UK expects Uruguay to respect the Falklands’ referendum, which is a three sided event
British ambassador in Uruguay Ben Lyster-Binns said the coming referendum in the Falkland Islands involves the people of the Islands, United Kingdom and Argentina and expects the Uruguayan government to respect the referendum even when Foreign Minister Luis Almagro anticipated that the country will not recognize the results of the ballot.
“It will be a very significant event in which the people of the Falklands will make their voice heard worldwide, regarding their political status and future, and we want that decision to be respected”, said Ambassador Lyster-Binns in an interview published in the Sunday edition of Uruguay’s leading newspaper, El Pais.
He added it is an issue that involves three sides, the people of the Falklands, the British government and the Argentine government and “the collective discussion between all sides is the logic way to being understanding the different points of view and interests which is in other words talking to each other”.
The British ambassador explained that is why Foreign Secretary William Hague invited his Argentine counterpart Minister Hector Timerman during his visit to London to also meet with representatives from the Falklands’ government, which “regrettably Timerman did not accept. We are willing to discuss the issue with Argentina at any moment, always with the participation of members from the Falklands elected government since we are talking about the future”.
On March10/11 the people of the Falklands will reply to the following question: Do you wish the Falkland Islands to retain their current political status as an Overseas Territory of the United Kingdom? YES or NO”
“The voice of the Falklands’ people deserves to be heard”, said the British ambassador who paraphrasing Foreign Secretary Hague indicated that the Falklands have become a thriving democracy with a growing economy and through nine generations the people of the Falklands have worked tirelessly to establish their position in the world. “This will be a chance for the people of the Falkland Islands to express their views about how they wish to be governed, and in a democratic and incontestable way without other people speaking for them and for this they have the British Government’s full support”.
Lyster-Binns said that the right to self determination is guaranteed by the UN charter and praised Uruguay for its commitment to human rights, acknowledged internationally, for its abidance with the rule of law and International law, keeping to the rules of the game and a country where democracy “is one of the most precious values”.
When asked about Uruguay’s sponsorship at a Mercosur summit to bar all vessels with the Falklands’ flag from entering the group’s ports, the British ambassador said that all vessels heading for the Falklands are welcome in all Uruguayan ports as long as they fly the red ensign. “In fact it was President Jose Mujica who said he did not like to isolate people or interrupt trade”.
Finally Ambassador Lyster-Binns announced that a business delegation from the Falklands’ Development Corporation will be visiting Uruguay to explore alternatives to increase bilateral trade.
Suggested Stories
-
May 23rd 2013
Cristina Fernandez administration limits overseas dollar extractions to a minimum
-
May 23rd 2013
Falkland Islands wish for normal neighborly relations with all South American neighbors
-
May 21st 2013
Falkland Islands: it’s a three-side debate; Argentina must recognize Islanders right to decide their future
-
May 20th 2013
Falkland Islands: Argentina blasts UK’s ‘double standard’ on self determination right
111 comments Feed
Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.
haaa, haaa Piratesss go with the referendum to scotland!!!
Gnashing of teeth by the looks of the above comments.
Some evidence that the UN doesn't consider the questions or the future result of this referendum valid?
Is this like when you Malvinist's claimed the UK had broken UN resolutions? Then the UN General Secretary, Ban Ki-Moon, said we haven't ever broken any.
Is this like when you say the UN doesn't recognise that the Falkland Islanders are people, and therefore have no right to self-determination? Then the UN General Secretary, Ban Ki-Moon, says that they are 'people' and have the right to self-determination. Not only that, but all those defunct UNGA resolutions you like spouting, ALL said the that the wishes of the Islanders (self-determination) have to be taken into account during any sovereignty talks.
Your foreign minister, Mr Timerman, has shown the world the reason Argentina shouldn't get their hands on the Islands. Everything he said was for consumption by gullible people like you. The International Community looked on with a mixture of amusement at his amateurish antics, and horror as he casually disregarded human rights, because they are inconvenient for Argentina's position.
And what did he actually achieve? He can back with a paper signed by 'the undersigned', but no actual signatures on it! His so-called group of 18 REFUSED to actually sign his ridiculous document, and they were 'no-doubt' hand-picked sichophants from a few countries. But NOT one of them was 'anybody' from a foreign government, NOT one of them represented the EU or the UN. So basically you had a group of no-bodies, and even the no-bodies, wouldn't sign Timerman's silly document.
His antics have completely destroyed Argentina's credibility diplomatically and politically. Your government has destroyed Argentina's credibility economically.
And yet despite all their rhetoric, the Falklands remain under the control of the Falklanders, and under the protection of the UK. The March referendum will show the world what the Islanders want.
Argentina's wants are irrelevant.
What are you doing on here???
You must have been first one in the pool!!!
Just couldn't wait to slag the Brits and 'muddy' the waters, could you??!!
Hey, remember this?
” (dispute I do not support my country pursuing). The islands should remain as they wish to be”
Now here you are!
Just like to hear yourself pontificate, don't you?
That's a rhetorical question only, not really wanting to hear the wriggling, squirming, rationalising, or moralising that I know will piddle forth.
Post 2; is a bunch of unsubstantiated nonsense. The UN never said any of those things.
It seems this referendum is hitting hard with its results killing any argument Argentina may have had.
Maybe the hysteria we are seeing around this is reality setting in for those who have been propagating the Malvinas lie.
Timermans smoke & mirrors stunt convinced no one, except perhaps some of the home audience.
english.ruvr.ru/2013_02_08/New-outbreak-of-Falkland-Islands-Malvinas-war/
@6 I did wonder. He does seem to have lost it.
[1] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokelauan_self-determination_referendum,_2006
Your disdain for your neighbours isn't limited to those of British descent, then?
I see the words, “We want that decision to be respected.” The word “ expects” has connations similar the Argentine favourite word “demands.” I do not think that this what the Ambassador said, or indeed meant. Perhaps it is the papers word rather than the Ambassadors.
I might be nit picking, but the Argentine would only jump on it to accuse us of colonial and imperial arrogance.
I bet you do not get a sensible answer to that.
Still only 26 more days and we will find out.
I am sure they will vote yes, they are going to be VERY,VERY RICH in a few years time
The important thing is sovereignty. If Argentina believes the Falklands is theirs take your case to the International Court of Justice. You don't dare do it, do you because you have no case whatever? Furthermore, the population of the Falklands, some of whom can trace their ancestry back to before 1833, don't want Argentinean rule.
They don't want to be a pariah nation under warning by the IMF, they don't want the influence of Chavez, Castro and Iran, they don't want corrupt politicians and police, they don't want 30% inflation, they don't want a fast depreciating currency, they dont want to live on $7 a day, they don't want Argentinas Mafia, they want to be able to walk out after dark without the threat of being raped mugged or murdered, they don't want a society where you have to have iron bars on your windows to keep out theives, they don't want any guns like you see as a 'must have' and they don't want Latin Alien Culture. And, in the referendum in March they will vote for what they want to retain, their association with Britain.
They do want to retain the British culture, the quiet village atmosphere of the their towns and villages, they do want their own independent government, they do want the friendship and protection of a powerful friendly nation, they do want no crime fraud or guns on the street, they do want wildlife and fisheries carefully and intelligently managed, they do want controlled tourism, they do want to retain their British heritage, the British education of their children and they also want peaceful and friendly relations with their neighbours. This last desire is constantly frustrated by the aggressive and vocal actions of Argentina who they do not like or trust.
Great article, but unfortunely a waste of time because the Trolls on here do not understand logic.
They understand that in 26 days their little game is up. What on earth are we going to argue about in the future?
When the UN refers the the Falklands as the malvinas (Falklands) they will support Rgentina . But the UN officially refers to the Falkland Islands as the Falklands (malvinas) because they support the UK and Falklanders. Remember all you malvinista's, malvina's are in parenthesis for PC reasons and nothing else otherwise malvina's would not even be they. One of these days the British are going to get so pissed off at your bullshit and slap you rg's down for all your feet stomping. In fact the world is getting near that point as well, less Syria, Iran and N. Korea.
You young lady are really something else. Trying to comprehend your inellect, is like pioneering a whole new branch of psychology and proof positive, that education is not necessary a true indicator of intelligence.
Firstly, you put a post on here accusing the British of making war on you in 1805, 1807, 1826 qnd 1854. Invading you four times. I point out you have distorted the truth, a polite way of saying you lied, that in fact the war of 1826 was betwwen you and Brazil.
Then you make the ridiculous connection, that because the British supported, politically, the Brazilians, they have the same have status combatants against you. Ergo the British were at war with you. A fascinating concept, but one which does not seem to have been adopted under international law.
Now and this really is the best bit. Now, because the British did not actually ally themselves in combat with the Brazilians against you, you accuse them of cowardice! I can hardly type for laughing
If you are a true representation of the inelligence of your nation, there is little wonder they produce diplomats of the calibre of Mr Timermann.
What's more, even further evidence why the Falkland Islanders are absolutely correct in not wanting any form of governance by you.
The referendum is just for domestic consumption, doesn’t matter if the Islanders desire to become British, Chinese, Bolivians or part of Pakistan.
They are illegal occupants of Argentina territory and sponsored by a pirate corrupt nation like Britain and must be treated like that.
Argentina should sue Britain for 4 trillions of dollars in concept of reparation for economic damages.
And if they don’t pay as always they do Argentina should confiscate British assets & companies until full payment is issue.
UK should learn to respect western civilisation and that cannot be out of law.
Otherwise Unasur should send the Armies to make comply with the law.
The British let you off easy in 1982, they should have bombed your military into the ground until you (a) apologised and (b) paid reparations (including paying for the removal of the anti-personell mines you so nicely left).
Instead of just ranting about it on the web why don't you spend your time encouraging your government to implement your logical well thought out proposals?
its amazing how some people will believe anything they are told: the UN has never said anything like this, ever...its just been made-up by Timmidman.
“”“Otherwise Unasur should send the Armies to make comply with the law.”“””
haha... i very much doubt you will ever find Brazil or anybody else in South American to actually go to war for you... particularly not over the Falklands.
More Argie bullshit ! Actually it is very good pirate tactics. It's akin to late TV program called call my bluff.
1) Yes it does
2) No they are not
3) Argentina should pay the UK for reparations as a result of their brutal attempt to destroy the lives of the Islanders. Oh, I forgot, Argentina is not too good at repaying its debts Is there not some case being held in the USA about this very subject. Argentina, always the hypocrite ! You have good track record of thieving from foreign companies.
4) The UK 's record compared with Argentina is exemplary and Argentina has not yet qualified to join western civilization.
5) Argentina is so shit scared of Britain that it wants someone else to do the fighting. If Britain was attacked by UNASUR then we would have to go nuclear. Our first target Buenos Aires. But I don't think your chums would want to have anything to do with a nut case nation threatening war over a small island chain over which it has no claim.
They would all take a sharp step back and say it's your problem, deal with it.
If you want to sue then go to court and sue. If you want to contest sovereignty then go the ICJ and contest it. But why sit here complaining. You might just be one case away from getting what you want. Alternatively you have a few weeks left to convince the Falkland Islanders what great colonial masters you would be. If they believe you then you can get the islands that way instead. And yet here you are.
The Falklands timing couldn't be better and I think CFK and minions have lost all control and are rudderless.
What a lovely site.
rggentina need's to wake. The power's that be in the world are not going to continue feeling sorry for rgentina and look the other way because they have no military or national defense. Someone is going to do more than kick sand in little rgentina's face.
It is more and better than the Rgs have or could do!
Hahaha
I was watching the movie battleship with my RG friend and he commented that the Mighty Mo was way better than anything they have now! He is really embarrassed of the current state of the country.
Poor deluded Dany.
It's quite funny reading your rants, that have no place in actual reality.
Tell me, Dany, why should the rest of UNASUR fight for Argentina?
Are you saying that Argentina is SO WEAK that they need someone else to fight your battles for you? Pathetic.
But tell me, just what would you give the rest of UNASUR if they did fight your battles for you? The Falklands? A share in the oil?
Do you think that any of the other UNASUR countries would trust Argentina to keep to your side of the bargain once the fighting was done? I mean why would they believe Argentina? You have NEVER kept to a treaty in your history!
But let's imagine shall we, that UNASUR all join together to invade and steal the Falklands.
The UK, sends troops, and because sovereign British territory is in danger of being invaded, we involke Article 5 of the NATO charter as well as Article 15 of the UN Charter.
So instead of just facing the UK military, you are also facing the rest of NATO's military, and the Commonwealth, and the UNSC.
You see, Dany, by your statements you have confirmed two things:
1. Argentina hasn't got the military capability to fight its way out of a wet paper bag, let alone invade the Falklands.
2. Argentina is a coward because it doesn't have the guts for a one on one fight, like any bully you are only 'brave' when you are surrounded by your mates.
Just like you were 'brave' in 1982 when you sent 10,000 troops to subdue a population of 2,000 unarmed civilians and 70 armed Royal Marines.
Then a significant number of British troops turned up and your 'bravado' evapourated, rather than put up a proper fight.
Your troops surrendered to a smaller force, that on the whole had less advanced weaponry than Argentine troops, and that force had to travel thousands of miles. A battle that every military expert on the planet said the UK couldn't win. Yet somehow we did win.
Price Freezes
Hyperinflation
Devaluations
Unemployment
Depression
CFK must be in a panic
a drug addled
panic
“and kirchner shaking timmerman's balls in her other hand.”
Sorry to disagree, but just as Malvinas - they don't exist.
I hear Noble are quaking in their boots!
In case you're not familiar with Kirchner, this woman is a mafia-style criminal, a populist political hustler who has, for years, fabricated economic data to claim Argentina has low inflation. (In truth, the inflation rate there is over 25%.) She has been caught using government-created money to pay off political bribes. She has been slapped on the wrist by the IMF for falsifying economic data, and now she is about to thrust her country into nationwide food shortages that may very well be followed by riots.
The people of Argentina deserve better than Kirchner. Argentinians are, by and large, extremely friendly and capable people, yet they have suffered under the most absurd dictatorial rulers for at least a generation, possibly longer. Kirchner is just the latest in a long line of thuggish betrayers of the people who elected her.
“Cristina Kirchner's Argentina illustrates an alarming trend. Her government has expropriated major foreign investors, falsified statistics, destroyed central bank independence , used the nation's currency reserves for political payoffs, and faces default,” writes Paul Roderick Gregory at Forbes.com
Welcome to the land of populist governments led by charismatic people who have no clue whatever how economies work. These national leaders are a disgrace to humanity, and nations like Argentina would be far better served if they through Kirchner in prison rather than listening to any more of her delusional economic demands.
For starters, the price freeze means that food importers will halt most imports because they would lose money by selling their
If it's substantiated, it's (again) probably the worst thing a country can do when faced with spiralling inflation.
Once food importers can't import any more, they'll soon find that domestic producers don't want to sell in the rapidly deflating domestic market, preferring to export it.
So naturally CFK will have to pass more laws demanding that farmers satisfy domestic demand first, which will basically destroy argentina's trade surplus and eventually drive farms out of business, fueling further unemployment and adding an extra burden to the state's dwindling capital reserves necessitating even more inflationary measures and the whole sordid cycle begins again.
Welcome to being the new Zimbabwe...
Threats of legal action are an acquired strategy from their new best friend.
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2145866/Iran-threatens-sue-Google-omitting-Persian-Gulf-label-map-service.html#axzz2KZtYrbbi
www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/02/02/286842/iran-will-sue-spain-for-ban-on-media/
www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/jan/29/iran-threatens-sue-bp-pollution-oil
www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/01/31/286578/irgc-to-sue-us-over-spy-drone-flights/
www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/30/iran-bankmellat-eu-idUSL5N0AZEOB20130130
www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/15/iran-murdered-nuclear-scientists
english.ruvr.ru/2012_07_29/Iran-to-sue-US-EU-for-sanctions-damages/
The next step is to confiscate stored Soy and Corn based on a hoarding law and then expropriate the farms for being “unproductive”.
It's just a matter of time
wait for it
Hmmm.... subsidy bills... lost income
[1] www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/basics/inflat.htm
@2 Says who?
@17 What a moronic argtard you are. The referendum is for the “international community”. We shall see who respects the will of “the people” and democracy. Argieland won't. But then, it's not a democracy. Kicked your sorry arses before. Want us to do it again? I would recommend that we don't stop until there are at least 60,000 argie dead. What a funny comment from argie(we never pay our debts)land. Let's demand argieland pays its £10 billion reparations for the Falklands War. UK DOES respect western civilisation and law. Trouble is that your cesspit has neither. Oh, come on, unasur. Brazil, Uruguay, venezuela and argieland. Only got 423,000 “army” personnel. Britain has 260,000. No problem. Any British soldier is worth at least 20 latino surrender monkeys!
Getting desperate, argtard slobs? Here's some “future history”. March 2013. Falklands votes to remain UK BOT. June 2020. Falklands votes to discuss independence with UK. 2030. Falkland Islands and UK agree independence in 2035. UK commits to Falklands Defence Treaty “in perpetuity”. 2036. Argieland stamps its feet, whines and leaves UN. 2037. UN Security Council member UK arranges passage of Security Council resolution denying UN membership to argieland for minimum of 100 years. Resolution also requires all argies to submit to psychoanalysis. And then re-education or euthanasia!
They can try to blame it on fascist elements (peronism = front for victory = hitlerism = fascism) but they're still the ones responsible to furking everyone.
Feb 11th, 2013 - 02:20 pm
“@31, got a link to the original article?”
I've found the original, it is at: www.forbes.com/sites/paulroderickgregory/2013/02/04/no-one-ever-learns-the-argentine-price-freeze/
It looks like the world is finally wising up to the shenanigans of this dictator.
I hope the people at home are too.
Yet again, blowing holes through your bullshit. Heres the verdict of international law, so I wish Unasur should send the Armies to make your lying thieving nation comply with the law.
ICJ judge, Dame Rosalyn Higgins, wrote: “Attractive an aphorism though [self-determination] is, it still has to be said that the territorial issue does come first. Until it is determined where territorial sovereignty lies, it is impossible to see if the inhabitants have a right to self- determination” (Dame Rosalyn Higgins, Problems and Process - International Law and How We Use It, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994)
The British jurist Rosalyn Higgins arrived at a similar conclusion when she pointed out: “No tribunal could tell her [Argentina] that she has to accept British title because she has acquiesced to it But what the protests do not do is to defeat the British title, which was built up in other ways through Argentinas acquiescence.80” There was therefore little doubt that Britain acquired title to the Falklands by extinctive prescription. In other words, it was in this mode that the strength of the British claims resided.
80. Rosalyn Higgins, ”Falklands and the Law,” Observer, 2 May 1982.
The Falkland War : Britain versus the past...Daniel K, Gibran.
It is therefore not surprising that the General Assembly declared
in 1970 that the modem prohibition against the acquisition of territory by conquest should not be construed as affecting titles to territory created 'prior to the Charter regime and valid under international law'
Akehursts Modern Introduction to International Law By Peter Malanczuk
Can anyone remember the commenter on here who pretended to be a professor of international law who couldn't string together an argument if he tried? Well there was a long drawn out thread about the relevance of 'uti possidetis', 'uti possidetis juris', 'status quo ante bellum' and 'extinctive prescription' as relevant legal concepts under which to define the UK's undeniable legal right to the islands. His response was weak to say the least and pretty much stopped commenting after that. It was clear even in the eyes of the law that the UK's claim was stronger than was made out.
I laughed.
@ 45 You certainly made a fantastic first impression
That same “attorney” is also selling obsidian and jade out of suitcase on Florida ave.
“none of the comments found at Merco-British Crap-Press worth to read!”
and you are posting on here because............................?
Only one man's words on the Falklands referendum are relevant - and those are from the Secretary General of the UN Ban Ki-Moon.
When speaking to a reporter from the Argentine newspaper Tiempo Argentino on 12th November 2012 about the Falklands referendum Ban Ki-Moon said, quote: 'The impression is that people who are living under certain conditions should have access to certain level of capacities SO THAT THEY CAN DECIDE ON THEIR OWN FUTURE.'
Ban Ki-Moon also confirmed that Britain is not in breach of any resolutions on the Falklands.
Argentina is running scared!
falklandsnews.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/ban-ki-moon-united-nations.jpg
It's only Sussie Nostrolldamus the xxxxxx
Oh, well done, very well done Tito!! Always first with the wrong answer!
Now, lets have a comment from someone who is not a complete retard.
We still want to include them in talks, even through we don’t exist according to CFK government,
No matter how nasty, we still want to be friends,
mmmmmmmm
Wise of foolish ??
////////
Remember, if the boot was on the other foot,
There would only by ONE country in all this,
Argentina full stop,
Friends, mmm what would we do without them lolol.
And when faced with legal terms that sounded very complicated and a bit scary, the claimant resorted to calling London “gay”. Having carefully weighed up this line of argument the judge found against the claimant.
www.naturalnews.com/039030_Argentina_Cristina_Kirchner_price_freeze.html
I promise everyone here I am not the author! I think he has been following my posts for a long time though...
Kirchner, like many other dictatorial tyrants throughout history, is an egomaniacal murdering criminal who is best dealt with through the use of a short rope and a tall tree. The best message Kirchner could possibly announce to her countrymen at this point would be the message that is broadcast by having a corrupt, criminal regime ex-tyrant swinging in the breeze without a pulse. Only then will the hard-working people of Argentina get what they truly deserve: SOMEONE ELSE other than Kirchner at the helm.
Let it be known that the day the Kirchner regime is removed from power -- and this evil woman is marched through the streets to face the people whose lives she has ruined -- will be a day of great celebration for liberty and justice around the world. To all those in Argentina who are right now fighting against the criminal regime of Kirchner, let it be known that there are many of us here in the USA who are praying and cheering for your victory against tyranny.
May you achieve victory and rid yourself of the putrid parasite known as Kirchner.
Learn more: www.naturalnews.com/039030_Argentina_Cristina_Kirchner_price_freeze.html#ixzz2KcHfa4gX
R U Russian.
why are you here.
No we wont. We will take our teddy bear away and YOU will be sorry. I will then go and tell your Mum, haha
With idiots like that AR has to be fucked for a generation or more.
www.lanacion.com.ar/1553850-alicia-castro-asegura-que-es-impensable-discutir-la-soberania-de-malvinas-con-los-islenos
'MPs criticize suppliers be Uruguayan referendum on Malvinas'
espanol.upi.com/Politica/2013/02/11/Critican-a-parlamentarios-uruguayos-que-ser%C3%A1n-veedores-de-referendo-en-Malvinas/UPI-51971360590850/
'Disseminates UN Latin American position on Falklands'
www.prensa-latina.cu/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&idioma=1&id=1101241&Itemid=1
or get lost or disapear,.
Everybody knows it's a One-sided issue with a tesselation of interested parties surrounding the only player in town.
With no venn-overlaps the bit-players can never come to territorial agreements ... except by the explicit consent of the only player in town.
It's a bugger when the Milky Bar Kid holds the hand with all the Aces ;-)
again and again and again.
shame then you still dont have the british falklands.
still
you cant be right all of the time.lol.
1) Stamp 3 times and if silent move one pace forward ( could be a dud )
2) Stamp three times and if noisy you will more than likely be dead( probably live )
Go ahead Sussie. Declare war and then the gloves are off
But you Sussie will be nice and safe up in Tampa USA plying your profession wont you?
We didn't invite you Darling, hey fellows help me out here, she keeps hitting on me
www.prensa-latina.cu/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&idioma=1&id=1101241&Itemid=1
You've just got to feel sorry for Ban Ki-moon. It must be like banging your head against a brick wall. Everytime they drop something on his desk he must get a sinking feeling in his gut.
I see this link now says Argentina has a 'dossier' where they claim there has now only been 100 years of usurpation. At least it must be quite amusing for Ban Ki-moon that Argentina have still not got their fairy tail straight.
I love when a girl talks dirty
Looks like the “ o ” has been changed to “ 0 ” as in Zero
Thought you had changed sides Ha Ha
Sad very sad
Exactly the same as myself, I married one, lovely girl, had to go to Argentina to find her.
REFERENDUM in 26 DAYS, not long now to the eagerly awaited decision.
Next step take the decision to the UN to seal the deal. Well the BRITISH
We have all noticed that when TTT and Think run out of arguments the number of trolls increase.
We won the argument at last. I suppose if you keep repeating the facts, eventually it will sink in. I suppose that must be an Argie trait as practised by the Argie Goevernment, but they keep lying and lying. The world will know in 26 days what the FALKLANDERS think.
Is Maximo still eating cream buns?
He is to busy playing with his airline
worldairlinenews.com/2012/12/23/aerolineas-argentinas-to-post-its-largest-loss-in-2012/
HEY TROLLS!!
THINK, TTT, DAME DOVER (Think II), DUNG BURGER, and assorted Dopplegangers,
Where is this money going???
All entrusted to Maximo!
Is he giving it to his mom ????
This wouldn't happen in a 'real' Democratic country, with a 'real' Government that serves the people responsibly. Right?
What kind of Government does CFK run??
She can't blame her Ministers, this is her son, pocketing the money!!!
Sleeping during the day.
Will come out at night with the other “creepy-crawleys”!
Either that or they are rehearsing their new scripts that Maximo wrote. I can't believe sussie is back. I thought for sure they off'ed her for being ineffectual.
Can't wait
LOL
Nah mate, I think she just got out of rehab!
When do trolls arrive? I'm bored at the moment
The FALKLANDS will sell them oil, I would suggest Brent Crude + 100% sounds fair to me . They would have to collect.
Oil is dealt on the money markets in U$S, there would have to be some sort of escrow account, wouldn't want them to default, ( they would't do that would they?)
Not known for the Argies to default,at least not this year,yet
AHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH who care about the brits pirates! MALVINAS ARGENTINAS!
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!