Sunday, January 26th 2014 - 12:36 UTC

Belize and Guatemala agree on 'road map' to address the territorial dispute

Belize and Guatemala agreed at the headquarters of the Organization of American States on a “Road Map and Plan of Action”, which has as its main objective the strengthening of the bilateral relationship between the two countries during 2014 in order to make concrete the holding of popular consultations to enable the consideration of the territorial dispute before the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

 OAS Secretary General Insulza with the two foreign ministers

 OAS Secretary General Jose Miguel Insulza emphasized the importance of the two countries deciding to coordinate joint activities, because doing so “means moving toward a more stable relationship.” “The more dense the international relations between countries, the greater their stability and permanence,” he added, because “to be able to develop significant projects in the areas of the environment, security, labor, immigration, health or education helps people to get to know and value each other.”

Belize Foreign Minister Elrington said the agreed document “evidences the commitment and resolution of the governments of Belize and Guatemala, with the support of the OAS, to seek to use our best efforts to develop the essential climate of trust and confidence.”

“We intend to seek a judicial resolution of the claim. However, this judicial solution would be empty if we do not have an excellent relationship between our countries, a relationship characterized by trust and openness between our peoples,” said Minister Elrington, who analyzed the history of the territorial dispute in which he stressed the agreement reached in 2008 between the two countries, in which they agreed to obtain the consent of their citizens to bring the dispute to the ICJ.

Guatemala Foreign Minister Fernando Carrera said the agreement “will contribute to ensure that for next year this relationship will not only remain as peaceful as it has been for many years, but also that this positive relationship will be strengthened.” In this regard, he stressed the need to ensure that the political, economic, cultural, educational and religious leaders of both countries maintain fluid and permanent communications, “because dialogue creates the possibility for peace anywhere.”

The Guatemalan Foreign Minister referred to the possibility of taking the territorial dispute to the ICJ recalling that the juridical solution “must be accompanied by a political solution based on dialogue, which is what must prevail in this process.”

“The day we get a ruling from the ICJ our people must perceive it as the culmination of a process rather than the beginning of a relationship,” he said. With the Road Map agreed, he said, “we are taking the first steps so that when the Court issues a ruling, we are all willing to accept and follow up on it.”

In closing the ceremony, Secretary General Insulza explained that the Road Map and Plan of Action outline the activities, programs and projects to be implemented to promote the Confidence Building Measures between the two countries, and added that the agreement “brings us closer to the possibility of a final resolution of this dispute.” “The plans reflected in the roadmap have an important political content in themselves, in that they contribute to a much more stable bilateral relationship,” he noted.

The leader of the hemispheric Organization also referred to the work of the OAS Office in the Adjacency Zone between Belize and Guatemala during the last ten years. Among the tasks of the office he noted that in the last year more than 100 acts of verification of incidents or difficulties that arose in the area were conducted, the resettlement of the last Guatemalan families who lived in the Adjacency Zone administered by Belize was supported, as were programs promoting a culture of peace and training aimed at strengthening the bonds of friendship between the youth of the two neighboring countries; meetings of mayors, immigration and customs officials were held; and various socio-economic projects with the communities in the area were carried out. “All this,” added the Secretary General, “was done with our main objective in mind, which is the work of verification and the work with the authorities and the Foreign Ministers of both governments.”

9 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.

1 Briton (#) Jan 26th, 2014 - 07:43 pm Report abuse
The Guatemalan Foreign Minister referred to the possibility of taking the territorial dispute to the ICJ
accompanied by a political solution based on dialogue, .

We hope CFK is listening,
this could be an example to Argentina,

all friends together..
2 Lord Ton (#) Jan 26th, 2014 - 11:37 pm Report abuse
6 years gone - still talking about talking :-)
3 Marcos Alejandro (#) Jan 27th, 2014 - 02:09 am Report abuse
Another mess created by Brits.
4 downunder (#) Jan 27th, 2014 - 07:47 am Report abuse
In times past Britain (and other European countries) had as much right to settle the Americas as the Spanish did, the Pope’s longitudinal decree notwithstanding. The 'mess' you refer to occurs when the progeny of Spanish colonialism refuse to accept this and assert that the whole place belongs to them. Well it doesn’t!
But at least Guatemela is prepared to take their dispute to the ICJ and abide by its findings, something Argentina will not do over the Falklands. And why is this? Because they know that they will lose the argument in a properly founded legal jurisdiction. So instead of behaving in a legal civilised manner they indulge in cowardly bullying, backstabbing behaviour, do their best to undermine the Falkland Islanders at every opportunity and place illegal embargos on them. Big brave Argentina! They should try and pick on a nation of their own size.
5 Conqueror (#) Jan 27th, 2014 - 01:21 pm Report abuse
@3 Shows how much you know. The “mess” was created by Spain. Belize is very popular with us British. Independent, democratic and a member of the Commonwealth. Therefore likely to be able to expect Commonwealth as well as British assistance. The Commonwealth stretches from Canada in the north to Australia in the south.
6 Philippe (#) Jan 27th, 2014 - 06:52 pm Report abuse
Some silly and irresponsible irredentist claims are still far from being buried in so-called Latin America. What these two really need is advice from countries, which were mutilated after WWs I & II, and who seem to be resigned to their fate.

7 aussie sunshine (#) Jan 28th, 2014 - 01:53 pm Report abuse
well Belice is sorrounded by spanish speaking America and today it is more Hispanic than British......
8 Narine T. Nüster (#) Jan 28th, 2014 - 04:41 pm Report abuse

When have the British picked on a nation their own size for their colonial expansion? All they, and to be fair us other European nations, did, is pick on bronze-age tribes, scattered native nations, and hunter-gatherers in small islands all over the world.

So when one sees in maps today under an island the following: (U.K), (Fr.), (Nor.), (Ned.), (Sp.), (Por.), it is not something we should be particularly proud of, since we picked on not only minuscule islands, and took them away from their rightful owners (abjuring our claims of beliefs in self-determination in the process), but on people's who had yet to discover iron, when we had gunpowder.

Brave Europeans, I think not, and we need to reflect on these acts, something we have never done really.
9 downunder (#) Jan 30th, 2014 - 06:47 am Report abuse
The events that you describe happened hundreds of years ago, they are by today’s standards unacceptable; however, times change. In those days even the pope was prepared to involve the Catholic Church in trying to facilitate and police European colonial expansion.
Those days are well and truly over, yet we have Argentina (in 2014) trying to change the names (like UK) on the map to (Arg). If colonisation was bad in 1833, it is simply appalling by today’s standards. The sections of the UN and other Latin American organisations that are paying lip service to Argentina’s attempted colonial expansion should hang their heads in shame.
It is noteworthy the brave Argentina likes to pick on the small Island nations, is that because they think they can't fight back?

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!


Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!