How Argentina torpedoed Uruguay’s FTA with the US, according to Wikileaks
Although in public former Argentine president Nestor Kirchner was supportive of Uruguay’s negotiations for a free trade agreement (FTA) with the United States, members of his cabinet warned the US embassy in Buenos Aires that Argentina would block such an initiative in Mercosur, according to the contents of several Wikileaks cables published in Montevideo and Buenos Aires.
Kirchner talked publicly about the issue for the first time in Brasilia in 19 January 2006 saying that if Argentina and Brazil “can’t offer Uruguay what Uruguay needs, “it’s not bad should they sign an FTA with the US”.
He added that “we believe in Mercosur but Argentina and Brazil are struggling to climb out from a deep economic crisis and it could be we can’t offer Uruguay all the tools its people need, so we therefore can’t impede them from reaching a deal with the US”.
Kirchner also mentioned that his peer Brazil’s Lula da Silva has stated he “was more flexible” on the issue and that he supported that stance.
Under the four full member Mercosur chart all decisions are unanimous.
However from Buenos Aires US ambassador Lino Gutierrez said it “was not clear” why Kirchner adopted that attitude, but did venture some explanations in a January 2006 Wikileaks diplomatic cable.
Gutierrez speculated that Kirchner could ease tensions with Uruguay regarding the pulp mills dispute by being supportive of an FTA, but not ordering pickets to be lifted. As a deep rooted ‘nationalist’ (who went as far as slapping extra tariffs on Brazilian shoes) Kirchner could understand that his Uruguayan peer Tabare Vazquez was intent in the best for his people.
Furthermore since Argentina’s trade with Uruguay is relatively small, “he doesn’t have much to loose with a Uruguay/US FTA”.
In January 2006, the US embassy in Montevideo believed an FTA with Uruguay was feasible in spite of the opposition from ‘radical groups’ in the country’s ruling coalition and “troublesome neighbours”.
In March President Vazquez specifically informed the head of the Embassy in Montevideo James Nealon that Uruguay is interested in an FTA with the US.
However the US embassy in Buenos Aires remained perplexed by President Kirchner’s public statements which differed entirely from what members of the Argentine Foreign Affairs ministry argued in their talks with US diplomats.
In July 2006, a US diplomat contacts Ernesto de la Guarda, from the Mercosur office in the Foreign Affairs ministry to talk about the issue. De la Guarda reports that Argentina has investment accords with 56 countries, but none with Mercosur member countries.
“We even have a bilateral investment agreement with Bulgaria but not with Uruguay” and added that Uruguay had so far not formally presented the possibility of an FTA with the US, and for which the country would have to ask for an exception under Mercosur rules, “but Argentina was not expecting any discussion on that issue during the coming Mercosur summit”.
He added that although he didn’t read Kirchner’s mind as to what would happen if Uruguay pressed with the issue he said it was “a particularly bad moment” for such an initiative.
In effect the International Court of The Hague which was just taking the case of the pulp mills dispute, rejected on 13 July 2006, an initial request from Argentina to freeze all construction at the Botnia plant as a precautionary measure
Months later in September the US embassy in Buenos Aires sends a cable to the Department of State under the heading: “Argentine Foreign Trade Secretary: why Uruguay can’t sign an FTA”.
Ambassador Alfredo Chiaradia who held the Foreign Trade post at the time sends a clear signal that the Argentine government would not allow Uruguay to sign an FTA and remain inside Mercosur, as had been suggested by President Vazquez he would be asking to fellow members.
Chiaradia told the US diplomats that if the US wanted to offer Uruguay some kind of export quotas or special tariffs, it could do so, but Uruguay as member of Mercosur could not have a reciprocal attitude.
Uruguay would be crossing ‘a red line’ if it finally agreed to an FTA which includes services, government procurement and intellectual property rights more favourable that those between Mercosur members.
When Chiaradia was asked about Kirchner’s public statements, who promised not to block Uruguay’s plans, he replied that “presidents always make generic statements” and that Mercosur rules in those areas “were very clear and inflexible”.
When the suggestion of Uruguay abandoning Mercosur was put on the table, Chiaradia said that if that happened, “the US action would have costs”.
Nevertheless and in spite of President Vazquez failed attempt, then Economy minister, and currently Vice-President Danilo Astori did not give up the idea of a FTA with the US, according to a cable from Ambassador in Montevideo, Frank Baxter in December 2006.
“Astori emphasized the strong interest of Uruguay to continue negotiations with the target of reaching an FTA; ‘we shall begin again’” was Astori’s remarks to Ambassador Baxter.
Suggested Stories
-
May 23rd 2013
Cristina Fernandez administration limits overseas dollar extractions to a minimum
-
May 17th 2013
Argentina’s ‘autarkic project’ worsens bilateral relations and multiplies problems
-
May 23rd 2013
Beware inflation: CFK announces “political groups” will keep track of prices in shops
-
May 22nd 2013
“Fed not ready to take its foot off the gas”, Bernanke tells the US Congress
14 comments Feed
Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.
Sun-tzu
Chinese general & military strategist (400 BC)
Poor Uruguay ... such back stabbing neighbours they have!
You would be right in thinking that this would damage trading arrangements for the other Mercosur members.
The statements and the politics are convoluted, but the principle is clear.
Lying is consider smart. Corruption is an honor for them. They are upholding the reputation they created. No to be trusted.! Try it yourself. We say thewy deserve each other
“From the standpoint of Sun Tzu’s philosophy of war, the Mahatma Ghandi is among the greatest warriors of all time . Sun Tzu said, “Attaining one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the pinnacle of excellence. Subjugating the enemy’s army without fighting is the true pinnacle of excellence.” Gandhi defeated the most powerful empire on Earth, the British Empire, without firing a single bullet, and he was the pinnacle of excellence”
Sun-tzu
Chinese general & military strategist (400 BC)
Mahatma Ghandi , was a great man but he was NOT a great warrior.
he actualy fought for the british, •In the Zulu war of 1906, Mahatma Gandhi commanded the stretcher-bearer corps ,,he did not defeat the british empire, far from it,He had a key role to play in India's Independence •Mahatma Gandhi was chosen for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1948, but he was assassinated before it was conferred to him •Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was born on 2nd October, 1869, in Porbandar - a coastal city in the Indian state of Gujarat.
•Mohandas was married to Kasturbai Makhanji in May 1833, when he was only 13 years old while Kasturbai was only 14.
•At the age of 18, Gandhi went to London, England, where he studied law at the University College London and went on to become a barrister.
•His experiences in South Africa brought about a realization of social injustice prevailing in the society in him, and this turned out to be a catalyst for his social activism.
•When he returned to India, he saw the same discrimination in the country and this made him take part in the Movement for India's Independence. Eventually, he spearheaded the Movement and forced the British to leave India.
•Mahatma Gandhi was assassinated by a Hindu nationalist - Nathuram Godse on 30th January, 1948.
•All throughout his life, Mahatma Gandhi practiced non-violence and truth, and advocated the need to follow these principles
Next you'll be accusing everyone that the only reason they label you an Idiot is because you're not white, when in reality race doesn't enter the decision making process at all, we call you an Idiot because you are one.
Very intresting quote from Sun Tzu there. Tell me, seeing as Sun Tzu wrote his book in 476 BC. How old exactly was he when he wrote about Ghandi in 1940's...About 2350 years old?
You are really stupid sometimes, rofl.
Also briton is very correct. Ghandi had little to do with the fall of the empire and he was one of it's largest supporters, he fired many shots in support of the empire.
“From the standpoint of Sun Tzu’s philosophy of war, the Mahatma Ghandi is among the greatest warriors of all time . Sun Tzu said, “Attaining one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the pinnacle of excellence. Subjugating the enemy’s army without fighting is the true pinnacle of excellence.”
“ Gandhi defeated the most powerful empire on Earth, the British Empire, without firing a single bullet, and he was the pinnacle of excellence”
The US Army's Gandhi Strategy
by Paul Chappell
Its a good job Gandhi came to London to study law, if he had gone to study law in your country he would have gone on to be one of the world greatest dictators instead of the great man he became. It seems you cant just win can you mate, still never mind, stick to talking about the Falklands instead of trying to talk about great men in the world you might do a little better, there again I wont hold my breath.
Sun-tzu
Chinese general & military strategist (400 BC)
Zethee I left a space this time, this way stupids like yourself will not get confuse.
I'm not confused. You quoted Sun-tzu and it's right there for everyone to see.
You're a dumbass. It's that simple.
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!