South Georgia plans removal of reindeer herds with Norwegian advisors
The South Georgia Government has released the report of a reconnaissance trip by two experts from the Norwegian Nature Inspectorate investigating the practicalities of eliminating reindeer from the South Georgia Island.
According to the May edition of South Georgia Newsletter the two Norwegians, Henrik Eira, a Sámi (Lapp) reindeer herder and Carl Erik Kilander were accompanied during their trip and much of the time by GSGSSI CEO Martin Collins.
Reindeer were introduced to South Georgia by Carl Anton and Lauritz Larsen a century ago as a food supply for the whalers. The deer adapted well to their new habitat and flourished. In a study of the reindeer made in the late 1950s, Nigel Bonner regarded this as an 'excellent example of a successful introduction' and observed that 'overgrazing problems…do not seem to exist' except for the elimination of burnet.
However, a more detailed study by Nigel Leader-Williams in the 1970s revealed that there had, in fact, been extensive overgrazing, leading to modification of the vegetation and erosion. This, in turn, had affected the invertebrate fauna and the nesting birds.
Since then, the future of the South Georgia reindeer has been debated. The population is interesting scientifically because the two herds (estimated as numbering 2000-2500 in the Barff herd and 1000 in the Busen herd) descended from less than a score of deer introduced from Norway, and they have adapted to eating tussac grass rather than lichens.
The animals are something of a tourist attraction, especially when wandering through a king penguin colony. Nevertheless, they are aliens and have had a serious impact on the island flora and fauna. The Environmental Management Plan for South Georgia, published in 2000, recommended their removal. Since then, consultations have revealed a broad consensus.
The need to eliminate reindeer came to a head with the plan to eliminate rats in South Georgia. Reindeer would affect this by eating the poisoned bait intended for the rats, which would also cause undue suffering to the deer. It is therefore necessary to remove the reindeer before the rats. The Norwegian report gives ample reason for getting rid of the reindeer, with photos showing extreme damage to the vegetation. It also shows how exclusion cages that prevent grazing allow the vegetation inside to recover quickly.
The plan is to use traditional Sámi methods of herding and corralling reindeer, with shooting by experienced marksmen of deer that are inaccessible. This system will enable compliance with strict animal welfare regulations. It will also allow the hygienic butchering of carcasses for human consumption.
Martin Collins has said that every opportunity will be taken to collect samples for scientific study, such as gathering more information on the 'genetic bottleneck' caused by the introduction of so few animals.
Removal of the Busen herd is planned for this austral summer, with the Barff herd in the following year. This timetable will allow the rat elimination programme to proceed as planned.
The pdf of the report “Report from reconnaissance January 1st - 31st 2012 regarding eradication of reindeer on South Georgia” was posted on the South Georgia website in May.
Suggested Stories
-
May 24th 2013
Russia forced to evacuate Arctic base because of melting ice field
-
May 20th 2013
Almirante Irizar en route to becoming another major scandal for Argentina’s navy
-
May 18th 2013
Argentine Antarctic campaigns disarray and corruption claims turn off recruiting
-
May 18th 2013
Chile investigates alleged case of blast-fishing close to a major Humboldt rookery
23 comments Feed
Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.
They stole the land, and it was clearly Argentine because the spanish gave it to Argentina (no they didn't).
RAGEEEE QUIT!
Around, all around, the sinister creatures gather.
My dread grows as doom's scythe falls against my neck.
It slays me, and darkly my
blood drips
to the dead grass.
In numbness I flail madly
while the Reaper laughs cruelly.
Now alone, my cry of mercy falls upon the uncaring winds.
Help me Santa.
This is my doom.
Link to the South Georgia website of further information: www.sgisland.gs/index.php/(h)South_Georgia_News_and_Events
They are truly imbeciles.
Next thing argentina will be claiming the entire world is theirs because its all on the same planet as their precious shithole!
:o)
The Spanish never got there.
Skewed gene pools have created our illustrious monarchies
- cull, in a Jubilee year?
But then we might have to resort to Presidents/Presidentas ....
A 'Weed' is 'a plant in the wrong place' .... these reindeer are simply weeds on legs.
Some 'weeds' can be eradicated - especially those isolated island faunas; others are super-invasive and become 'the new natural'.
I could always try the Argie argument: but I want to shoot a few Malvanistas, nobody will notice AND I have been in Uruguay for a WHOLE 13 MONTHS! So I can shoot them can't I. Goes on ad infinitum. :o)
- Law of the discovery by the Spanish vessel Leon, in 1756.
- Recognition by the world's major countries of Spain membership of the adjacent islands to the mainland (as owner of the continent).
- Recognition of other maritime states (England) by signing the Treaty of San Lorenzo (Nootka Sound) in 1790 (violated by this country in 1765, 1806, 1807, the English are characterized by respect all that sign) that prevented him from taking any island in the Spanish part of South America.
- Succession of the Rights of Spain, and human first permanent settlement in 1904 by Argentina.
- Doctrine of the Continental Shelf of the United Nations Conference on Law of the Sea, and extension of the continental shelf of coastal states.
- Whenever the Malvinas question was treated as a unit with Georgia and Sandwiches.
- Unanimous recognition of the countries of the region (OAS)
BRITISH arguments for the sovereignty of South Georgia (San Pedro) South:
- Geographic proximity?
- Force?
-? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
-? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
-? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
-? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
-? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
-? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
-? ? ? ? ? ? ?
-? ? ? ? ? ?
-? ? ? ?
-? ? ?
-? ?
-?
SOUTH GEORGIA ISLAND ARE ARGENTINE
Round spherical objects!
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!