn't care and more importantly, you never took ownership for what you did.
Oops ! blame it on the spell check Mr Think :-) ..... y no seas tan chupa culo con el chileno
Kindness shouldn't be confused with weakness..., botija.
Or, as Violeta puts it:
”Discreto, fino y sencillo
son joyas resplandecientes
con las quel hombre ques hombre
se luce decentemente.”
Where have you been? Out commiserating for the Concordia? I'm bloody sure you know how it feels to have your bottom rent asunder and full of dead seamen after a night's cruising...
Your opinion on @8, please? :-)
No “Z” in Milo.
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!