Wednesday, December 19th 2012 - 20:12 UTC

US court tells Sea Shepherd to stay away from Japan’s whaling fleet in Southern Ocean

US court has ordered conservation group Sea Shepherd to stay at least 500 yards away from Japan's whaling fleet in the Southern Ocean. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit banned the group from “physically attacking any vessel engaged by the plaintiffs”.

Founder Paul Watson is on a Sea Shepherd vessel preparing to pursue the Japanese fleet

Japan's fleet ready to sail to the Antarctic

The court was responding to an appeal by Japan's whalers, after an earlier case was rejected. The injunction remains in force until the court formally rules on the appeal.

The ruling by the court also bans Sea Shepherd from “navigating in a manner that is likely to endanger the safe navigation” of any whaling vessel.

Every year, vessels from the US-based Sea Shepherd follow the Japanese whaling fleet south to try and disrupt its activities. Numerous collisions, clashes and boarding have occurred in the past, with each side blaming the other for aggressive tactics.

The group was founded by Paul Watson, who is wanted by Interpol after skipping bail in Germany. He is accused of endangering the crew of a Costa Rican ship that was fishing for sharks in 2002. He is currently on a Sea Shepherd vessel preparing to pursue the Japanese fleet.

Japan's fleet sails to the Antarctic in the autumn or winter each year, returning the following spring.

There has been a ban on commercial whaling for 25 years, but Japan catches about 1.000 whales each year in what it says is a scientific research programme.

Critics say it is commercial whaling in another guise. Australia and New Zealand are pursuing a legal case against Japan in international courts. Last year Japan cut short its whaling season, a move attributed to the harassment by Sea Shepherd.

Japan's Institute of Cetacean Research, which oversees whaling welcome the court’s move. But Sea Shepherd vowed to continue its activities, questioning the legality of the ruling.

“It is a complex situation whereby a United States court is issuing an injunction against Dutch and Australian vessels carrying an international crew, operating out of Australia and New Zealand in international waters,” it said in a statement on its website.
 

9 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Comments should refer to article. Thank you.

1 lsolde (#) Dec 20th, 2012 - 09:14 am Report abuse
Leave the whales alone!
Scientific research, indeed!
Then sell the meat openly in the markets.
2 Rufus (#) Dec 20th, 2012 - 11:22 am Report abuse
I'd agree with you about leaving the whales alone, but if there was an outright ban that everyone kept to then Sea Shepherd would probably immediately switch to harassing trawlers, seiners and anyone else who they felt was opposed to their self-appointed mission to protect the sea.

What their recent actions look like is more an attempt to make martyrs of themselves. And in polite company it is generally considered as rude to try to take other people with you when you commit suicide.
3 reality check (#) Dec 20th, 2012 - 01:08 pm Report abuse
@1 Isolde.
Here, here! these bastards won't be satisfied until these gentle majestic creatures are extinct.
4 GeoffWard2 (#) Dec 20th, 2012 - 04:40 pm Report abuse
I think the judgement is about 'physically attacking'.
Sounds like good 'life and limb' law.

BUT the judge should have had allowable alternative and legal provisions expressed in open court, expressed by the court itself.

This way, 'the USA' establishes that it is cognisant of the larger issue of protection of the planet from underhand killings of this 'flagship' endangered class of intelligent large mammals.
5 RedBaron (#) Dec 20th, 2012 - 05:15 pm Report abuse
The US ruling is strange when it is the Japanese who have a stated aim to kill over 1,000 whales this year alone in the name of 'scientific research'.
Since when was it necessary to kill animals to research them?
Haven't they researched the whales enough by now to know everything they need to know?

It's interesting to hear how many hundreds of tons of unsold whale meat are in store in Japan because apparently the Japanese people aren't so keen on buying the stuff any more, so why do they need to hunt these majestic animals into extinction, just to keep a few hundred fishermen in work?
6 Ayayay (#) Dec 21st, 2012 - 12:17 am Report abuse
Sea Shepard will do what they want to assist other sentient beings.
7 Ernie4001 (#) Dec 21st, 2012 - 03:01 am Report abuse
What a hell have these yankees to say anything in this case. Are international waters, so seems that they took very seriously when they believe themselves as “world owners”
8 reality check (#) Dec 21st, 2012 - 10:12 am Report abuse
Didn't I read somewhere that the Australians said their Navy would take action against any whalers in their oceans. Well done cobbers!
9 British_Kirchnerist (#) Dec 24th, 2012 - 04:51 pm Report abuse
Pagthetic, a US court represses US citizens from protesting Japan's breach of international norms if not treaties and laws. I wonder if any money changed hands?

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!

Advertisement

Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!