Mexican political turmoil: opposition leader Lopez Obrador decides to create his party
Mexican opposition leader Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who twice contested second-place losses in presidential elections, said he would leave his coalition, a move that threatens to create a rift among leftists in Congress.
“I have separated from the parties that form the Progressive Movement,” Lopez Obrador said. “This isn't a rupture: I leave in the best of terms.”
Lopez Obrador said he would dedicate all his efforts to change Mexico with a new organization called Morena that has yet to be legally incorporated as a party.
Lopez Obrador accused President-elect Enrique Peña Nieto of laundering money and buying votes in July's presidential election, but he lost a legal bid at the end of August to overturn the results.
Peña Nieto will be sworn in Dec. 1 and has promised fiscal, labour and energy reforms, which Lopez Obrador is likely to resist. Lopez Obrador's supporters blocked many of Mexico City's main thoroughfares for weeks after he narrowly lost the 2006 election. There were a few protests this year, but they failed to reach the scale of 2006.
Lopez Obrador called for a “peaceful civil resistance” before thousands of his supporters in the capital's main square, but he once again refused to recognize Peña Nieto as Mexico's legitimate president.
Javier Oliva, a political scientist at the National Autonomous University of Mexico, said as many as 15 deputies in the lower house and two or three senators from the leftist coalition will likely join Lopez Obrador in his new movement.
“This is going to have important repercussions” Oliva said. “This will create divisions and a future rupture among the left.”
Suggested Stories
-
May 18th 2013
Maduro admits to knowing “the IDs and all” of the 900.000 Chavistas who did not vote for him
-
May 18th 2013
Argentina forces cancellation of all Lan flights by suspending ground services
-
May 17th 2013
Colombian president Santos announces he will seek second term
-
May 17th 2013
Argentina’s ‘autarkic project’ worsens bilateral relations and multiplies problems
7 comments Feed
Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.
The problem in the left in Mexico is precisely this, they get angry with each other and get out to make their own “separate” party, making the left weaker and their oppinions divided, we have a good number of left leaning partys but ppl generaly dont vote for them, ppl are weary of those partys or think they are just there to get money.
So far PRD is the left leaning party strog enough to compite with PRI AND PAN but if it wishes to win it must get a more clear plan, unity between members, and a good strategy for goverment, their old fight for ppl is not believed anymore because they themselves hardly have made much different decisions when in a position of power. Cuatemoc Cardenas is trying to reform the party precisely for this, and I think it would do the party good to do that.
This is indeed a problem of the left, in Britain too =(
Sep 11th, 2012 - 02:50 am
And Argentina. Argentina since November has ceased to be anything like a democracy, if truth be told we live in a kleptocracy!!!!!
really? :o , I thought that was just the left in Mexico :) especially with Hollande in France and Zapatero in Spain, I didn´t even know there was left in Britain, I must inform myself more on Europe politics.
But indeed, this problem with unity is holding left down, even if I dont agree with all their oppinions, their input is neccesary IMO especially when it´s constructive and made for the well being of society. I would even be ok with a left goverment if it oppened itself to inputs and oppinions from other political policies and of course, to the ppl itself. I think Humala in Peru is a good example of this.
5 Jose
I agree, democracy in Latam needs time and development like any other country that lived under autocratic goverments from a period of time, change to democracy is not an automatic thing because wearines and a natural distrust of goverment can get in the way. Chile and Costa Rica are indeed good examples on how get a fairer distribution of power. Also, being of the left or socialist or Right oriented should not serve as a justification for radicalism.
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!