Ushuaia feeling the pinch from Chile’s seduction policy to attract cruise vessels
Argentina’s extreme south city and Antarctica cruise hub, Ushuaia is feeling the pinch from the latest Chilean measures to attract more vessels and is requesting a costs adjustment to improve competition conditions.
The Ushuaia Tourism chamber argues that the increase in local port duties and services, plus insufficient infrastructure “will have an impact on the number of cruise vessels calling in the city” which is also known as the gateway for Antarctica cruises.
The Ushuaia tourism chamber, which brings together private operators and agencies, is also concerned with the ‘seduction’ policy implemented by neighbouring Chile which is reducing port and other services duties between 20% and 80% if cruise vessels call on more than one Chilean port.
“We are going to request local authorities to explain why the increase in local port and services fares and if so what improved services will the industry receive”, said Marcelo Lietti, president of the Ushuaia Tourism chamber.
Although this coming Antarctic cruise season is anticipated to be poorer than the previous one and likewise in 2012/2013, “our concerns begin with the announced increase of up to 600% in services costs”, said Lietti.
And this is happening when Chile is implementing seduction policies that include rebates of between 20% and 80% if vessels call in several ports plus the fact they will be allowed to operate their casinos in Chilean waters, added the Argentine entrepreneur.
“We have been informed that several cruise vessels will be calling at Puerto Williams, in Chile, across from Ushuaia because of the lower port and services costs”, added Lietti who also complained about the lack of infrastructure in Ushuaia and the soaring maintenance costs for vessels.
“The ‘Ushuaia’ which is our main Argentine flagged vessel involved in Antarctica cruises opted to have maintenance and repair works in the neighbouring Chilean city of Punta Arenas because of our costs totally out of proportion, it’s shameful for Ushuaia that this should have happened”, underlined Lietti.
Suggested Stories
-
May 21st 2012
Google Earth will tell the world that Patagonia is coming out of the ashes
-
May 25th 2012
Falklands’ expects 20% boost in UK visitors because of the war’s 30th anniversary
-
May 25th 2012
EU files suit against Argentina with WTO, but it’s a long process
-
May 25th 2012
Three former presidents admit Mercosur has failed and has Uruguay ‘trapped’
4 comments Feed
Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.
It´s as result of a new point of view from Chilean central authorities after our local request from long time ago to get lower cost and more atractives to catch more cruise vessels that were lost against Ushuaia because their lower fees.
We are expecting a higher season in cruise's calls, visitors and incomes compared to the last one.
Next time MV Ushuaia has the nerve to go to the Falklands, I respectfully suggest that you ask the RN to send HMS Clyde to harass “Ushuaia”, finger-print its crew, and force them to pay an indemnity for violating Falkland Island waters. It's just a question of elementary reciprocity.
Philippe
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!