Thursday, February 16th 2012 - 21:13 UTC

UK Science minister calls in the Falklands en route to Antarctica tour

Science and Universities Minister David Willetts has become the latest UK politician to visit the Falklands. A spokesman for Mr Willetts said he would make on Thursday a “transiting visit” en route to an engagement in Antarctica.

Minister David Willets: what matters is the right of self determination of the people in the Falklands

Tensions have risen in recent weeks between the UK and Argentina over the sovereignty of the Falklands ahead of April 2 that marks the 30th anniversary of the start of the Falklands conflict when Argentine marines invaded the Islands.

Mr Willetts' spokesman said he was making a “long-planned” tour of the British Antarctic Survey in Rothera and would call at the Falklands on the outbound and inbound legs of his journey to pick up connecting flights.

He said the Conservative minister did not have any “official” engagements planned during his stopover. However Mr Willetts would hold talks with British military commanders while on the islands.

He is also due to host a dinner with Governor Nigel Haywood and hold discussions on policy matters, including whether the Islands' students should have to pay tuition fees, the newspaper said.

Mr Willetts also reiterated the position expressed by Prime Minister David Cameron that the Falklands would remain British as long as Islanders wanted to do so.

“What matters is the right of self-determination of the people in the Falklands,” he told the Times. What matters is the right of self-determination of the people in the Falklands.

“They made it very clear they wish to remain British and this should be seen as part of Britain’s historic links to the south Atlantic and the Antarctic.”

The minister is traveling with Dr Mike Pinnock, head of science resource planning at the British Antarctic Survey, and once in the Antarctic, he will spend several days examining how £40 million a year is spent on research in the region.

Minister Willetts flew from RAF Brize Norton Wednesday night according to The Times. He will stay at Mount Pleasant, the military base 30 miles southwest of Stanley, the capital.

Argentina has called on the UK to enter into negotiations over the Islands' future - something Britain has refused to do.

The impasse has sparked strong words from both sides and prompted United Nations secretary general Ban Ki-moon to issue a statement expressing “concern about the increasingly strong exchanges”.
 

28 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.

1 GreekYoghurt (#) Feb 16th, 2012 - 09:30 pm Report abuse
”The impasse has sparked strong words from both sides and prompted United Nations secretary general Ban Ki-moon to APPEASE THE EXPANSIONIST POLICIES OF ARGENTINA and issue a statement expressing “HAS ANYONE SEEN MY SHOE? YOU, HAVE YOU SEEN MY SHOE?”.
2 stick up your junta (#) Feb 16th, 2012 - 10:01 pm Report abuse
Sea Lion, a field discovered in 2010 north of the islands by British explorer Rockhopper, will generate $10.5 billion of tax and royalty revenues for the Malvinas over its estimated 20-year life, Edison Investment Research said on Thursday

www.buenosairesherald.com/article/92951/britain-set-for-malvinas-islands-oil-windfall

Run that by me again Christina baby,you want us to give you the Falkland Islands :-))))))))
3 GreekYoghurt (#) Feb 16th, 2012 - 10:08 pm Report abuse
@2 will that be enough to give the Falklands pavements? I cannot see any pavements.
4 stick up your junta (#) Feb 16th, 2012 - 10:19 pm Report abuse
Pavements? they will have enough to pave the whole of the Island if they want, heard talk that when the money starts rolling in,the Falklanders are going to have a big gold statue of Galtieri put up as a thank for making sure the argies dont get their dirty little hands on their home's
5 GreekYoghurt (#) Feb 16th, 2012 - 10:28 pm Report abuse
Could they use some of the money to put up a minefield museum in celebration of the Argentinian militarisation of an island in the South Atlantic? It's a huge danger to the local population. Maybe they could talk about the current British attempts to demilitarise said minefield.
6 briton (#) Feb 16th, 2012 - 11:14 pm Report abuse
United Nations secretary general Ban Ki-moon
He had his chance and blew it,
He should have referred Argentina to the ICJ,
Now he should mind his very own??
And the islanders and the brits should tell him to get lost,
Any crumbs given to this woman just excites her to the point of satisfaction.

We all know where this is heading,

.
7 Beef (#) Feb 16th, 2012 - 11:36 pm Report abuse
The Falkland Islanders should use their future oil wealth to simply rub the Argie's noses in it. A statue on the western point of the islands of a hand with a V for victory sign should do the trick, perhaps they should offer CFK a grant for some surgery to cover those wrinkles from all that frowning?
8 GreekYoghurt (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 12:04 am Report abuse
@7 I think that's already happening with the current disparity between the Islanders ability to amass wealth and democracy and the Argies ability to lose wealth and democracy.

That disparity is only going to get bigger.
9 Rufus (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 02:31 am Report abuse
He's heading for Rothera, which is on Adelaide Island.
Given that there are only two bases on the island, Rothera and Teniente Luis Carvajal Villaroel Antarctic Base (that the Chileans have run as a summer only station since 1984 when BAS gave it to Chile) it's not altogether surprising that he isn't catching a ship from anywhere else, seeing as how summer is coming to an end and Teniente Carvajal will soon be shut for the winter.
10 tobias (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 03:09 am Report abuse
There are historic links between the Falklands and Britain, that is to be respected. There are no historic links of Britain and the Antarctic except somef forlorn explorers, and this “visit” is a clear politization of what is a territory where all politics have been frozen. The UK is violating the Antarctic treaty (again, as they did in 2009 with their plan to claim Antarctic seabed as territory).
11 Malvinero1 (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 04:02 am Report abuse
Sea Lion, a field discovered in 2010 north of the islands by British explorer Rockhopper, will generate $10.5 billion of tax and royalty revenues for the Malvinas over its estimated 20-year life, Edison Investment Research said on Thursday

AHHAHAHHHAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAHAH!
Except that they forget to say that there is no way that figure is true and that there is nothing they can do WTHOUT THE SUPPORT FROM ARGENTINA....
What a bunch of LIARS..my GOd!!
12 Idlehands (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 07:05 am Report abuse
In other news a penguin has landed on the Falklands and the Argentine government has declared it a grave threat to world peace and begin official protests at the UN. Meanwhile dockworkers board and pillage a Sri Lankan ship in port to exact revenge. Reports from the UK detail increased hospitalisations of British News junkies suffering from the new phenomena of 'split sides syndrome' that is sweeping the nation.
13 stick up your junta (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 07:11 am Report abuse
WTHOUT THE SUPPORT FROM ARGENTINA

:-))))))
14 GreekYoghurt (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 07:24 am Report abuse
@10 The UK has had a long long historical connection with Antarctica. A lot of nations have.

@12 Precisely.
15 Xect (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 08:01 am Report abuse
Post 11, 13 - The Falkland's does not need the support of Argentina, please stop being so deluded.

Do you honestly think the oil companies would have invested tens of millions already if it did? The oil is ABSOLUTELY viable without the support of Argentina.

I think you're living in a alternative reality.....
16 BenC30 (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 08:15 am Report abuse
@11. Without the support from Argentina? You mean like blockading shipping?
What great support! Argentina is living in the stone age if they think there are not ways for the oil industry and the Falkland Islands to get around the issue of the banana-republic neighbour known as Argentina.
17 GreekYoghurt (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 08:16 am Report abuse
@15 to be fair to the Argies, we did have talks with them about sharing of the benefits of oil and such but they decided they didn't really want that and left the talks in 2005.

The great argentinian business sense, nearly surpasses their skills in naval strategy.
18 stick up your junta (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 08:28 am Report abuse
Jees you argies do think a lot of yourselves

www.eia.gov/security/distable.html

Global Oil Supply Disruptions Since 1951
19 lsolde (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 11:00 am Report abuse
@11Malvinero1,
Now now, Malvin, behave yourself. That's a good gentleman.
20 Malvinero1 (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 11:27 am Report abuse
WTHOUT THE SUPPORT FROM ARGENTINA

:-))))))
Sure losers.DO you know the infrastructure you need for off shore????
Just talk to the people that work,in a much better cndition in TdF.....

Now isolde.....my GOd....Grow up isolde
21 GreekYoghurt (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 11:40 am Report abuse
@20 of course we know the infrastructure required for offshore drilling, we just go with a list of what we currently have in Aberdeen for Gas Prospecting and then ask for the same again, but for Oil. You can buy those sorts of things out of a box these days, and it's more than worth the long-term investment if it means we don't have to include the Argentinians. They're already about to build a deep water port too, so they won't need you for that either.

It might need support from Chile and Uruguay for local expertise in building them though. Rest assured, Argentina will not be needed, they can get back to their economic blockade.
22 Conqueror (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 12:29 pm Report abuse
@10 Do you have a problem with history? Let's try a few facts.
7 February 1821 Captain John Davis (born Surrey, England in 1784), a sealer, MAY have been the first to set foot on Antarctica.
1893-1895 Confirmed landing of Henryk Bull, Carstens Borchgrevink and Alexander von Tunzelmann at Cape Adare. These three men are, respectively, Norwegian, Anglo-Norwegian and a New Zealander.
1898-1900 The Southern Cross Expedition (aka British Antarctic Expedition 1898–1900) was the first expedition to deliberately over-winter on the Antarctic mainland.
1901–1904 Discovery Expedition – led by Robert Falcon Scott, on 30 December 1903, reached (82° 17′S) (aka British National Antarctic Expedition, 1901–04)
1901–1903 Gauss expedition (or First German Antarctic Expedition) – led by Erich von Drygalski
1901–1903 Swedish Antarctic Expedition – led by Otto Nordenskjöld with captain Carl Anton Larsen
1902–1904 Scottish National Antarctic Expedition – led by William Speirs Bruce
1903–1905 Third French Antarctic Expedition – led by Jean-Baptiste Charcot
1907–1909 Nimrod Expedition – On 9 January 1909, Ernest Shackleton reached 88° 23 ′S (Farthest South), and on 16 January 1909, Professor Edgeworth David reached the South Magnetic Pole at (72°25′S 155°16′E) (mean position) (aka British Antarctic Expedition 1907-09)
1908–1910 Fourth French Antarctic Expedition – led by Jean-Baptiste Charcot
1910–1912 Japanese Antarctic Expedition – led by Nobu Shirase
1910–1912 Roald Amundsen's South Pole expedition – On 14 December 1911, reached the South Pole (90° S)
1910–1913 Terra Nova Expedition – On 17 January 1912, Robert Falcon Scott, reached the South Pole (90° S) (aka British Antarctic Expedition 1910)

I've stopped around 1910 for lack of available characters. Please notice that FIVE out of eleven expeditions from 1898 were British. If you think that the Antarctic Treaty bans visits by politicians, what were Pinera and Mujica doing there 13-15 January?
23 The Cestrian (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 12:31 pm Report abuse
I'd like to think that if and when the oil is discovered that we can share the benefits with our chilean and Uruguayan friends. It would be good if they became prosoperous south americans out of this.
24 GreekYoghurt (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 12:45 pm Report abuse
@23 just ensure you import Vast quantities of Chilean wine and Uruguayan food. Then just think of the lifestyle of sitting staring out at the Atlantic with a glass of fine wine and a Chivito.

... can't be so bad.
25 Xect (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 12:46 pm Report abuse
Poster 20 is a broken record with no argument other than to recite the unfounded words sprouted by another half-wit of the same ilk.

Apparently none of the oil companies realise this isn't a viable option whilst investing tens of millions into the project.

Hmm, I think I will take the professional opinion of the oil companies over some hate filled lunatic.
26 stick up your junta (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 01:17 pm Report abuse
Wouldnt take too much notice of Malvinero1 , he reckoned there was no oil anyway
27 briton (#) Feb 17th, 2012 - 07:38 pm Report abuse
he is just anti british and very proud of it apparently .
28 lsolde (#) Feb 18th, 2012 - 01:21 pm Report abuse
@20Malvinero1,
You finally did it!
You learned to spell “LOSER” & not “LOOSER”.
l'm so proud of you, Malvin♥

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!

Advertisement

Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!

Advertisement