Argentina takes Falklands sovereignty claim complaint to the Security Council
The Argentine Foreign ministry said in an official release on Wednesday that the UN Security Council had received, and incorporated to its agenda, a formal complaint on the UK latest military exercises in the Falkland Islands.
“The presidency of the Security Council incorporated as official document and distributed among its members, the complaint letter that Foreign Minister Hector Timerman addressed to the council on 5 October” pointed out the release.
The document denounces “the unilateral military activities in which the UK is involved and includes the launching of missiles from the Falklands/Malvinas Islands, scheduled for October 18/19”.
The letter from Timerman and distributed among Security Council members says that the coming exercises follow on those of last July and show the UK ongoing contempt towards the calls from the international community to end the sovereignty dispute over the Malvinas Islands in a peaceful and definitive way.
“With these exercises which continue to our days, an unnecessary tension is generated which is an affront to all those countries from the region that practice a full, effective peace commitment”.
Argentina emphasizes that the fact “the UK is a permanent member of the Security Council does not exempt it of its international obligations”.
Furthermore, “the Security Council chair and the privileges it entails, demands a special responsibility as a guarantor of international peace and security, which the UK avoids by refusing to dialogue with Argentina and with the perpetuation of actions as those described afore”.








201 comments Feed
Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.
TTt, AG et al. You were discussing buffoons the other day... May I present exhibit A, Mr Timerman for your consideration?
Is the method to complain to the UN about something, wait for a bit, then complain about exactly the same thing but change a word or two on the script in a feeble attempt to try and make people think they have something else to complain about.
How is a pre-announced test of a defensive missile a provocation to countries hundreds of miles out of their range?
I wonder if Argentina believe that the Russians and Chinese will somehow back them with actual action instead of just empty words (as they normally do)? If they do they'd be in for a great surprise.
However isn't it nice to see Argentina using their seat as South America's representative, to forward issues that concern all of South America, instead of using it to further their own lame political agenda...
...Oh wait a minute...How typical of the Argentines to only think of themselves and desperately try to use the SC to score cheap political points at home.
And since he's such an inept diplomat, he will no doubt humiliate Argentina once more, while the rest of the world looks on and chuckles.
The UK representative to the Security Council made a paper plane that looked a bit like a Vulcan and Timmerman accused him of militarising the room.
What this prat means is;
'the UK is being irresponsible in not permitting the Argentine Republic to invade and attack the Falklands with strike aircraft by deploying missiles only there to destroy an agressor and:
How dare the UK defend the right of self-determination as outlined in the UN charter, the cornerstone of all UN doctrine.
Funny how he mentions that the UK threaten South America with Ground to Air defence weapons-so presumably according to him, Chile Brazil, Uruguay, Venezuela etc etc etc fancy a pop at the Falklands with strike aircraft as well?
USA: Neutral
Russia: Neutral
China: Neutral/Support
France: Reject
Motion denied. Next case!
Something like:
Hey guys, sorry we have been such arses about your islands! Can we talk about a long term strategy whereby we can help you and you help us? Let's plan a long term approach to our differences in the hope that your trust in us will increase, and then we can build bigger bridges towards a peaceful beneficial relationship that will illustrate to the world how grown up we have become, and illustrate to the world that old enemies can work things out and profit from one another
Ah jajajajajajaja fuck it....let's just keep crying to the UN and get nowhere or anything!
Ha ha ha ha very good.
LMFAO!!!
and @16 Boovis
Lol
Security Council response: What? Why are you wasting this Council's time with this. Get out of here!
The country that openly violated and refused to comply with *binding* UN Security Council resolutions when they invaded and occupied the Falklands, held guns to the local people's heads, planted landmines everywhere (including in/around local cemeteries), held an entire town in tight quarters for a month in violation of international and human rights law, likely would have expanded their dirty war in full force onto the population there if they had a chance (helicopter rides and all), and proudly celebrates all of the above with a commemorative coin, is now abusing their rotating privileges to vainly complain that the people entrusted to protect the Islanders right to self-determinaton (a fundamental right that the aggressor country denies with levels of postmoderist silliness that would make comparative literature professors green with envy) are conducting exercises to make sure that his country doesn't ever dare try to do that again?!??!
Well.. uh... yes. And who would be surprised. Kirchner said as much when she went over time a few weeks ago. And they expect to be taken seriously.
Basically he's saying that Britain not giving in to Argentina's ridiculous demands is a threat to peace...logically that means that Argentina's endgame for achieving their demands is military action.
So, you've sent one of your politicians to the UN security council TO MAKE THINLY VEILED THREATS OF WAR if your demands aren't met. Seriously is everyone in your country this stupid?
Sadly not,
Brain dead indoctrinated and stupid nationalist.
But hey, why take it to the security council,
Very slippery move,
Perhaps you know something we don’t.
Please remains us who is on this council.
Great Britain, USA , France , CHINA , Russia.
And what,
Russia==we say give em to argentina or else
China= give em the Falklands or we sail on the noon tide
France= hey don’t drag us into this, we helped you before,
USA= ok, were in charge now, brits give em back to argentina or the fleets will descend on the UK .
Great Britain,== give em back or the royal navy will be sent to London.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
The next comedy showing will be later,
Ya just couldn’t make it up.
But hey, let no one say you didn’t try.
Ha ha ho ho ho, ha ha , ho ho ho . Christmas is coming
oh sorry missed Iceland,
give em back or the trawler wars start again. arrrrhhhhh
@9 @16 Brilliant. LOLs
Yes, excellent way of spending taxpayer's money. Come on Argies, get out your pots and pans, it's bangin' time again!
CFK will ask for the resignation of the security council on the grounds of not complying to the wishes of the directive.
She will demand the totally removal on health grounds, to be replaced by a truly modern democratic council that truly represents the Americana’s,
She will nominate.
1, Venezuela
2, Cuba
3, Argentina
4, Iran
5, Syria
6, North Korea
And special members of privilege
7, Russia
8 , China
9 Spain.
And last but not least, the arbitrator.
10, Ghana
[in return for the boat back]
so they say.
Nice one.
@35 Burn1938
It's the age old trick, distract the electorate by using the Falklands as a whipping boy.
British style
argentine
hypocrisy!!
CFK;S asylum.
In a way I would like that Argentina get smacked in the face at the Security Council. Hopefully, that would cause CFK to get piqued and then decide to have Argentina leave the UN. It is shameful we belong to that organization.
the falklands are the innocent party in all this.
and interestingly
the british, only crime was to help this innocent party.
and iterestingly
the guilty party in all this,
still stinks its the innocent party.??
Whatever you say, if it makes you feel better. You are a threat to world peace, you are an evil force in this world. The truth hurts, but it is the truth. And the UN is a joke, we should withdraw immediately what benefit is it to us anyway in anything? Keep the money at home.
[45]
if argewntina and her loyal trustworthy friends, just leave the corupt UN , and form their own UN ,
the UN of the Americas,
consisting all the south American nations that fully support argentina.
what say you.
We would not have to listen to CFK moaning all the time.
I'll say this again in case you missed it
Argentine defence minister Puricelli stated the only thing stopping Argentina from taking over the Falklands was the presence of the British garrison. So we'll practice the defence of OUR islands all we like and you can whinge till the cows come home, give it up FFS
Ok, we give it up. And we still leave the UN and the OAS.
Sounds familiar. Tell me again, these negotiations Argentina is constantly bleating about over the sovereignty of the Falklands...what is Argentina offering exactly?
Oh right nothing. You'd get what you want and we'd get what you want. How about no?
www.un.org/en/sc/documents/resolutions/2012.shtml
#60 You want to withdraw.......are you a country now errrrr, giorgio (hehehehehe)
History shows Argentines are already pretty good at political repression and mass-murder of their own people, all you need now is a massive program of collectivist farming and forced labour and the rest of the world can have a good laugh at your expense.
It's not too far off now, surely.
This is exactly why I want to withdraw. You Euros, Brits, and Northamers are so far up each others and your own caliginous abysses, you think Argentina or any other country withdrawing would be some sort of death wish.
We don't like you, we don't want to be associated with any corrupt entity you are a member of, you are immoral people have always been will ever be.
Now pay the 38 trillion to Africa, India, the Aborigenes and the Northamer natives in reparations.
Why don't you do it then? Just get on with it. In fact what are you doing on here bandying words with us 'immoral people', boring us to death with the same hate- filled drivel under ten different names? Go away and lobby your government to withdraw from the UN
If you can't see that political and economic isolation is basically slitting the throats of half your population, that's not our fault.
If you cut yourselves off from the political bodies you also break a lot of trade agreements with various parties. Best case scenario there is that it hastens Arg's rapid descent towards ANOTHER bankruptcy, worst case is Arg ends up without access to some pretty vital imports. Good luck maintaining a population of 40 million when you can't import modern farm equipment/fertiliser/pesticide.
Famine and millions of your people starving to death follows. Not our problem, unfortunately for you...
How is the fever?
I recommend you rest until the malevolent spirits have been fully exorcised.
If you over heat Giorgio will will follow Elio, Arifu, TTT, tobias....
Ezigbo ubosi.
Does it look like I care about the Falklands or negotiations about it? I simply want to withdraw from the UN and the OAS. Everything we can do to iconoclast the better.
Why do you make this sound like you're threatening us to withdraw ??
Do you believe that it is to our benefit to have you??
Please go - with your current government, you are not wanted.
@40 Why? Based on your approach, there will soon be around 42 million fewer Spanish speakers in the world! And based on my approach, there could soon be 89 million fewer Spanish speakers!
@42 Now we know why you don't like it!
@44 Correct. Argieland lowers the tone of anything.
@47 You've PAID for something? I don't believe it. Proof?
@50 How can you have a mindset? Doesn't that require a mind?
@53 The we can bomb and missile you into extinction and no-one would care.
@60 So f*** off. No-one will care. But then WE can do what WE like with you. The place that used to be called argieland. The new nuclear testing range. With moving targets. But not for long!
@64 You're sure you're proud of being a faggot?
@65 Of course it's a death wish. We wish for your death(s). As per Monty's suggestion, go and lobby your government to withdraw from everything. Also, please withdraw from the world. Options? You could build a 50-foot high wall round your territory complete with 2-mile wide minefields on the inside. Because you're good at mines. Or we could blow you off the face of the planet and turn what used to be argieland into a boating lake. You choose.
Heh, this coming from a country that virtually irradicated its native population. Sure UK has plenty of black stains in its history, most countries have, but I can't think of a time that they attempted Genocide.
Oct 18th, 2012 - 03:48 pm
What credibility???????????
Elaine, yes then can make a reason point now and then, however it's like smoke in that it can never seem to remain intact. I will only say these of the peronist argentines, because not all argentines are peronist. They seem to hold onto that old adage that the squeeky wheel gets the oil. I don't think they were ever taught or learned that it does not carry over to international diplomacy and politics. Since I'm on to old adages, they really need to learn that you get more bees withy honey. There is a time and place to be tough and agressive, but argentina has yet to have justification for it. They should have just accepted the fact that not everyone was going to accept a renegotiated debt and pay what they can as they can, rather then saying, oh well, nothing for you then. It is like every morning they wake, they tie their showlaces together and can never seem to figure out why they can't walk without tripping.
use male ñame instéad of woman.
the women can not discúss and nevér have discérñment at these stories.
At the risk of sounding like a stuck recording, I blame nationalism for the lack of being able to look at any topic objectively.
What a pure and moral country Argentina is.....but by all means Giorgio_O._Tsoukalos, keep telling us that Britain is evil....
My favourite is definitely Sussie though. Which mental illness(s) she suffers from is of great curiosity to me, and her fascination with royal nudity and use of it to reinforce her points is a subject of study all of it's own.
Still, never a dull moment.
1st place - Argentina 182 votes of 193 countries in the UN = 94.3% favorability
2nd place - Rwanda 154 votes of 193 countries in the UN = 79.8% favorability
3rd place - Australia 140 votes of 193 countries in the UN = 72.5% favorability
etc..
What exactly the Security Council will do and focus their job for the next years ? Here are some interesting points:
1- The Council takes the lead in determining the existence of a threat to the peace or act of aggression...
(key thought= militarization of the South Atlantic by UK and a threat to UNASUR members)
2- SC calls upon the parties to a dispute to settle it by peaceful means and recommends methods of adjustment or terms of settlement..
(Key thought= UK MUST MANDATORY obey UN Resolution about Malvinas and negotiate with Argentina)
3- SC in some cases, it can resort to imposing sanctions or even authorize the use of force to maintain or restore international peace and security.
(Key thought= UK could receive sanctions if continue this crazy and evil behaviour and refuse to obey the resolutions)
4- āThe Council also recommends to the General Assembly the appointment of the Secretary-...., together with the General Assembly, it elects the judges of the International Court of Justice (ICJ).ā
(Key thought= UK not respecting international comunity that only worry for search peace and global security, then ICJ could against UK for not living up to their responsibilities and really bad example to other nations in the world.
Conclusion = UK have all for lose (even his status and veto) and nothing to win if continue this madness attitude.
really hard times ahead.
www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=43320&Cr=Security+Council&Cr1=#.UIA_Qm83vTo
absolutely hilarious ;-)
----
Have to agree with *insert todays name hereā with regards to the UN though: its a completely amoral, self-serving stain upon the good name of humanity...
ah, yeah, OK, got a bit carried away there..
OK its just amoral and self-serving...
and expensive.
and worthless.
and a joke.
oh, and toothless.
and two-faced.
and has little committees of people who retain their committee status far past any reasonable use, just so that they can draw extra expenses and feel important.. all 24 of them...
other than that.. oh and hypocrites....
its a wonderful organisation...
(not)
Here's my conclusion. Extra terrestials should not be allowed on this site. You clearly do not live on the same planet as the rest of us.
Argentina being a member of the UN SC is probably going to be somewhat entertaining, vintage TinPotMan performances in the offing.
Publicity for their cause the Islanders probably could not achieve by themselves.
@65 Giorgio_O._Tsoukalos
And what are your proposals for reparations and restitution of land for the Southamer natives?
Still living under the yoke of an alien, implanted population.
@ 94 so_far
Just not in the real world.
whát is your forécast ábout how mañy slaúghtered chickén in Greece this yéar ?
don^t add yourself ínto this flock pléase !
do you know the phrasé meaning of slaúghtered chickén used in Greece?
m.youtube.com/?reload=3&rdm=mc3dk82gc#/watch?feature=plpp&v=J3SU9qUAkSg
1st place - Argentina 182 votes of 193 countries in the UN = 94.3% favorability
2nd place - Rwanda 154 votes of 193 countries in the UN = 79.8% favorability
Both Argentina and Rwanda ran unopposed so I find it amusing you would appear to feel these results prove anything.
You are wrong...the islands belong to Argentina!
I frame you up!
I am an Argentine spy!
lol
añ Argentine spy who márried with Conquérer & Captain Pôppy
So lets get this straight.... If the UK defend the Falklands, and pose NO danger to Argentina, this is a threat to peace in South America? and thus would warrant the use of force to maintain or restore international peace and security?.
In fact the UK military are there to maintain peace so you idiots don't try another invasion.
The only words of aggression ever to come about, in all this ridiculous bogus claim you have for the Falklands, have come from CFK and her totally lunatic, and demented cabinet.
You are a deluded individual and the UN will not fight your corner.
In fact hard times for Argentina
Lets see how this plays out.
Argentina; I demand, this, that and the other
UK; Whatever, we don't care what you think or demand you bunch of cretinous cowards...
The rest of the world; Oh the crazies in Argentina are complaining again.... who cares? We dont!
And so on.....
Psst she's not
Gonna be a great Xmas in Argentina..
38 trillion. Better start soon.
- - -
@75
With the current government, or any government. Out of the UN, and out of the OAS. Enough of these racist Europans, Canadians, Americans, and the rest. Leave the Falklands alone to trade with whom they wish, except Argentina and its ports.
I would go as far as closing foreign embassies in Argentina, but I'll settle for the above.
You know what? I think that there are 6Bn people worldwide who don't give a sh*t what laughing boy Timerman says. There are 3,000 people next door to him and I KNOW they never have and never will give a flying f**k about what ol' baldy says.
And so the Argentinian's throw another hissy fit. Big deal..... Here's Tom with the weather.................
Mind you, when he gets home I'm sure that the new minister for culture will throw him a free sympathy f**k just to soothe his nerves.
Honestly, you couldn't make this up..........
caliginous abysses, iconoclast
I simply want to withdraw from the UN and the OAS., leave the UN. It is shameful we belong to that organization.
remove the slime of being associated with an organization which has your country as a member
Truth_Telling_MickeyMouse aka Giorgio_O._Tsoukalos aka Arifu_Gobakuwi aka Tobias - all from the Mendoza province.
TTM(T)/A_G/G_O_T/Toby_el_Menduco: What is the origin of the word colony?
Keep woolgathering Nabiru landscapes.
Argentina seems to have forgotten that they're supposed to be representing South American and Caribbean countries, not just themselves.
I wonder if there is a revolution in Argentina whether they will still be eligible to hold the SC seat, or will a new representative have to be nominated.
I guess it's good-bye UK from the SecCo. Surely it will the perfect excuse to put Germany in there, and maybe add India.
the cracks are already showing,
and the protests get bigger.
Argentina will be out by 2015 - guaranteed !
1500 dollars.
Is so sad they dont even imagine what is going on soon......millons of pakis, hindues and muslims around london already are making plans for the remains of the city....payback time.
Yeaaahhhh! I love it. I can't wait to see the last of the empire tumbling down. And the Argies will give them a helping hand.
Albert Einstein said that the definition of madness was repeating the same action over and over again but expecting a different outcome............... I guess laughing boy Timerman proves the point.
128 so_far
You ticked all the boxes haven't you? deluded, out of touch with reality and a racist as well?
Meanwhile in the real world...............
Well we might have to go out & get ourselves a new Empire.
Argentina would be a good start.
Deport you all back to Spain & ltaly, then restock with worthy immigrants.
l'm sure that we could cut a deal with the native Amerindians(those that are left, the ones you missed).
They dress them up as nuns and throw them out of a c130 to see if they fly.......boom boom :o)
We have a cunning plan. Cartoons and videos insulting the Prophet will be released with Argentina being the source. Anti Muslim posters on here will be implicated.
The Muslim population in the UK will be outraged and call for a Holy War against the unbelievers. We will say go get them
mind you,
you lot hate jews , catholics , british americans Europeans Africans, arabs , pickies indians , chinks , jesites mormons , jovas witness,
oh and polar bears.
is their any one you dont hate.
And the Argies will give them a helping hand.
How?
Have Argentina developed a long range, guided fart?
You say: .....the UN will not fight your corner.
I´ll give some facts, try to understand the real situation.
1- UN General Assambly already side with Argentina about Malvinas Issue and MADE > 10 strong Resolution until 1988 supporting Argentinean position to negotiate in peace the sovereignty of the islands. (NO ONE WORD ABOUT SELF DETERMINATION FOR THIS CASE FOR THE ALIEN ILEGAL PEOPLE LIVING IN USURPED TERRITORIES)
so, well job done by Argentina
2- UN c-24 Main Body Descolonization Comittee strong side and support Argentinean position and MADE > 20 resolutions supporting talks of negotiation without delay about sovereignty of the islands. (NO ONE WORD ABOUT SELF DETERMINATION FOR THIS CASE FOR THE ALIEN ILEGAL PEOPLE LIVING IN USURPED TERRITORIES)
so, well job done by Argentina again.
3. UN Security Council Main Body.....Argentina right now is working on it...please read this very article and try to undersntad the situation.
4- UN ICJ ----Next step.
Argentina is preparing the snacks for the party....be patient.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 01:53 p
ā (NO ONE WORD ABOUT SELF DETERMINATION FOR THIS CASE FOR THE ALIEN ILEGAL PEOPLE LIVING IN USURPED TERRITORIES)
Self determination is the bedrock of the UN Charter, NO UN resolution ever mentions it, it automatcally forms part of every resolution.
4- UN ICJ ----Next step.ā
If you believe this, you'll beliebe anything, the last thing CFK's government wants is to win the Falklands claim, it needs it to keep on blowing smoke in our eyes so that we don't realize that we are sliding into hyperinflation and bankrupcy!!!!!!!!
The UNSC is charged with the maintenance of international peace and security. It includes include the establishment of peacekeeping operations, the establishment of international sanctions for warring nations, and the authorization of military action.
I think for those that think the Argentines will be bringing the Falklands up in the UNSC will get slapped with a hard does of the real world, like when the Libertad left Argentina.
There is no war, unless cuntina plans on making one.
..........................................
Prove it,
Show us a copy of this resolutions that states that Great Britain must negotiate the sovereignty of the Falklands, please.
UN support sellf determination when and where apply......
There ARE many resolutions that call for this right but......when apply.
Just look this example of Lebanon people...they DO have the self-determination right.
www.unwatch.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=bdKKISNqEmG&b=1313923&ct=1748013
The very mission of C-24 :
The Special Committee annually reviews the list of Territories to which the Declaration is applicable and makes recommendations as to its implementation...
CONCLUSION= ALIEN ILEGAL INAHBITANTS OF USURPED TERRITORIES DONT HAVE SELF-DETERMINATION RIGHT.....i dont say that...UN SAY IT.
pd. why you think their ilegal falg say Disire the right ??
BECAUSE ACTUALLY THEY DONT HAVE IT AND NEVER EVER EVER EVER WILL HAVE.
THEYÁRE ONLY SQUATTING ARGENTIENAN LAND BY MILITAR FORCE AND OUTLAW.
FACT
You say :
Prove it, Show us a copy of this resolutions that states that Great Britain must negotiate the sovereignty of the Falklands, please.
Here you have ....advice, please try to study a bit rather to post silly things all the time buddy.
www.falklands.info/history/resolution4325.html
There is no mention of sovereignty in your link, not one word.
There is no mention of the UN siding with Argentina.
There is no mention of usurped territories
So Far, my English must be very poor, PLEASE point out the part whe the UN already sides with argentina ??????
Complaint number whatever launched - lets see the status quo change hey......................or perhaps not.
You're buffoon of a foreign minister is simply restating the same tired old half truths, fudging and hysteria.
Has he tried to claim that we are basing nuclear weapons there again? or is he gtrying to ratchet up tensions by squealing about tests of the air defence systems?
I mean you must be terrified of Rapier, with it's 6.8KM range. Let's face it the only way it will ever down one of your planes is if they are already over the Falklands...................
You'd love the place to be undefended - so you could attack without meeting resistance then either force the falklanders out of their homes at gunpoint or force them to live under occupation.
That's what your claim means, a claim that is based on some rather fuzzy logic.
Go to the ICJ if you want - let's see you justify annexing somebody else's homeland over a 180+ year old disputed claim, where the other side has a stronger argument to possession...............
Look at
@147( Excuse plagiarism).
There is no mention of sovereignty in your link, not one word.
There is no mention of the UN siding with Argentina.
There is no mention of “usurped territories”
And so far, look at:
@148 (Excuse plagiarism).
PLEASE point out the part where the UN “already sides with argentina” ??????
Over to you, so far, like most actions by the Argentine government (ie unpaid debts, a failed invasion of the Falkland Islands), you don't finish the job.
You Malvanistas are a gift to us pro-Falkland Island posters as you never totally conclude your arguments but leave them hanging in the air-otherwise we would not be able to post.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 02:41 pm
ā1. Requests the Governments of Argentina and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to initiate negotiations with a view to finding the means to resolve peacefully and definitively the problems pending between both countries, including all aspects on the future of the Falkland Islands (Malvinas), in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations;
2. Requests the Secretary-General to continue his renewed mission of good offices in order to assist the parties in complying with the request made in paragraph 1 above, and to take the necessary measures to that end:
3. Requests the Secretary-General to submit to the General Assembly at its forty-fourth session a report on the progress made in the implementation of the present resolution;
4. Decides to include in the provisional agenda of its forty-fourth session the item entitled āQuestion of the Falkland Islands (Malvinas).
In the above, which is pasted from your link, the UN REQUESTS, it does not demand, or order, it requests the two countries to resolve their differences by negotiation. That is all, it is a NON BINDING resolution which either or both countries may comply with or not.
A BINDING resolution of the UN, which we did NOT comply with was Security Council Resolution 502, and with which we are STILL NOT IN COMPLIANCE, so we are delinquent and the UK is not!!!!!!!
I am confused as to how your nation can hold claim to these islands. For starters the Falklands were marked, claimed, and inhabited by Great Britain way before your criminals usurped the islands, and politely asked to leave in 1833. So the Islands were British before you even set foot on them.
The Islands never were yours, and never will be so stop being a thieving pikey gypsy, and give up with your pipe dreams. You can but hope, and your threats that the UN will fight your corner is water off a ducks back, much like your insults, but the Islands have been in British hands for near 200 years now and I don’t see the UN invading them for the sake of Argentina’s greed.
I hope the UK up their military presence so that when you invade they can promptly send you back home from where you came.
@94 Election of a war-mongering ignorer of UNSC resolutions. Election of faggots that ignore UN Charter. Election of genocides. Thoughts: No GA resolutions are binding. SC resolutions are binding on all members. Note: Argieland has failed to comply with a binding resolution. By failing to comply and continuing its illegitimate actions, argieland is a war criminal. There are 42 million war criminals in argieland.
@103 In order to provide a solution and maintain compliance with the NPT, exterminate all argies. Problem solved!
@107 Proper treatment for spies. Execution. Bullet through balls. 6 hours later, bullet through brain.
@113 Let's just explode and irradiate argieland. No survivors!
@118 Keep that dildo working in your ass!
@120 Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah. The dreams of a colonialist, dictatorial, imperialist, tyrannical, butt-bending faggot.
@122 Let's make it worthwhile. I'll bet 500 billion dollars. You bet the lives of every argie, man, woman or child wherever they might be. Deal?
@128 You need to understand reality. The ethnic population of the UK amounts to around 8%. That's a little under 5 million. Much the same goes for the Scots. The Scots can f*** off anytime. They won't be missed. Their ideas of what they are going to get out of a break-up are a million miles from reality. as far as the ethnics are concerned, they get a choice. They can be British. They can leave. They can be dead. Simple.
@139 Listen up, fart for brain. There isn't a single UN GA resolution that is binding. UN C-24 is no longer recognised by the UK. The wankers of argieland are prohibited from discussions, votes where there is a national interest.
@144 Lying wanker. Any UN resolution must comply with the UN Charter. self-determination is guaranteed by the UN Charter. Argieland - get f**ked!
Yes so_far is talking bollocks. The UNSC would have to approve any military intervention and it would be immediately voted down by the US, France, the UK, Russia and China. Not only that but the UN has no grounds to fight anyone's wars, which is why they always have to rely on organisations like NATO, which are not going to attack one of their own members, or other member states which are not going to attack the UK.
Basically so_far realises that Argentina's armed forces are useless, so he's pathetically wants other countries to fight Argentina's wars for them.
So_far is a deluded fool. The UN recognises the de facto British sovereignty over the islands and always has.
The UK have stated that they can't talk to Argentina unless the Islanders want them to, and the Argentines have ignored an invitation from the FIG to do just that.
So even if Argentina broached the subject to the UNSC they would be laughed at, as the UK is the reasonable one here.
The most they will do is suggest that all parties sit down and talk, or take it to the ICJ.
UNASUR!!!! ROFLMFAO!!!
Tell me, so_far, just why would the other nations of South America fight for Argentina?
Is Argentina so weak that it needs others to fight their battles for you? I'm sure you fellow South American countries snigger at how pathetic you sound.
But let's for a moment imagine that all your dreams come true and you somehow persuade the other countries in UNASUR fight for you.
The British can the invoke Article 5 of the NATO charter and UNASUR would be facing NATO.
Not only that but it would be the UNSC putting sanctions against UNASUR for an unprovoked attack.
You haven't really thought it through, have you?
Go back to the drawing board.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 05:14 pm
Change your doctor or your drug dealer, one of them is giving you the wrong stuff!!
No Latin American government is eagerly awaiting any UK destructor as dauntless or whatever, commits a small mistake in the South Atlantic and give reason for intervention to UNASUR
No Latin American armed forces have the capacity to wage war on the UK by itself, and certainly not to wage war on NATO.
No one is going to attack the Brits for us, and we aren't going to do it on our own, so don't be a pelotudo!!!!!!!!!
The thing you don't realize is that the UN is for developing countries, 3rd world countries and undeveloped countires like argentina. the UNSC does not hold weight with permenent members unless the permenent members wish to adhere and there is nothing any country in the world can do about it when it comes to the 5 permanent members, history proves that. I think you need to crawl back to to treehous in the jungle.
ugh? sorry about the previous comments...
the islands belongs to Argentina
I am missing TTT comments....
Please, TTT come back....
please,
we all miss you so much!
No the islands belong to the Falkland islanders and have for longer than the Republic of Argentina had existed.
To clarify matters:
Falkland Islands community - started out as Vernet's colony setting up shop around 1826/7/8.
The Republic if Argentina - came into existence on 1853.
This is just one of the facts which is why Argentina won't take this dispute to the International Court of Justice. That reason is that you do not have, nor have you ever had, a valid sovereignty claim to the Falklands Islands.
Not by 19th century law, not by 20th century law, not by 21st century law. Or even 18th century law which is when Britain claimed sovereignty.
The sooner you grow up and accept this simple fact the sooner you can all move on with your lives and make Argentina a better country to live in.
the 3,000 retards don't know what to do with the islands....take a look...there is nothing there.....poverty poverty poverty
lol
Those 3,000 people are better off financially than most Argentinians. Soon they will be better off financially than all Argentinians.
Is that why you're so jealous? Jealous because they have a future while people like you are mired in the past?
For all your crying to the UN you know deep down inside that Argentina will never get the Falklands.
You also know deep down that Argentina will never achieve its full potential until it buries the past and looks towards the future.
But all of your problems are self inflicted, accept that and look to the future where Argentina's resources are used to help all of its citizens and not just to line the pockets of a few.
the 3,000 retards don't know what to do with the islands....take a look...there is nothing there.....poverty poverty poverty
lol
You sound like that man from Vegas, Sussie!
Sussie:
Can you find a decent hotel in the islands? the answer is NO.
Can you find a decent restaurant in the islands: the answer is NO
Can you find a community college in the islands? The answer is NO
Can you find an apartment building in the islands: The answer is NO
Sussie - change your name as often as you like - you are the stupidest troll on here.
Even BK is embarrassed by you and apologises to UK Team :-(
LOL
TTT is a lodestar to Nibiru, athwart the heavens he looks upon us, sending disciples like Arifu and Elio.
Sometimes one does not need the Gods to guide us, the Brits themselves make fools of themselves jactitating about their supposed importance to the planet. Its so sad to watch so an abased display of insecurity.
Hypocrites!
Doesn't Argentina embargo air and sea travel to the Islands and try to encourage other south american countries to do the same?
Yes, you are right.
Link below: story of Argie warship on 'exercises' in South Atlantic with several other ships of other LATAM nations.
en.mercopress.com/2012/10/20/second-argentine-navy-vessel-retained-in-africa
I bet Singer has got his lawyers on it already. ;o)
Sounds like a description of winghing Argentines to me.
I see that they are off to the UN with another complaint, this time about their naval vessel impounded in GHana due unpaid debts. The UN, with all its real problems (like Syria and Gaza etc) must be sick and tired of Argentina lodging complaints about problems of her own making.
They will have to create a special Argentina frivolous complaints section to cope with the paperwork! And this is what we pay our UN subscriptions for!
I wonder how much money Argentina gives the UN?
About as much as she gives to the so called 'Vulture Funds' but given the present situation with Ghana and the ship, she might have to pay in kind.
They shouldn't create a specialist section. They should just all laugh at the Rgentine representative, and kep doing do until they get the message.
If that doesn't work they should be told to STFU, and if they continue to abuse their position on the Security Council they should be suspended. However, maybe if everyone ignores them they'll just go away.
Lets all hope that they do have to pay in kind and lose the ship. Iits time they got (another) dose of the real world.
They weren’t deriding their creditors as 'vulture funds' when they first borrowed the money. Its countries like Argentina who refuse to meet their financial obligations who are continuing to drag the world economy down.
Exactly!
September's South Georgia News and Events can now be viewed and featured this month:
- Who Visits, How Many?
- Marine Protected Area; More Protection Coming
- Krill and Marathons - GSGSSI Visit To Norway
- Fishing And Shipping News
- Preparing For The Aerial Assault
- Bird Island Gets Lots Of New Place Names
- The Ice Project – Search For Endurance And Feature Film
- Wild Trip Of A Lifetime
- End Of The Mooring Line For HMS Plymouth?
- Bird Island Diary – Gentoo Breaks The Egg Record
- Alps To Antarctica
- South Georgia Snippets
- Dates for Your Diary
www.sgisland.gs/index.php/%28h%29South_Georgia_Newsletter%2C_September_2012
www.sgisland.gs
Been away to the UN for days.
Anyway reply, to your reply, to my reply, to your fiction.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
You said
Please try to study a bit rather to post silly things all the time buddy.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Well this silly expertly examined your evidence,
And it does not mention sovereignty once,
It does not mention the UN resolutions,
You in fact it is once again, CFK indoctrinated useless information, given to you, to give to us , by your bosses , to try undermine us,
But it has failed to work.
Again.
Mo du, my friend , mon du,,,,
.
What garuntees would you give to the world if Britain withdrew it's protection force from the Falklands that you would not at some point in the near future asert your eligal control over us.
That is the main reason we Falkland Islanders welcome th epressence of the British Forces on the Islands.
We know how devious the Argentine Government is and having experianced what they did to us in 1982 we prefer to have the British Forces on our soil than those nasty aggressive Argentines who back in 1982 changed everything about our way of life even though they promised they would not.
We can never trust your Government again ever so get used to it the British pressence will remain as long as it takes to defend our homeland from your dictators.
#180 European colonialism....... Why just European colonialism?
I would have thought that ALL colonialism should be of concern to all. By its belligerent actions, Argentina is attempting to go back several hundred years and colonize the Falkland Islands against the oft stated wishes of the inhabitants. This should be of equal concern to all South American countries, or do different standards apply in that part of the hemisphere?
.
Ever since the various American revolutions all American countries have followed a policy of opposing Old World colonialism in the New World.
Ah! l see the problem. A misunderstanding.
You Argentines actually think that the Falklands belong to you?
Sorry to disillusion you but the fact is, the Falklands are not yours.
Never have been & never will be.
Just go away & try to colonize someone else.
Thank you.
Fine, then let the Falklands have self determination and be free of the yoke of the UK and any other colonial power such as Argentina.
That should satisfy your decolonisation committee.
Of course,another way would be for the successors to the Old World colonialists to return to their ancestral homes and return the lands to the aboriginal populations.
This would leave the Falkland Islanders as the sole occupants of their homeland as there was no indigenous population on the islands
Don't bother with 1833 etc etc - you have done that nonsense to death !
I do not understand why this issue excites you so. The outcome is inevitable. Within 25 years Las Malvinas will be returned to Argentina.
You can't 'reintegrate' territory what was not integrated in the first place. Despite what some Argentines might believe, the Falkland Islands have never been part of the Argentine.
During their history, countries in the western hemisphere (or new world) have also indulged in colonialism (the US involvement in the Phillipines is but one example). So, folowing your argument, old world colonliasm is bad yet new world colonialism is good? Like I said, double standards are being applied here.
By the way, if the Argentine government thinks that it can speak for all the Americas on this issue it is dreaming!
The government of Argentina is not speaking for any other American country. Almost all of America has adopted a policy of opposing Old World colonialism country by country. This is not new. These policies have been held for almost 2 centuries. This is why most American countries support the return of Las Malvinas.
25 years nothing....you dingbats need to realize Falklands are not yours. almost two hundred years of crying and ass whippings and you still do not get it. This is a stretch......but grow up already and move on
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!