Friday, November 30th 2012 - 06:15 UTC

Falklands’ fishing company seeking good management label from MSC

For the first time a Falkland Islands fishing company is seeking to have its good management certificated by the internationally recognised Marine Stewardship Council (MSC).

CFL Marketing Manager Janet Robertson

Consolidated Fisheries (CFL) Marketing Manager Janet Robertson told Penguin News.

CFL entered into assessment in August this year. She believes that for the Falklands as well as CFL it will be advantageous to have an MSC certified fishery.

In Stanley this week to assess the company for certification have been Stephanie Good, Fishery Assessment Manager from the MSC and Jim Andrews of Interset Moody Marine, which is the certification body assessing the situation.

Mr Andrews told Penguin News this week that the way the MSC standard works is that any fishery globally is assessed against three principles: whether the fish stock is in good condition, impact of the fishery on the marine environment and how well the fishery is managed.

Mr Andrews is here to gather information, interview people and find out about all three areas of the fishery. He said ultimately, if the fishery is certified, the packaging material of the Consolidated Fisheries product will bear an eco-label. The idea is that the consumer sees the label and favours an MSC certified product.

For the fishing company, in terms of processes and retailers in many markets being certified by the MSC can be the difference between having access to the market and not, pointed out Mr. Andrews.

This is not the case currently with the Toothfish fishery, but for other fisheries, he said, if you are not MSC certified your range of buyers is very much reduced. Also there can be an effect on the price you get per kilo.

The assessment process looks at the measures that are in place to prevent illegal and unlicensed fishing.

Mr Andrews said that MSC is also very keen to ensure traceability through the whole supply chain, so when they certify a fishery, they certify what happens at sea up to the quay side and then they look at everything beyond that as well.

Asked what it was she was specifically observing in the Falklands, Stephanie Good said that part of her job was to look at the whole MSC fishery standard and review it in terms of how easy it was to interpret in practice.

She said, “I’m here to see in a practical setting how the standard is interpreted and what happens in the assessment process. “Hopefully I can learn things that I can bring back and feed into a review of standards which is planned for next year.”

Asked what changes, if any, had resulted in CFL operating procedure as a result of their bid for MSC certification, Janet Robertson said, “much of what was needed to be done was actually work that is done by the Falkland Islands Government Fisheries Department, because it is the management of the fishery which is critical: the science, the knowledge about the species and the impact on the environment.

“In that respect our application was heavily reliant on the Fisheries Department which already has a reputation for good, solid management.”

From the company’s side, Janet Robertson said that compliance with the MSC standard was more about making certain things more explicit and having clearer protocols in place, especially with regard to stock assessment principles.

They also had to look at their routine operating practices and protocols on board the vessel and make sure that they were up to the required standard, and that there were clear practices for the crew to follow which would minimise the impact of fishing activities as much as possible.

She said that everything the company had to do in this regard was already being done; it was just a case of making sure that standards were maintained and any malpractice was avoided.

Asked what she thought the company would get out of MSC certification, Ms Robertson said that the answer now was probably slightly different from what it would have been two or three years ago.

For many years the South Georgia Fishery was the only MSC certified toothfish fishery, and as a result of that, although the demand for certified toothfish was not great, it did mean that because there was a relatively small fishery providing it, there was a premium paid if you were selling an MSC certified fish.

Since then with the certification of a number of other toothfish fisheries around the world, and probably with supply exceeding demand, there was less likely to be much of a premium paid.

Although Consolidated Fisheries do not sell into Europe as a matter of course at present, if they wanted to they would be severely limited as to where they could sell it, if they were not MSC certified. (Penguin  News)

 

11 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Comments should refer to article. Thank you.

1 ChrisR (#) Nov 30th, 2012 - 11:00 am Report abuse
Well, as the Argentine government can't manage to piss in a pot they have no chance to achieve independent certification for their fisheries.

But heh, why bother with assessment? Jut put the logo on the packaging anyway and ignore another International Trade complaint went it comes in, it’s the Argentine way after all.
2 Huntsman Extraordinaire (#) Nov 30th, 2012 - 12:04 pm Report abuse
The Article says it's the Falklands asking for it Chris...
3 Idlehands (#) Nov 30th, 2012 - 12:41 pm Report abuse
Will Argentina send a flotiila of fishermen on a poaching mission to ensure the Falklands waters can't be deemed a sustainable stock?

They've been threatening to overfish for a long time.
4 Argie (#) Nov 30th, 2012 - 01:58 pm Report abuse
3 idlehands
I'm afraid you should have choosen idlebrains instead.

Argentina does not poach. Our country fishes within her territorial waters.

By the way, those islands you mention, are placed within Argentine territorial waters, disputed but real.

It does bother me not, however. I respect the rights of the islanders who have been there for more than 6 generations.

Cheers!
5 Furry-Fat-Feck (#) Nov 30th, 2012 - 02:36 pm Report abuse
@4 Argie (#)
Nov 30th, 2012 - 01:58 pm

“It does bother me not, however. I respect the rights of the islanders who have been there for more than 6 generations. ”

So if you respect their wishes you will accept that fishing in their waters without their permission is in fact poaching.

Besides. It is closer to 8 generations. Even more in some cases.
6 Idlehands (#) Nov 30th, 2012 - 03:34 pm Report abuse
4 Argie
Oh no - an Argentine throwing playground insults for 5 year olds. I think I'm going to cwy & cwy & cwy
7 ChrisR (#) Nov 30th, 2012 - 04:12 pm Report abuse
2 Huntsman Extraordinaire

Yes, I DID realise that.

And what do you think AG are going to do when they do? (Please see 1) :o)
8 ErneLatAm (#) Nov 30th, 2012 - 04:25 pm Report abuse
Some clarifications:
1) The company is looking for the MSC certification of local Toothfish fishery (not that clear at the article)
2) Toothfish stock is shared not just with Argentina mainland, but also with Chile and Peru, believe it or not
3) MSC is discussing currently new standard which requires some level of coordination between all the countries operating over the same stock to meet the minimum score to pass. That will make difficult this process.
4) Argentina has currently three MSC certified fisheries: scallops, anchovy and hoki. It is the only country in Latin America, together with Mexico, having certified fisheries.
9 British_Kirchnerist (#) Nov 30th, 2012 - 09:26 pm Report abuse
Seems an ok thing for the FFC to do; wouldn't be affected by sovereignty really...
10 Troy Tempest (#) Dec 01st, 2012 - 05:48 am Report abuse
@9BK

another 'token' BK post.

BK, you seem to just show up at the end, to post something, anything, innocuous or irrelevant.

Granted, that's better than finding something negative to say, but it begs the question, “do you get paid by the Thread, or by the Post??”
11 ChrisR (#) Dec 01st, 2012 - 10:24 am Report abuse
8 ErneLatAm

Then how do RG justify the continuance of approval given TMBOA is on record instructing the fishing fleets to damage the stocks so that the Falklands (there are STILL no Malvinas, you pratts) suffer depravation?

This is clearly against the MSC registration.

I will need to pursue this matter with MSC.

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!

Advertisement

Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!

Advertisement