Ecuador suggests transferring Assange to its embassy in Sweden so he can be questioned
Ecuador proposed on Friday transferring Wikileaks founder Julian Assange from its embassy in London where he has taken refuge to that in Sweden where he is a suspect of sex related crimes. However this depends on Britain and there has been no official reaction to the proposal.
Foreign minister Ricardo Patiño told reporters that there are several possibilities to resolve the standoff with Britain over Assange, including “that his statement be taken in our embassy in London or that Ecuador get authorization to transfer him, if necessary, to our embassy in Sweden so that the case can proceed there with the protection of Ecuador and meeting the needs of Swedish justice”.
Assange has been holed up in Ecuador's embassy in London since June 19, seeking to avoid extradition to Sweden for questioning over sex crimes allegations. Assange claims the Swedish sex case is part of plot to make him stand trial in the United States over his work with Wikileaks, which has published large troves of secret US documents. Sweden and Washington reject the claim.
Ecuador granted the Wikileaks founder political asylum on Aug. 15, but British authorities have repeatedly warned they will arrest him if he steps foot outside the diplomatic mission.
Patiño said he was hopeful a negotiated solution could be found for the case, although added that Ecuador does not discard appealing to international courts if discussions with London do not prosper.
Only last week Ecuadorean president Rafael Correa said that Patiño would be attending the UN General Assembly and “expects to meet with Foreign Secretary William Hague and continue the dialogue on the Assange case”.
Correa said that in his opinion the whole issue could be solved once Sweden gives guarantees that Assange won’t be handed to the US or that the Swedish prosecution questions the Australian at the embassy in London, “it’s perfectly feasible, and we can then overcome the dispute; why doesn’t the Swedish prosecutor want to do so, who knows”.
Anyhow Correa said Ecuador “has never closed the doors to dialogue, we will continue to dialogue, but what we will never do is negotiate human rights, they are nonnegotiable”. The Ecuadorean president confirmed he will not be attending the UN assembly.
Suggested Stories
-
May 21st 2013
OAS General Assembly will hold major debate on the drug problem in the Americas
-
May 17th 2013
Uruguay’s José Mujica lauds booming Brazil ties
-
May 23rd 2013
Europe’s three largest economies call for stricter rules on corporate tax avoidance
-
May 23rd 2013
Cristina Fernandez administration limits overseas dollar extractions to a minimum
50 comments Feed
Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.
I love it... :-D
1, it might be a good idea, it gets him away from the UK,
And relieves us of this rubbish, it has created,
2, they know they can’t get him from the British, so getting him transferred to Sweden; they will have more chance,
3, Ecuador has embarrassed herself, the help she thought she would get from South America has evaporated, and all the mouth and threats has now back fired,
4, they now want to save face, and to move it from Britain to Sweden.
5, they have no wish to fall out with great Britain,
Ah problems problems,.
.
In the meantime, Assange has created a prison for himself and locked himself in.
He has two options. He can surrender or he can stay where he is until he dies. No skin off our nose.
Ahhh! I see a flaw in my logic. Assange has no honour.
First do, than think.
Than, Why for godsake did we do that.
How's that house arrest working out over there at the Ecuadoran embassy?
Are you learning any Spanish yet?
You hero you!
Like in Iraq?...
Smart girls open their mind, easy girls open their...
Is that the best you can do, Marcos?
Very weak - you are like PrvtesHunter - nothing you can argue so you resort to mindless vulgar rants, and repeat irrelevant nonsense about unrelated issues.
You represent Argentina, well.
Elaine said ”“The British government takes the rule of law seriously”
I say, only when is covenient to them.
“.Smart girls open their mind, easy girls...”
So, what is that supposed to mean?
You seem to like that sexual analogy - repeating it again?
Making an incoherent, incomplete, sexual reference does NOT make a point - it is a childish, irrelevant, empty comment. Hardly clever.
give up - the Ekkies have shown themselves to be fools, abandoned by their 'supporters'. :-D
He sounds like a 12year old in a school playground
trying to acuse us of something we have no intention of doing,
changing subjects again.
at least we dont crawl up the backsides of everybody you bumb into, thanking them for their invisable support.
you will be all alone, so alone and lonley with no help.
still,
if only you had a light switch,
China perhaps .lol.
Your a bit like Finbarr Saunders but not so funny
Sounds as if the Ecuadorians have grown tired of Assange already, and it has only been a few weeks. Imagine how they will feel after 15 years...
As for Assange, he isn't going anywhere.
You people wanted him, now keep him.
@15 Slugs open their mouths. How you doing, slug?
@18 But then, the argie government, and argies generally, NEVER take the rule of law seriously. Have you paid Repsol yet? You do remember the bit in your “constitution” that says you have to pay compensation BEFORE you nationalise a company, don't you?
@26 Difficult. www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3ae6b3823c.html indicates that is an OAS convention. The United States is a member of OAS. There is no statement that the USA neither signed nor ratified the convention. Note the “reservations”. Should the United States have put in a reservation? Perhaps you should check the Library of Congress!
It isn't whether Assange wants to stay put or not. It's about how long the Ecuadorians are willing to put up with him.
Cracks are beginning to show. Sooner or later Assange will be extradited to Sweden, where he will face the allegations of sexually assualting 2 women.
If the US want him, they can ask the Swedes for him, although they may have to wait until he has answered charges in the UK for breaching his bail conditions. All those people who believed in him and put up his bail money, are now counting the cost of that trust.
However, the US doesn't want Assange. I mean who would? This narcassitic man has done more to destroy the reputation of wikileaks than the US could've dreamed to do.
The longer he is running around spinning his wild fairy tales, which will be proved untrue, the more it hurts wikileaks, and its support is already falling away; mainly because of Assange and his egotistical belief that he is above the laws of mortal men.
www.oas.org/juridico/english/sigs/a-46.html
From US State
www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2012/08/196663.htm
Now onto subject. I would not allow ja to leave to the embassy in Sweden, it's probably larger and much nicer. The ecuadorians went him out of their, what, 3 bedroom apartment that serves as a embassy? They all chose this bed, let them all lay in it. When the ambassador decides it is time for ja to face bail flight charges and the international warrant, ja will be out of there. The stink is rising, it will get to them.
Do they have rights to the basement or will they just cremate him on the gas hob.
One thing's for sure I wouldn't be thinking of letting the Ecuadorian Embassy relocate to somewhere with a garden.
I'm sure that every time JA has Chinese food delivered, he is checking the dumplings for hidden microphones. LOL
even then, it would be just looking for excitement - pretty monotonous sitting in a small flat alone ( no prostitutes want his business), ironically in the middle of a very exciting city.
How frustrating for him. How poetic!
If he does, he'll do it with as big a “martrydom” splash as he can.
Is it possible one day he could sneak his way out of the embassy with help from outside?
“Is it possible one day he could sneak his way out of the embassy with help from outside?”
One would suppose so, but even if they did not get caught, the incident would be escalated from a minor irritation to a real Internationsl Incident.
The perpetrators and their nations would be making a huge political error
Are you saying, his crime too trivial?
Are you saying it happened too long ago?
Are you saying it is not worth the effort to enforce the law?
-Assange did not steal a loaf of bread. It was not a crime of desperation to feed himself.
-He is accused of sexually assaulting 2 women.
-He is guilty of fleeing custody while granted bail (a privilege) because he feared losing his court case.
-Those who put up a bond for him, forfeited their money.
-He has attempted to embarrass and discredit the British, Swedish, and US governments for his own benefit, and damaged international relations
Hardly “ prissy legalism”!!
You're patronisingly dismissive. You have no argument.
When does a nation decide which laws to ignore and which to uphold?
:-)
I think the elephant's been shot.
It's like the Monty Python Dead Parrot sketch, it's no more.
“ wikileaks remains the elephant in the room...”
Wiki leaks is now irrelevant.
In the world of exposés, Assange himself, is fast becoming irrelevant too.
His self-imposed exile has sidelined him completely.
How much attention did his last “news”- release get?
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!