Brazil warns countries that have banned imports of beef because of atypical BSE
The world’s top beef exporter, Brazil, will give countries that curbed imports of its beef after a case of mad cow disease until March to drop the measures or it will file a complaint at the World Trade Organization, farm ministry officials said.
Five countries have implemented full or partial bans on Brazilian beef imports since confirmation this month of a case of atypical bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), or mad cow disease, in a cow that died in 2010.
Atypical BSE cases can occur spontaneously in elderly cattle and the 13-year-old animal in the Brazilian case never developed full-blown BSE, testing instead positive for a protein that is the causal agent of mad cow disease.
Brazil had previously launched a diplomatic offensive to fend off restrictions over the death of the cow in the southern state of Parana which was confirmed only this month by Brazilian authorities.
But now Brazil has promised to take retaliatory action against countries rejecting its beef, saying there are no grounds for such action.
“March is the deadline,” said Enio Marques Pereira, Secretary for Animal and Plant Health at Brazil’s farm ministry, after a meeting at the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) headquarters Friday.
Officials stressed Brazil has kept its status as a country presenting negligible BSE risk under an OIE classification, and that OIE norms consider safe for consumption products like red meat and gelatine, even when BSE has been declared in a country.
The Brazilian cow in question never entered the food chain.
Countries that suspended Brazilian beef imports include Egypt and Saudi Arabia which rank among Brazil’s top 10 beef buyers, but Marques said the economic impact so far was “very low”, noting that Egypt was only banning meat from the region where the BSE case occurred.
The other countries which have imposed temporary bans are South Africa, Japan and China.
The OIE welcomed the fact that Brazil had managed to detect the atypical case in a national herd of more than 200 million, though logistical problems at a laboratory delayed the analysis of the animal’s tissue since its death in 2010.
“We’re rather reassured by the fact that Brazil reported this case,” Bernard Vallat, director general of the OIE, said.
He stressed that an end to the use of cattle feed containing matter from ruminant animals had succeeded in nearly eradicating BSE after tens of thousands of cases in the 1980s and 1990s, mostly in Britain.
Brazilian beef exports declined 14% in 2011, to 820.239 tons, establishing it as the world’s third largest beef exporter behind Australia and the US, according to Global Trade Atlas.
Middle East countries have become the main client for Brazil’s beef.
The Middle East was the largest region for Brazilian beef shipments in 2011, with Iran (130.649 tons), Egypt (96.937 tons), Saudi Arabia (27.951 tons) and Israel (15.937 tons) all taking substantial volumes.








15 comments Feed
Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.
The world’s top beef exporter, Brazil
Second last paragraph:
world’s third largest beef exporter behind Australia and the US
Either way, it gives you great faith that even though it was one cow, it was still reported.
I agree, but you have to remember the hysteria that accompanied the original outbreaks and how we would ALL be contaminated with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), even if we did not die of it.
Politically, people are frightened of their electorate thinking they are not taking adequate precautions about their health.
I think Brasil acted completely correctly in this matter and it is a pity it has turned out like this. I wonder if they will be as open should another case be found.
a synopsis of news stories GMO pollen polluting lawsuits from Mercator.com
Earlier this year, Riceland Foods, the largest rice cooperative in the U.S. won its lawsuit against the Bayer Corporation after its natural long-grain rice was contaminated with Bayer's unapproved genetically engineered rice. Thousands of similar lawsuits have been filed.
Canadian canola farmer, Percy Schmeiser, was sued by Monsanto for patent infringement in 1998, after his fields were found to contain Monsanto’s patented GM canola. But rather than accepting Monsanto’s bullying ways, he decided to fight back—and won. In March 2008, Monsanto agreed to pay for cleanup costs. Since then, Schmeiser’s fight for farmer’s rights has been featured in a documentary film, “David versus Monsanto.”
Other recent cases of contamination of conventional and organic crops with GM varieties include maize in Ireland and Spain, and corn in Germany.
And I would add, Brazil.....
As for the ban on beef exports introduced arbitarily at short notice some time ago, what importer is going to have any confidence in the performance of contracts?
We in Uruguay were delighted with this decision as most of the contracts were switched to us And we do things properly over here
Brazil, if it is truly an international nation should continue to take the high road knowing that it took the proper action in reporting the case. It should also respect every nation's responsibility to it's citizens to protect them from desease ridden products. Most remember the UK's outbreak in the early 90s, millions of animals were destroyed, yet the UK seems to recover because they openingly dealtyh with their problem and it did not tarnish their reputation.
Which all that being said........the politics of trade is an ungly business and always will be. It naive to think otherwise.
I don't think Brazil is any different.
In my U.S. state, all the cows living here live on grass ranches, and it never gets too hot or cold :))
In my U.S. state, all the cows living here live on grass ranches, and it never gets too hot or cold
really ?!!!!Would u b kind enough to tell me Your U.S state?!!
'cause what I sow till today was totally different!!!!
In Urguay, it seems that the cettle is raised mostly on grass ranches without using corns.
Consumers are insisting quite rightly on high standards of animal welfare and I think quite rightly so. Apart from which its good business for the beef farmer. An animal under stress will fatten or reproduce much more slowly than one under stress. They are herbivores and thats thier natural environment and alimentation. Uruguay has fairly strict controls on this but of course we could do better but we are getting there and this is reflected in our international beef export prices.
Yasu Yes unfortunately cattle ranching cannot compete with the inexorable rise in grain and soya prices and is being pushed onto marginal lands and even these are being invaded by the grain and soya people who are just speculative miners of soil fertility and balanced natural ecosystems. Governments think all farmers are making the returns of the grain barons and treat beef ranchers as if they receive the same returns and tax them accordingly forcing them into considering them to plough up thier land to contribute to a future post soya eroded desert to make a living
Havent us humans learnt anything from the results of the Oklahoma dust bowls of the 30s or the wrong Australian adage that rain follows the plough?
I am not a tree hugger and as a farmer have to make a living from my land. I may be the owner of my land but really I am just a custodian of it for future generations who will farm after me , I hope with the same philosophy and respect for the land
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!