Monday, February 6th 2012 - 21:37 UTC

Portsmouth prepares to receive the Royal Navy’s biggest warships ever

Britain’s Portsmouth Naval Base is preparing to be the home of the biggest warships ever built for the Royal Navy. A specialist rig began six weeks of drilling on Friday, sampling the seabed in the harbour and in the Solent.

The Queen Elizabeth carrier is expected to arrive in Portsmouth in 2016

The tests will pave the way for major dredging work in a couple of years' time to allow the 65,000-tonne HMS Queen Elizabeth and Prince of Wales aircraft carriers to safely and easily enter the harbour.

The two flagships are 10.000 tons heavier than the last traditional-style carriers to serve the Royal Navy - HMS Ark Royal and HMS Eagle, which were both decommissioned in the 1970s - and much larger than any current warship based in Portsmouth.

The existing channel used by ships needs to be widened and deepened to accommodate the new carriers. The berths in the base itself also need to be excavated and a suitable turning circle provided in the north of the harbour - the draught (the depth of a loaded vessel in the water taken from the level of the waterline to the lowest point of the hull) of the sisters will be 36 feet (11m).

Survey work was carried out a decade ago - not least on the wreck site of the Mary Rose to ensure that everything of historical importance had been recovered from Henry VIII flagship.

In addition, a detailed environmental analysis of the harbour and its approaches was carried out in 2004, while the bridge simulator at HMS Collingwood has been adapted to test the new route to prove that the carriers can enter or leave the harbour in a range of tidal and weather conditions - so far more than 180 simulated arrivals and departures have been conducted.

Captain Iain Greenlees, who is in charge of the transformation project ahead of the ships' arrival, said the work by rig 'Deep River' would build on existing understanding of the geology of the harbour and its approaches:

“Work so far has identified the route which balances best navigational safety, the lowest environmental impact and cost,” he explained.

“The analysis of these final boreholes will complete our detailed understanding of the work that will be required and allow us to apply for final approvals - and run a competition for the work.”

The Queen Elizabeth is due to be launched in 2014 and will arrive in her future home of Portsmouth two years later; the Prince of Wales is due to join the fleet towards the end of the decade.

Next year work will begin to replace telephone cables between Southsea and the Isle of Wight, followed in 2014-15 by major dredging work. Captain Greenlees said around three-and-a-half million tonnes of seabed need to be moved.

The Deep River rig will drill 27 bore holes to a depth of 104 feet (32m) along various parts of the proposed route. The rig will be brightly lit and will be operating 24-hours-a-day.

It will need to dig five holes in the harbour entrance which will cause some minor delays, but Queen's Harbour Master Commander Nigel Hare said every effort has been made to keep disruption to a minimum - including suspending work at weekends - and 50 residents of Spice Island were being informed of the impending work.

Commander Hare added that the work is very important in the run-up to the new carriers arriving in Portsmouth.

“It's hoped that harbour users and local residents will understand the relatively short-term inconvenience of the rig set against the much longer-term benefit of the project to the harbour - and the city”.
 

18 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.

1 briton (#) Feb 06th, 2012 - 10:05 pm Report abuse
A most powerful ship indeed,
A projection of power that will send the message, that Britain,
Can and will, if needed,
A fine ship in deed, alas their will always be some that are envious and think it provocative .
2 Viscount Falkland (#) Feb 06th, 2012 - 10:41 pm Report abuse
Then let us prevoke with 65'000 tonnes up the river plate ! Boom Boom !
3 briton (#) Feb 06th, 2012 - 11:12 pm Report abuse
New planes
www.baesystems.com/Sites/Taranis/Newsroom/autoGen_110612124240.html

new ship
www.aircraftcarrieralliance.co.uk/en.aspx

type 26.
www.royalnavy.mod.uk/The-Fleet/Ships/Future-Ships

HMS Astute
www.royalnavy.mod.uk/The-Fleet/Submarines

its all coming together, just nicely, thank you .

plymouth / portsmouth / falsane
all very busy, very soon .
4 Marcos Alejandro (#) Feb 07th, 2012 - 02:46 am Report abuse
Tuesday 07 February 2012
“American commanders decided the Royal Navy had nothing to contribute to the mission”
“A Whitehall confirmed the sequence of events and described the international negotiations over the flotilla as “humiliating” for Britain”

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/9064697/Britain-had-to-plead-with-US-to-take-part-in-Iran-flotilla.html
5 Malvinero1 (#) Feb 07th, 2012 - 03:16 am Report abuse
Excellent target for Exocet missiles.....
6 Lord Ton (#) Feb 07th, 2012 - 05:29 am Report abuse
They didn't help you win last time MoreCrap !

1982 - May 7th - French President, François Mitterrand, talks to his doctor;
“ I had a difference of opinion to settle with the Iron Lady. What an impossible woman, that Thatcher! With her four nuclear submarines on mission in the southern Atlantic, she threatens to launch the atomic weapon against Argentina — unless I supply her with the secret codes that render deaf and blind the missiles we have sold to the Argentinians. Margaret has given me very precise instructions on the telephone …. I have been forced to yield. She has them now, the codes. If our customers find out that the French wreck the weapons they sell, it’s not going to reflect well on our exports.“
7 THOR94 (#) Feb 07th, 2012 - 12:59 pm Report abuse
@5 Malvinero1 Considering that the Excocet missiles are around 30 years old, and that our new Type 45's, can track and destroy any that you fire, i dont think that any missiles would get within a few hundred miles of the carrier, or your planes for that matter :')
8 ChrisR (#) Feb 07th, 2012 - 03:05 pm Report abuse
7THOR94

It is very likely, unless many of the components have been changed in the 30 years of storge (and can anybody see Argentina spending money on that) that these missiles will NOT fly.

And any that do will be unable to target modern ships.
9 Zethee (#) Feb 07th, 2012 - 03:11 pm Report abuse
THOR94 : Not even that, Thor.

Considering that our anti ship missiles have rougly double the range of the Argentines, goodluck using them.
10 THOR94 (#) Feb 07th, 2012 - 06:03 pm Report abuse
@ I think that we can all agree that although the RN isn't as strong as it has famously been, it does and can 'pack a punch', and out matches anything that Argentina could possibly field .
11 briton (#) Feb 07th, 2012 - 06:12 pm Report abuse
Living in a past world, anything of an update is new to these guys,
You know like, bows and arrows, sticks and stones,
Ships and harbour entrances, but to be fair to them,
Can you actually fit an exocet to a rowing boat,
12 Malvinero1 (#) Feb 07th, 2012 - 09:04 pm Report abuse
Living in a past world, anything of an update is new to these guys,
You know like, bows and arrows, sticks and stones,
Ships and harbour entrances, but to be fair to them,
Can you actually fit an exocet to a rowing boat,
Even with those we sunk half of the crap brit fleet...
13 briton (#) Feb 07th, 2012 - 09:29 pm Report abuse
Can you actually fit an exocet to a rowing boat.
14 THOR94 (#) Feb 07th, 2012 - 09:39 pm Report abuse
@12 Malvinero1 (#) If you say that about the fleet we had, you must really be ashamed of your fleet now :')
15 Malvinero1 (#) Feb 07th, 2012 - 11:45 pm Report abuse
Can you actually fit an exocet to a rowing boat.
Why? The MOD is thinking to fit that,after they run out of oil from uk??
@12 Malvinero1 (#) If you say that about the fleet we had, you must really be ashamed of your fleet now :')
No I am not.But we put the money where it belong: The people.No like those corrupt conservatives you have in uk...Poor deluded brits.....Without industry,running out of oil.....
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
I am GLAD I DO NOT LIVE in the uk!
16 briton (#) Feb 08th, 2012 - 07:47 pm Report abuse
so are we
17 cLOHO (#) Feb 14th, 2012 - 06:35 pm Report abuse
whos running out of oil??? thought we just found a hat load. Dont we buy oil like the rest of the world. I would question your own presidents credentials didnt she along with hubby make a packet on a dodgy deal with land. Premier financial capital of the world vs corned beef & c.heap plonk. Regarding fleet people in glass houses. cant wait for the two supercarriers to come on line, will be worth the wait. Do you want to buy another ex Royal Navy Carrier like your last relic that ran back to harbour.
18 THOR94 (#) Feb 14th, 2012 - 10:07 pm Report abuse
15 Malvinero1 (#) Hardly the level of poverty is much higher in Argentina, and we have to have a defense force to protect from the crafty argies such as yourself....Im glad i live in the UK :) A true Democracy...

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!

Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!