By Rebecca Kendall (*) - It has been 30 years since the war over the Falkland/Malvinas Islands ended, but the question of sovereignty in the Islands, located 248 miles off the coast of Argentina, is still very much fresh in the minds of those closest to the issue, including Argentina’s Ambassador to the United States Jorge Argüello.
Ambassador Argüello, along with Argentine consul and deputy consul in Los Angeles, Jorge Lapsenson and Cristina Vallina, visited this week the University of California Los Angeles, as guests of UCLA International Institute, the UCLA Latin American Institute and its Centre for Argentina, Chile and the Southern Cone.
During his talk, Argüello discussed the history of the 179-year-old conflict between Argentina and Britain for control over the Falkland/Malvinas Islands, and his hopes for a peaceful bilateral resolution to the issue.
Then, like now, “the U.K seeks to have a strategic foothold in the South Atlantic,” he said, adding that Argentina “has never ceased to insist upon restitution by the U.K.” after the U.K. took control of the Islands in 1833, ‘expelling the inhabitants’ and denying Argentina of its “sovereign rights” over the Islands. Today, roughly 3.000 people of British decent inhabit the island.
Argüello spoke of the years of cooperation between Britain and Argentina, the steps taken to promote the establishment of social, cultural and economic links between the mainland and the Islands, and the inability of the two nations to come to an agreement regarding which nation had jurisdiction over the territory.
“The only obstacle for a solution is the lack of political will on behalf of the United Kingdom,” he said. “The British presence in the Islands can be explained by the existing balance of power between the UK and Argentina on the one hand, and between the UK and the UN on the other. In both situations, the UK enforces its authority by refusing to fulfil its duty regarding the call of the general assembly of the United Nations. Unfortunately there is no higher authority we can turn to when one of the permanent members of the Security Council refuses to comply with its legal obligations.”
Argentina, he says, is dedicated to peaceful relations and negotiations to regain authority over the Islands, and that the possibility of armed attack initiated by Argentina (as the UK is said to believe possible) is “nonsense.”
Argüello told the audience of more than 40 that Argentina was recently “forced to report the UK to the United Nations Security Council for unnecessarily bringing weapons to the South Atlantic region,” referring to the recent deployment of a nuclear submarine and a state of the art destroyer to the Islands, a surface vessel he says is the same as one recently deployed by the UK to the Persian/Arabian Gulf, which he describes as “an area whose high volatility is not comparable at all to that of the South Atlantic”.
He went on to say that a bilateral agreement (UK/Argentina but leaving out the Islanders) is beneficial and will mark a return to the mutually beneficial relationship once shared between the U.K. and Argentina, one that was highlighted by a longstanding cultural connection strengthened by large British communities settled in Argentina from the 19th century on, as well as strong economic and trade links.
“We do not forget the important role played by Great Britain in the social and economic development in the early years of our nation,” said Argüello, adding that the international community, “which has invaluably supported bilateral conversations throughout the development of the Malvinas question,” will also view this effort as positive.
“We need political will on both sides,” said Argüello. “We need to work side by side to generate political conditions for consensus, and for that we need courage and imagination. It takes two to tango.”
(*) Director of Communications UCLA International Institute
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesArgentina “has never ceased to insist upon restitution by the U.K.” after the U.K. took control of the Islands in 1833, ‘expelling the inhabitants’
Jun 02nd, 2012 - 05:02 am 0Never ceased, that is except for the 90 years between the convention of settlement in 1850 and the resurrection of their illegal claim in 1940 ........ and the inhabitants seem to have refused to be expelled in 1833, as all but 4 of them chose to stay in the islands, and the other 4 chose to leave despite being invited to stay.
The agreement has been reached already, the Falklands are British.
Jun 02nd, 2012 - 05:11 am 0@1 quite right. Argentina miente
Jun 02nd, 2012 - 05:23 am 0Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!