Monday, August 13th 2012 - 21:57 UTC

UN launches new initiative to protect oceans on 30th anniversary of Law of the Sea

United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon launched on Monday a new initiative to protect the oceans and the people whose livelihoods depend on it, and called on countries to work together to achieve a more sustainable management of this precious resource and address the threats it is currently facing.

Ban Ki-moon calls to create “a new momentum for ocean sustainability”

“The seas and oceans host some of the most vulnerable and important ecosystems on Earth, but the diversity of life they host is under ever-increasing strain,” Mr. Ban said at an event in the city of Yeosu in the Republic of Korea (ROK), to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the opening for signature of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.

The Convention, also known as the “constitution of the oceans,” governs all aspects of ocean space, from delimitation of maritime boundaries, environmental regulations, scientific research, commerce and the settlement of international disputes involving marine issues. It was first opened for signature in 1982 and entered into force in 1994; there are 162 parties to it – 161 States and the European Union.

Mr. Ban praised the achievements of the Convention in helping countries establish a legal framework to guide the management of the oceans, the settlement of disputes, and the administration of the international seabed.

“Among its principles, the Law of the Sea recognizes that all ocean issues are related and that they need to be addressed as a whole,” Mr. Ban said, adding that this is in line with the development framework put forward at the UN Conference on Sustainable Development, Rio+20, in June in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

However, Mr. Ban also emphasized the need to address multiple issues that threaten the marine environment. To do this, he announced the launch of the Oceans Compact, which will seek to support and strengthen the implementation of the Law of the Sea.

“What we need is to create new momentum for ocean sustainability,” Mr. Ban said. “The Oceans Compact sets out a strategic vision for the UN System to deliver more coherently and effectively on its oceans-related mandates, consistent with the Rio+20 outcome.”

The Compact, Mr. Ban added, will provide a platform to help countries protect the ocean's natural resources, restore their full food production to help people's whose livelihoods depend on the sea, and increase awareness and knowledge about the management of the oceans.

To achieve the objectives of the Compact, Mr. Ban proposed a results-oriented Action Plan along with the creation of an Ocean Advisory Group made up of high-level policymakers, scientists and experts, as well as representatives of the private sector and civil society.

During his visit, Mr. Ban also spoke to young people at the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO, youth forum, where he asked participants to practice solidarity among generations and lead the way in implementing sustainable measures in all aspects of society.

“From public squares to cyberspace, youth are a transformative force; you are creative, resourceful and enthusiastic agents of change,” Mr. Ban said. “A sustainable future can be ours. The work starts now, and it starts with you. This is a generational imperative… a generational opportunity… that your generation must seize”.
 

7 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.

1 briton (#) Aug 13th, 2012 - 10:18 pm Report abuse
The only way, to positively protect the seas and oceans , is to ban all humans from entering them.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Then again United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon
Could always mar, the mighty CFK ,
They have a lot in common,
[Talking] being one of them .lol.
.
2 PirateLove (#) Aug 13th, 2012 - 10:35 pm Report abuse
a new UN initiative to protect and sustain food resource in the worlds oceans, a noble idea but.....how can you prevent over fishing when the countries responsible are also violating others countries borders constantly with illegal fishing, they cant respect borders they certainly are not going to respect any UN new initiative....this initiative means nothing without enforcement.
heres an initiative they want UN aid, World bank development Aid then toe the UN line or print your own money.
3 Ottona (#) Aug 14th, 2012 - 03:01 am Report abuse
...of course, guess which is the ONLY major martitime nation that has NOT agreed on the “Law of the Sea” of 1982: The EXCEPTIONAL NATION! Still need a clue ? The one EXCEPTIONAL NATION which de-actived its 4th Fleet (the Southern Commando Fleet) at the end of WW TWO in 1946, but re-activated this “4th Fleet” in 2008 - after major oil and gas deposits had been dedected under the South Atlantic...
4 slattzzz (#) Aug 14th, 2012 - 04:25 am Report abuse
The US fourth fleet that has no ships attached to it do you mean? It has been set up principly as a Command and Control centre to counter drug running and piracy in Carribean area utilising the odd ship from the fifth fleet, although Chavez's remarks not long ago about sinking US ships with his ancient russian aircraft might swing things to put a battle group off South America and militarize the South Atlantic just to see Chavez's and Turkey necks reaction, I can imagine it now lots of huffing and puffing, toilet rolls in fridge, and NO action.
5 DennisA (#) Aug 14th, 2012 - 09:55 am Report abuse
International control of everything, by unelected bureaucrats, is that really a good idea? The EU fisheries policy has caused considerable damage to fish stocks because cumbersome laws take over from common sense. Those who make their living from the sea know they have to conserve stocks for their own livelihoods and for future generations. It is why there have been generations of fishermen, “man and boy”. That is now being destroyed. EU grants to Spain for super trawlers led to UK fisherman being banned from going to sea, and has decimated the UK fishing industry, because we lost our own territorial waters.

The oceans form 70% of the earth's surface. Do we really want to hand that over to the UN and its bureaucrats. We already have sustainable fishing areas operated by inshore fisherman that under threat of closure because of the implentation of “marine reserves” under Agenda 21, where there are no problems to be solved.
6 Conqueror (#) Aug 14th, 2012 - 12:46 pm Report abuse
@5 I'm not sure about “International control of everything, by unelected bureaucrats”. Surely there is a difference between the UN and the EU? It seems to me that the UN mostly operates by consensus. Whereas the EU makes up its own “rules” and then imposes sanctions on members that they consider have not “complied”. Ever heard of a UN member being “fined”? But I'm glad that you've mentioned Spain. There's a country that should be banned from sending its fishing boats to sea for the next 5 years. At least! In fact, they should be banned from fishing, except in their own inland waters.

In fact, I believe that British politicians are mostly to blame. In line with the British character, they seek to “be reasonable”. The trouble is that they don't seem to take into account that other countries aren't reasonable. Take Spain in the Mediterranean. It has “conservation areas” that can't be fished. Elsewhere they have fished their stocks to extinction. Now they invade Gibraltar's waters (BGTW) to fish. I have a preferred solution. A simple warning. “You are fishing illegally in Gibraltar waters. Cease your activities immediately and leave. Failure to comply will result either in your arrest or being sunk. There will be no further warnings.”

As a thought, isn't Agenda 21 non-binding and voluntary?
7 British_Kirchnerist (#) Aug 15th, 2012 - 06:00 pm Report abuse
#1 She's far to good for him =) But she could certainly do his job, and be better at it =)

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!

Advertisement

Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!