Monday, January 7th 2013 - 14:14 UTC

Argentina gains a new ally in its fight against hedge funds: WEF’ Schwab

Argentina’s worldwide court battles against the hedge funds which did not accept the restructuring of its defaulted debt and are after the country’s assets, has gained another ally, the president of the World Economic Forum, (WEF) Klaus Schwab.

Klaus Schwab said that new international rules are needed to address speculative funds (hedge funds)

This comes in addition to the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York Preetinder Singh “Preet” Bharara who in an amicus curiae brief said the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals to which he wrote, featured a “novel interpretation” that is “incorrect and adverse to the US' policy interests.”

In an interview with the Swiss daily Sonntags Zeitung, Schwab president of the Davos WEF has asked for more international financial regulations arguing there are many sectors excluded, such is the case of the ‘speculative funds’ (hedge funds or ‘vulture funds’, according to Argentine jargon).

“We are still missing rules that limit crazy drivers at full speed driving along the financial highways” said Schwab regarding the current economic slowdown and warned that “we can run into a new accident any moment”.

Schwab added that the new international rules agreed at Basel III which force banks to hold more provisions are an advance “but not enough”.

“There are still many sectors excluded such as the speculative funds (hedge funds), and we need new international rules” added the finance expert.

The next Davos WEF is scheduled to take place from January 23 to 27 in Switzerland and will be hosting over forty heads of state and government, said Schwab in the interview.

However Schwab admitted that the world’s leading economies representatives could probably not be attending in full force since China has recently undergone its ten year major reshuffle and President Barak Obama is in the process of naming his new cabinet.

It is a fact that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is stepping down.

Furthermore the other major powerhouse Germany might not be represented by Chancellor Angela Merkel who this year faces federal elections.

Nevertheless the complete list of attendants is to be published mid January.

Schwab started the Davos economic international forum in 1971.

In New York US Attorney in Manhattan, Preetinder Singh “Preet” whose office has nailed some seventy people, including a number of hedge fund managers and analysts is adding his voice to the fray over Argentine debt. He has joined the chorus urging an appeals court to rule against NML Capital from Elliott Associates.

In an amicus curiae brief, Bharara wrote that the lower-court judge erred when he ordered Argentina to pay holdouts from its 2001 default before it paid those bondholders who accepted Argentina's debt exchanges, and a serious haircut, in 2005 and 2010.

Bharara said the ruling, which has already been upheld by the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals to which he wrote, featured a “novel interpretation” that is “incorrect and adverse to the US' policy interests.”

Some 92% of defaulted debt-holders accepted the exchange. Elliott affiliate NML Capital and fellow hedge fund Aurelius Capital Management did not, and have won a number of recent court rulings against Argentina.

For its part, Argentina has both promised to abide by the US rulings and to take its fight all the way to the Supreme Court, and vowed never to pay the holdouts.

Bharara isn't alone in joining the fight against Elliott: BlackRock CEO Larry Fink also chimed in, following Alliance Bernstein, Brevan Howard Asset Management and a number of hedge funds which own the restructured debt.
 

18 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Comments should refer to article. Thank you.

1 ChrisR (#) Jan 07th, 2013 - 02:48 pm Report abuse
Well of course “Some 92% of defaulted debt-holders accepted the exchange” and there is a blindingly obvious reason for this: they were mainly banks who wrote the loss against their customers in higher fees. The banks lost nothing.

What about the individual investors like the Italian families who TRUSTED AG at the time and have been ignored up to now by the bunch of crooks running the country? Is it right to call these people ‘vultures’ especially when you consider the main protagonist is the biggest crook in AG who presently has the glorious title of President of Argentina. Despicable cow.

And, what about the vultures who own the restructured funds (and paid very little for them) and are “happy” with the reduced return UNTIL Singer started winning against the crooks of AG? Now it’s all wrong of course BECAUSE THEY WON’T GET WHAT SINGER WILL GET.

No. I don’t care that the UK were in the forefront of legislation against ‘Vultures’. What do you expect when the Square Mile has all the vested interests sitting in the Conservatives pockets? The prick Camoron is a multi-millionaire (in Sterling) and wants this to succeed because all his mates will benefit even if the real investors (the individuals) will not.

The real problem of course lies with the issuers of the debt bonds. Will anybody (with a brain) EVER trust AG again? Only the stupid or avaricious will and they deserve everything that happens to them.
2 yankeeboy (#) Jan 07th, 2013 - 03:11 pm Report abuse
Chris, The largest % of the re-negotiated bonds were taken up by orgs that are controlled by the Arg gov't or Banks within Argentina. I think it was upwards of 75% but I would need to search around to find the number.
So this 92% number they keep throwing around as “accepted” is not wholly accurate since only a small portion didn't take their marching orders directly from Nestor.
3 Vuggevise (#) Jan 07th, 2013 - 04:10 pm Report abuse
Except of course that Klaus Schwab didn't actually express any support for Argentina's position and its attempts to avoid seizure of its assets.
4 Nostrolldamus The 5th (#) Jan 07th, 2013 - 04:46 pm Report abuse
And the defeats keep on coming...

Argentina is writing a glorious page in financial world history.
5 Vuggevise (#) Jan 07th, 2013 - 05:01 pm Report abuse
@4 Nostrolldamus The 5th

Oh dear, how exactly is Argentina writing anything, other than its own decline and demise into total oblivion, when Klaus Schwab didn't even mention Argentina by name, or express any support for anything that is happening in Argentina?

You really are clutching at straws :-)
6 agent999 (#) Jan 07th, 2013 - 05:03 pm Report abuse
@4
but surely it makes no difference to Argentina what anybody else thinks.
7 Nostrolldamus The 5th (#) Jan 07th, 2013 - 05:15 pm Report abuse
@5

There is no decline or demise of Argentina. Dreams of a broken Brit.

@6

Of course not, but we are waging a war against the banks, and are winning on all fronts. Read the last two months of news.
8 ChrisR (#) Jan 07th, 2013 - 05:25 pm Report abuse
2 yankeeboy

Thanks for that, I did not know that the percentage taken up by AG was anything like that amount but you would put money on them buying at least some of the defaults.

What a marvellous way of getting out of 70% of your responsibility and totally legal while this sort of ‘restructuring’ is allowed.

You can see now why I am absolutely against this which seems to me to be nothing other than legalised theft.
9 Gordo1 (#) Jan 07th, 2013 - 05:25 pm Report abuse
If I were to borrow USD1 million from a bank and then, when it matures, say I can only pay USD500,000.00 the bank will still pursue me for the rest.

So why should the holders of the debt which Argentina failed to pay at the time of rescheduling now not be able to claim 100% of the face value of their holdings? Can somebody please explain exactly what is illegal or immoral in wanting their money back?
10 Vuggevise (#) Jan 07th, 2013 - 05:26 pm Report abuse
@7 Nostrolldamus The 5th

1) There is nothing but rot and decline in Argentina

2) I'm not even a Brit, you pathetic blithering imbecile.
11 agent999 (#) Jan 07th, 2013 - 05:26 pm Report abuse
@7
but you cannot be winning because as far as you are concerned there is nobody outside of Argentina that has any influence.
12 Britworker (#) Jan 07th, 2013 - 05:32 pm Report abuse
The problem is as hysterical it would be for us Brits, Argentina going into another default is not in the economic interests of the US or the Americas as a whole. All the creditors would lose out, but there has to be penalties to their disgusting behaviour. Other chaotic countries are seeing what they continually get away with and emulating their behaviour. A punishment is overdue, fingers crossed Madame Lagarde will oblige.
13 Optimus_Princeps (#) Jan 07th, 2013 - 06:22 pm Report abuse
@9 More accurately put, you are only “willing” to pay back $300,000 USD. Besides how could you outsource luxury jet rides and buy a few hundred of pairs of designer shoes if the bank wants its full million back?

Those “vultures” clearly don't understand the importance of comfort and fashion sense do they? It will take a lot more to get rid of that turkey neck, so it's a “fashion” crime to pay those people what they are owed.
14 Brit Bob (#) Jan 07th, 2013 - 08:10 pm Report abuse
God Bless Paul Singer and the American Task Force Argentina: www.atfa.org/

Interesting to note that CFK chartered a British plane for fear that Tango One would be seized.
15 ProRG_American (#) Jan 07th, 2013 - 10:10 pm Report abuse
More lovely news for a lovely lady and a wonderful people.
16 andy65 (#) Jan 08th, 2013 - 12:07 am Report abuse
@Nostrolldamus The 5th hey supermouth take this as a warning

Argentina as to be lucky all the time her enemies need to be lucky JUST ONCE

Think about it
17 Anglotino (#) Jan 08th, 2013 - 01:33 am Report abuse
I read the article twice to be sure, but where did Schwab voice his support for Argentina?

Hardly an ally when you consider what the WEF is all about.
18 British_Kirchnerist (#) Jan 14th, 2013 - 07:17 pm Report abuse
A good intervention, Cristina clearly has the support of the sensible people around the world =)

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!

Advertisement

Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!

Advertisement