Supreme Tribunal rejects request to include Lula da Silva in the corruption scheme
Brazil Federal Supreme Tribunal denied on Wednesday a request to include former president Lula da Silva in the so-called “trial of the century” involving 38 former ministers and lawmakers accused of an extended bribes scheme.
“The request for the Federal Supreme Tribunal to charge the former president is from a juridical point of view impossible” said magistrate Joaquim Barosa and case rapporteur.
Lula da Silva was accused on Monday by the defence of former lawmaker Roberto Jefferson, one of the 38, and who triggered the scandal back in 2005, of ordering the bribes scheme to have his administration’s legislation approved by Congress. This happened during the former president’s first mandate (2003/07).
“Not only he knew about it” but “he instructed those agreements that this criminal case is discussing”, said defence solicitor Luiz Correa Barbosa. However the magistrates threw out the request to include Lula da Silva recalling that the Prosecution had already analyzed the issue and decided to keep him out of the documents.
“Prosecution is responsible for presenting the charges, so even if we wanted we could not impose on the Attorney General of the Republic the inclusion of someone in the list of defendants”, said Supreme Tribunal magistrate Ricardo Lewandowski.
Lula da Silva is sufficiently intelligent as not to ignore what was going on and the three ministers implicated were but mere auxiliaries in the scheme argued solicitor Correa Barbosa.
“The auxiliaries only followed orders from the boss and left the boss out of the case when it all blew up. They left him out, but not really the lawmakers but the Attorney General of the time …why did he do so? The prosecution will have to give the reasons”, said the defence lawyer.
Jefferson is one of 38 defendants on trial, one of the major corruption scandals in recent Brazilian history and he faces charges of money laundering and active corruption, which the defence has denied before the Federal Supreme Tribunal.
Lula da Silva who kept a clear distance from the trial that involves former leading personalities of his Workers Party in office for almost ten years always denied knowledge of the plan and how the scheme worked. He always stated publicly that he had been betrayed by his advisors and publicly apologized at the time for all that had happened.
Suggested Stories
-
May 24th 2013
Argentina and Brazil jointly developing satellites for South Atlantic research
-
May 24th 2013
Drug trafficker in Rio challenge authorities and the pacifying campaign in favelas
-
May 22nd 2013
Merkel and Brazil’s Rousseff the most powerful women in the world, according to Forbes
-
May 21st 2013
Brazil main opposition party elects a new leader and 2014 presidential hopeful
7 comments Feed
Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.
A seriously great name for someone accused of seriously great corruption.
But the refusal to bring Lula to trial is seriously greater corruption.
And a different American President recognised that The Buck stops at the President's desk.
Except it doesn't if your name is Lula,
he is more akin to the schoolchild who asserts “It wasn't me sir”.
But we ALL know it was.
The refusal to do the right thing shows just how far Brasil has to go before it deserves to take a senior role in world politics.
And who might that be? Mr “I'm not a crook” Nixon? Because if you meant Bush or O'bozo, than you're from another planet.
Ever the ignoramous Fido?
President Truman is recognised as popularising this saying, but heh, I bet you knew that as even you can't be that stupid.
that in Brasil contemporary history is 'history',
whereas in Argentina history is re-invented in every posting.
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!