MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, December 10th 2016 - 12:41 UTC

Dutch court has Shell ‘off the hook’ in four of five pollution claims in Nigeria

Thursday, January 31st 2013 - 07:25 UTC
Full article 3 comments
“We will appeal this ruling” Geert Ritsema, a spokesman for Milieudefensie “We will appeal this ruling” Geert Ritsema, a spokesman for Milieudefensie
“We’re satisfied with the outcome” said Allard Castelein, Shell’s vice-president for environment “We’re satisfied with the outcome” said Allard Castelein, Shell’s vice-president for environment
Nigerian villages farmers and fishermen presented the claim  Nigerian villages farmers and fishermen presented the claim

Royal Dutch Shell, Europe’s biggest oil company, isn’t liable in four out of five claims bought by Nigerian farmers for pollution, a Dutch court ruled. However the company’s local venture must pay compensation in one case.

“Shell Nigeria has been sentenced to pay damages in one of the cases,” Henk Wien, judge of the District Court of The Hague, said on Wednesday. “In the four cases as regards an oil spill in 2004 near the village of Goi and as regards an oil spill in 2005 near the village of Oruma, Shell Nigeria had taken sufficient precautions to prevent the sabotage from its underground pipelines.”

In October 2012, four Nigerian villagers took Shell’s Nigerian unit to court. The fishermen and farmers, together with environmental group Milieudefensie, accused the oil company of polluting land and waterways around their homes in the Niger Delta region.

“We will appeal this ruling” Geert Ritsema, a spokesman for Milieudefensie, told reporters. “We’re flabbergasted and the people have not seen justice”.

Shell said in a statement before the judgment that the oil spills were caused by acts of sabotage and that the court lacks jurisdiction to rule on the liability of a unit that is based in Nigeria. Shell said it repaired and cleaned up the spills.

“We’re satisfied with the outcome, but none of this helps resolve the local situation which is serious because of the sabotage,” Allard Castelein, Shell’s vice-president for environment, told reporters at the court. “It’s too early to say whether we will appeal, we will study the ruling, but I don’t think this will give us reason to appeal.”

The district court ruled that in two oil spills near the village of Ikot Ada Udo Shell Nigeria violated a duty of care and shall be held liable for negligence, according to Wien. Shell Nigeria could and should have prevented this sabotage by installing a concrete plug before 2006.

The three villages that were named in this case as being polluted are Goi, hit by a spill in 2004, Oruma, affected by a spill a year later, and Ikot Ada Udo, hit by various spills in 2007.

Shell, Chevron, Exxon Mobil Corp., Total and Eni pump more than 90% of Nigeria’s oil through ventures with state-owned Nigerian National Petroleum Corp.
 

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • rylang23

    Imagine my surprise! A Dutch court ruled in favor of Shell. Will wonders never cease.

    Jan 31st, 2013 - 10:06 am 0
  • GeoffWard2

    I may be wrong (please correct me if so) but the 'concrete plug' doesn't *stop* the sabotage - as claimed by the Dutch court ruling, it limits the losses following the sabotage.

    Jan 31st, 2013 - 12:05 pm 0
  • malen

    Poor Africa, you are killing their people with invented and unnecessary wars, stealing their resources (because you dont have), contaminating their land and their waters.
    Yes pay, pay for all that damage.

    Feb 01st, 2013 - 01:01 pm 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!