BRIC countries slam Europe’s ‘obsolete grip’ on the IMF top job
Top emerging economies joined forces to slam Europe's obsolete grip on the IMF top job, even as France's finance minister appeared to strengthen her lead in the race to replace Dominique Strauss-Kahn.
Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, known as the BRICs, sharply criticized European officials on Tuesday for suggesting the next IMF head should automatically be a European.
In the first joint statement issued by their directors at the Fund, the BRICs said the choice should be based on competence, not nationality, and called for abandoning the obsolete unwritten convention that requires that the head of the IMF be necessarily from Europe.
French Finance Minister Christine Lagarde plans to announce her candidacy on Wednesday after the European Union agreed to back her, diplomatic sources said.
Hours before the BRIC statement was issued in Washington, France's government said China would back Lagarde to succeed Strauss-Kahn who quit after he was charged with sexually assaulting a hotel maid in New York.
Emerging nations say it is time for Europe's 65-year grip on the IMF to be loosened but no clear consensus candidate to represent them has emerged.
Mexico's top central banker said some countries welcomed his decision to run, while South Africa and Kazakhstan may put forward their own candidates.
Following Strauss-Kahn's resignation, Europe has made clear it wants to stay in charge of the multilateral lender at a time when it is helping to bail out Greece, Ireland and Portugal.
It's a European consensus, Francois Baroin, France's budget minister and government spokesman, told Europe 1 radio. ”The euro needs our attention. We need to have the Europeans (on board), the Chinese support the candidacy of Christine Lagarde, he said.
But China's Foreign Ministry said it had no comment on whether Beijing would back Lagarde, a 55-year-old former lawyer, for the job.
Sources in Washington have said the United States would back a European, continuing a tradition that also allows an American to run the World Bank.
The United States and European nations jointly have power at the IMF to decide who leads it but securing support from some emerging economies would defuse a potentially bitter row over the decision.
The IMF's board will draw up a shortlist of three candidates and has a June 30 deadline for picking a successor.
Mexico's Carstens told Reuters the United States welcomed his participation in the race for the IMF job but was neutral on whether to support his candidacy.
They welcomed that I was participating and they thought it was an important part of the process,” Carstens said.








9 comments Feed
Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.
When the BRICs countries become major contributors to the IMF then they can have a larger say in who becomes the IMF president and how IMF conducts its policies.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRIC
2- Someone miss understood the news from Reuters which says:
“Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa sharply criticized EU officials in a joint statement for suggesting the next International Monetary Fund head should be a European, a convention that dates back to the founding of the global lender at the end of the Second World War....”
And below Reuters says: “However, the countries known as the BRICs (referring to Brazil, Russia, India and China) failed to unite behind a common alternative candidate, leaving the way clear for Lagarde unless she slips on a French legal case.”
What its a complete different thing than “Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, known as the BRICs, sharply criticized European officials on Tuesday for suggesting the next IMF head should automatically be a European.”
@ sj_ken
IMF quotas contributions are based on GDPs the 1st. contributor is US, the 2nd is China, the 3er is Japan, and then far away comes Germany and then Brazil, etc, etc, etc.
And the BRICs made all together a GDP close to 11 trillions dollars.
So the BRICs can bounce back the seat of the Chairman of the IMF with US easily
: )
They've got their female (it looks and act more like a male) pirate captain for a ghost ship (IMF) to continue to rape nations. This time..in Europe and soon the US.
The BRIC nations know it and understand that soon their influance will grow and grow and grow.
BRIC nations are net creditor nations to the IMF who's economy are growing faster than the in debt nations who contribute more to the IMF.
Anybody thought of an economist who gets things right?
www.businessinsider.com/bankrupt-nations-try-to-stop-the-future-from-happening-fail-2011-5
5. France 6. China 7. Italy 8. Saudi Arabia 9. Canada 10. Russia 11. India
12. Netherlands 13. Belgium 14. Switzerland 15. Australia 16. Mexico
17. Spain 18. Brazil 19. South Korea 20. Venezuela.
The UK's percentage of the quota is more than 3 times that of Brazil and more than 4 times that of Venezuela. Also more than twice that of India and nearly twice that of Russia. Only one that gets close is China. But it's still less!
Always with the wrong old propaganda and information from the ’70. Your info from wiki is wrong and old.
“China will become the 3rd largest member country in the IMF, and there will be four EMDCs (Brazil, China, India, and Russia) among the 10 largest shareholders in the Fund...”
2009 Communiqué for it’s members(2 years old). Source IMF
Quotas are calculates base on GDP size at market value (OER) and Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)
“The current quota formula is a weighted average of GDP (weight of 50 percent), openness (30 percent), economic variability (15 percent), and international reserves (5 percent). For this purpose, GDP is measured as a blend of GDP based on market exchange rates (weight of 60 percent) and on PPP exchange rates (40 percent)” Source IMF
China last year has taken over Japan and become the 2nd largest economy in the world measured in OER and PPP. USD 5.88 trillions(OER) and USD 10.1 trillions(PPP).
And Brazil expanded it GDP over 2 trillions dollars (the size of Britain)
So China quota is bigger than Japan quota.
Also China, Brazil and Mexico have contributed with loans to IMF during the crisis expanding IMF capacity to lend money about 250bn in bilateral borrowing agreements (by buying SDRs).
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!